In my time: A qualitative exploration of the junior doctor experience in Singapore over the years.

IF 2 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Caitlin Alsandria O'Hara, Nur Haidah Ahmad Kamal, En Ci Isaac Ong, De Wei Isaac Chung, Siew Ngan Faith Lim, Malcolm Ravindran Mahadevan
{"title":"In my time: A qualitative exploration of the junior doctor experience in Singapore over the years.","authors":"Caitlin Alsandria O'Hara, Nur Haidah Ahmad Kamal, En Ci Isaac Ong, De Wei Isaac Chung, Siew Ngan Faith Lim, Malcolm Ravindran Mahadevan","doi":"10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite efforts to improve junior doctors' working conditions, burnout, distress and disillusionment persist, with implications for patient outcomes. This qualitative study analysed factors shaping the lived experiences of junior doctors in Singapore and their changes over time, thereby seeking to inform improvements to working conditions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirty purposively sampled respondents who were junior doctors in Singapore between 1975 and 2022 were interviewed. Respondents were grouped into 3 cohorts: (1) junior, (2) middle and (3) senior. Employing the framework method of qualitative analysis, open coding was performed with reference to the individual, interpersonal, institutional, community and policy levels of the socioecological model (SEM). Four themes emerged: (1) inherent challenges of junior doctorship, (2) exacerbating factors, (3) alleviating factors and (4) responses of junior doctors to their experiences. Codes were reconstructed into a modified SEM, demonstrating trickle-down effects of interpersonal or structural forces on the individual doctor and pertinent factors evolving with time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across cohorts, respondents echoed mental and physical challenges. While senior cohort doctors recounted higher patient-to-doctor ratios and longer working hours, junior cohort doctors cited new difficulties. These include a hostile medicolegal landscape, patients' increasingly complex needs and expectations, and higher administrative loads. Amid these difficulties, alleviating factors included good workplace relationships alongside institutional interventions. Doctors responded differently to their challenges. Some externalised difficulties through expression and advocacy; others internalised them, whether into fulfilment or distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While some facets of junior doctorship have improved with time, new challenges that warrant consideration are emerging. Junior doctors should be centred, listened to and empowered in shaping improvements to working conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":502093,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore","volume":"54 9","pages":"542-560"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite efforts to improve junior doctors' working conditions, burnout, distress and disillusionment persist, with implications for patient outcomes. This qualitative study analysed factors shaping the lived experiences of junior doctors in Singapore and their changes over time, thereby seeking to inform improvements to working conditions.

Method: Thirty purposively sampled respondents who were junior doctors in Singapore between 1975 and 2022 were interviewed. Respondents were grouped into 3 cohorts: (1) junior, (2) middle and (3) senior. Employing the framework method of qualitative analysis, open coding was performed with reference to the individual, interpersonal, institutional, community and policy levels of the socioecological model (SEM). Four themes emerged: (1) inherent challenges of junior doctorship, (2) exacerbating factors, (3) alleviating factors and (4) responses of junior doctors to their experiences. Codes were reconstructed into a modified SEM, demonstrating trickle-down effects of interpersonal or structural forces on the individual doctor and pertinent factors evolving with time.

Results: Across cohorts, respondents echoed mental and physical challenges. While senior cohort doctors recounted higher patient-to-doctor ratios and longer working hours, junior cohort doctors cited new difficulties. These include a hostile medicolegal landscape, patients' increasingly complex needs and expectations, and higher administrative loads. Amid these difficulties, alleviating factors included good workplace relationships alongside institutional interventions. Doctors responded differently to their challenges. Some externalised difficulties through expression and advocacy; others internalised them, whether into fulfilment or distress.

Conclusion: While some facets of junior doctorship have improved with time, new challenges that warrant consideration are emerging. Junior doctors should be centred, listened to and empowered in shaping improvements to working conditions.

在我的时代:对新加坡多年来初级医生经历的定性探索。
导言:尽管努力改善初级医生的工作条件,倦怠,痛苦和幻灭持续存在,对患者的结果的影响。这项定性研究分析了影响新加坡初级医生生活经历的因素及其随时间的变化,从而寻求改善工作条件的信息。方法:对1975年至2022年间在新加坡从事初级医生工作的30名有目的的受访者进行访谈。受访者被分为三组:(1)初级,(2)中级和(3)高级。采用定性分析的框架方法,参照社会生态模型(SEM)的个体、人际、制度、社区和政策层面进行开放编码。主要有四个主题:(1)初级医生的内在挑战;(2)加重因素;(3)缓解因素;(4)初级医生对其经历的反应。代码被重构成一个改进的扫描电镜,展示了人际或结构力量对个体医生的涓滴效应和相关因素随着时间的推移而变化。结果:在整个队列中,受访者反映了心理和身体上的挑战。虽然资深队列医生讲述了更高的医患比例和更长的工作时间,但初级队列医生提到了新的困难。这些挑战包括恶劣的医学法律环境、患者日益复杂的需求和期望以及更高的行政负担。在这些困难中,缓解因素包括良好的工作场所关系和制度干预。医生们对挑战的反应各不相同。通过表达和倡导将困难外部化;另一些人则把它们内化,要么变成满足,要么变成痛苦。结论:虽然随着时间的推移,初级博士学位的某些方面有所改善,但值得考虑的新挑战正在出现。在改善工作条件方面,初级医生应该被集中起来,听取他们的意见,并获得权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信