Innovative radiation protection system enables reduction in the weight of lead aprons during electrophysiological procedures.

IF 2.6
Avishag Laish-Farkash, Michael Rahkovich, Yonatan Kogan, Gergana Marincheva, Eyal Ben-Assa, Ariel Roguin, Eli I Lev
{"title":"Innovative radiation protection system enables reduction in the weight of lead aprons during electrophysiological procedures.","authors":"Avishag Laish-Farkash, Michael Rahkovich, Yonatan Kogan, Gergana Marincheva, Eyal Ben-Assa, Ariel Roguin, Eli I Lev","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02123-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluoroscopy-guided medical procedures require medical personnel to wear lead aprons (typically 0.5-mm Pb), which weigh up to 7 kg and can cause significant occupational injuries. A novel robotic radiation-blocking system, Radiaction, reduces full-body scattered radiation by 92% for all Cath-lab staff.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine if lighter lead aprons, when combined with Radiaction, can provide protection comparable to the standard 0.5-mm Pb aprons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three setups were tested: (1) 0.5-mm Pb apron without Radiaction (control), (2) 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction, and (3) 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction. Radiation attenuation was measured through analytic calculations, bench tests, and clinical prospective controlled evaluations in an electrophysiology laboratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to analytical calculations, radiation reduction was 98% for 0.5-mm Pb aprons, 98.5% for 0.25-mm Pb with Radiaction, and 97% for 0.125-mm Pb with Radiaction. Bench tests showed reductions of 97%, 98.9%, and 98%, respectively. Clinical evaluations showed reductions of 99.2% for ablation procedures (98.8% upper- and 99.6% lower body) and 97.1% reductions for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) procedures (94.4% upper- and 99.7% lower body) with the 0.25-mm Pb apron and Radiaction. With the 0.125-mm Pb apron and Radiaction, reductions were 97.9% for ablations (97.4% upper- and 98.4% lower body) and 81.7% for CIED procedures (65% upper- and 98.5% lower body).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction appears to surpass the standard 0.5-mm Pb apron in radiation protection, while the 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction offers comparable protection. This suggests that Radiaction enables significant apron weight reduction during electrophysiologic procedures without compromising safety and potentially reducing orthopedic injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":520675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02123-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fluoroscopy-guided medical procedures require medical personnel to wear lead aprons (typically 0.5-mm Pb), which weigh up to 7 kg and can cause significant occupational injuries. A novel robotic radiation-blocking system, Radiaction, reduces full-body scattered radiation by 92% for all Cath-lab staff.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine if lighter lead aprons, when combined with Radiaction, can provide protection comparable to the standard 0.5-mm Pb aprons.

Methods: Three setups were tested: (1) 0.5-mm Pb apron without Radiaction (control), (2) 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction, and (3) 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction. Radiation attenuation was measured through analytic calculations, bench tests, and clinical prospective controlled evaluations in an electrophysiology laboratory.

Results: According to analytical calculations, radiation reduction was 98% for 0.5-mm Pb aprons, 98.5% for 0.25-mm Pb with Radiaction, and 97% for 0.125-mm Pb with Radiaction. Bench tests showed reductions of 97%, 98.9%, and 98%, respectively. Clinical evaluations showed reductions of 99.2% for ablation procedures (98.8% upper- and 99.6% lower body) and 97.1% reductions for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) procedures (94.4% upper- and 99.7% lower body) with the 0.25-mm Pb apron and Radiaction. With the 0.125-mm Pb apron and Radiaction, reductions were 97.9% for ablations (97.4% upper- and 98.4% lower body) and 81.7% for CIED procedures (65% upper- and 98.5% lower body).

Conclusions: The 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction appears to surpass the standard 0.5-mm Pb apron in radiation protection, while the 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction offers comparable protection. This suggests that Radiaction enables significant apron weight reduction during electrophysiologic procedures without compromising safety and potentially reducing orthopedic injuries.

创新的辐射防护系统可以减少电生理过程中铅围裙的重量。
背景:透视引导下的医疗程序要求医务人员佩戴铅围裙(通常为0.5 mm铅),其重量可达7公斤,可造成严重的职业伤害。一种新型的机器人辐射阻断系统,Radiaction,为所有化验室工作人员减少了92%的全身散射辐射。目的:本研究旨在确定较轻的铅围裙,当与辐射结合时,是否可以提供与标准0.5 mm铅围裙相当的保护。方法:采用3种设置:(1)0.5 mm无辐射铅围裙(对照),(2)0.25 mm有辐射铅围裙(对照),(3)0.125 mm有辐射铅围裙(对照)。通过分析计算、台架试验和电生理实验室的临床前瞻性对照评估来测量辐射衰减。结果:经分析计算,0.5 mm铅围裙的减辐射率为98%,0.25 mm铅围裙的减辐射率为98.5%,0.125 mm铅围裙的减辐射率为97%。台架试验分别显示减少了97%、98.9%和98%。临床评估显示,使用0.25 mm铅围裙和Radiaction的消融术减少99.2%(上半身98.8%,下半身99.6%),心血管植入式电子装置(CIED)手术减少97.1%(上半身94.4%,下半身99.7%)。使用0.125 mm的铅围裙和辐射,消融手术的减少率为97.9%(上半身97.4%,下半身98.4%),CIED手术的减少率为81.7%(上半身65%,下半身98.5%)。结论:带Radiaction的0.25 mm铅围裙的防护效果优于标准的0.5 mm铅围裙,而带Radiaction的0.125 mm铅围裙的防护效果与标准的0.5 mm铅围裙相当。这表明,在电生理手术过程中,放射治疗可以显著减轻围板重量,而不会影响安全性,并可能减少骨科损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信