Representation is power: traditional, hybrid, and digital recruitment results from a non-randomized clinical trial engaging adolescents.

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Taylor B Harrison,Jessica A Sinclair,Lisa J Martin,Kristin Childers-Buschle,Holly Elder,Sunyang Fu,Hongfang Liu,William B Brinkman,Melanie F Myers,Michelle L McGowan
{"title":"Representation is power: traditional, hybrid, and digital recruitment results from a non-randomized clinical trial engaging adolescents.","authors":"Taylor B Harrison,Jessica A Sinclair,Lisa J Martin,Kristin Childers-Buschle,Holly Elder,Sunyang Fu,Hongfang Liu,William B Brinkman,Melanie F Myers,Michelle L McGowan","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01947-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical trials support the iterative advancement of modern medicine. However, challenges in achieving population-representativeness or participant sampling commensurate with the burden of disease can limit the generalizability and reproducibility of trial results. Here, we present the recruitment strategies and cohort profile of the Engaging Adolescents in Decisions about Return of Genomic Research Results non-randomized clinical trial (NCT0448106), where traditional, targeted hybrid, and digital recruitment methods were implemented with quota sampling to enroll diverse adolescents (ages 13-17) and young adults (ages 18-21). The largest proportion of participants enrolled through digital strategies (39.1%), followed by traditional (34.2%), and targeted hybrid strategies (23.2%). Despite lower enrollment, targeted hybrid recruitment, involving letters and text messages, had the largest proportion of participants from groups historically underrepresented in research (87.5%), compared to traditional (48.5%) and digital (32.3%) methods (p < 0.001). Our findings demonstrate a model for achieving both recruitment targets and inclusive trial participation to counteract overrepresentation of participants of European descent in clinical research.","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"601"},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01947-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical trials support the iterative advancement of modern medicine. However, challenges in achieving population-representativeness or participant sampling commensurate with the burden of disease can limit the generalizability and reproducibility of trial results. Here, we present the recruitment strategies and cohort profile of the Engaging Adolescents in Decisions about Return of Genomic Research Results non-randomized clinical trial (NCT0448106), where traditional, targeted hybrid, and digital recruitment methods were implemented with quota sampling to enroll diverse adolescents (ages 13-17) and young adults (ages 18-21). The largest proportion of participants enrolled through digital strategies (39.1%), followed by traditional (34.2%), and targeted hybrid strategies (23.2%). Despite lower enrollment, targeted hybrid recruitment, involving letters and text messages, had the largest proportion of participants from groups historically underrepresented in research (87.5%), compared to traditional (48.5%) and digital (32.3%) methods (p < 0.001). Our findings demonstrate a model for achieving both recruitment targets and inclusive trial participation to counteract overrepresentation of participants of European descent in clinical research.
代表性就是力量:一项涉及青少年的非随机临床试验的传统、混合和数字招募结果。
临床试验支持现代医学的迭代进步。然而,在实现人口代表性或与疾病负担相称的参与者抽样方面的挑战可能限制试验结果的普遍性和可重复性。在此,我们介绍了参与基因组研究结果返回决策的青少年参与非随机临床试验(NCT0448106)的招募策略和队列资料,该试验采用传统、靶向混合和数字招募方法,采用配额抽样方法招募不同的青少年(13-17岁)和年轻人(18-21岁)。通过数字策略注册的参与者比例最大(39.1%),其次是传统策略(34.2%)和有针对性的混合策略(23.2%)。尽管入学率较低,但与传统方法(48.5%)和数字方法(32.3%)相比,包括信件和短信在内的有针对性的混合招募中,来自历史上未被充分代表的群体的参与者比例最大(87.5%)(p < 0.001)。我们的研究结果展示了一个既能实现招募目标又能实现包容性试验参与的模型,以抵消临床研究中欧洲血统参与者的过度代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信