Diana E Carver, Sumit Pruthi, Olesya Struk, Marta Vigil-Garcia, Cecilia Meijer, Josephine Gehrels, Reed A Omary, John R Scheel, Cassandra L Thiel
{"title":"Measuring the Environmental Impact of MRI and CT: A Life Cycle Assessment.","authors":"Diana E Carver, Sumit Pruthi, Olesya Struk, Marta Vigil-Garcia, Cecilia Meijer, Josephine Gehrels, Reed A Omary, John R Scheel, Cassandra L Thiel","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.09.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the environmental impact of magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) imaging using life cycle assessment (LCA), focusing on energy use, resource consumption, and emissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This ISO 14040-guided LCA-based study focused on MRI and CT services, including the production and use of three MRI and four CT scanners, at a quaternary care 800-bed academic medical center in the Southeastern USA over a one-year period. Data were collected through direct observation, record review, staff interviews, and energy metering. Environmental impacts were assessed using SimaPro 9.3.0.2 and the Ecoinvent v3.8 database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRI and CT services at this site generate an estimated 221 and 108 tons of CO2e per year, respectively. This is equivalent to the emissions of 52 (MRI) and 25 (CT) cars driven annually. Energy consumption accounted for the largest portion of emissions (58% for MRI, 33% for CT), followed by disposable supplies (26% for MRI, 16% for CT), capital equipment production (7% for MRI, 13% for CT), and linens (4% for MRI, 11% for CT). Switching to solar photovoltaic electricity could reduce total MRI emissions by 70% and CT emissions by 40%, increasing the relative impacts of scanner production, disposable supplies, and linens.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study highlights the significant environmental impact of MRI and CT services, particularly energy consumption. Renewable energy sources, such as solar photovoltaics, offer the greatest potential for mitigating the environmental footprint. Additional strategies include optimizing scanner utilization, adopting reusable or reprocessable supplies, and embracing circular business practices such as circular manufacturing and extending the lifespan of capital equipment.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2025.09.030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the environmental impact of magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) imaging using life cycle assessment (LCA), focusing on energy use, resource consumption, and emissions.
Methods: This ISO 14040-guided LCA-based study focused on MRI and CT services, including the production and use of three MRI and four CT scanners, at a quaternary care 800-bed academic medical center in the Southeastern USA over a one-year period. Data were collected through direct observation, record review, staff interviews, and energy metering. Environmental impacts were assessed using SimaPro 9.3.0.2 and the Ecoinvent v3.8 database.
Results: MRI and CT services at this site generate an estimated 221 and 108 tons of CO2e per year, respectively. This is equivalent to the emissions of 52 (MRI) and 25 (CT) cars driven annually. Energy consumption accounted for the largest portion of emissions (58% for MRI, 33% for CT), followed by disposable supplies (26% for MRI, 16% for CT), capital equipment production (7% for MRI, 13% for CT), and linens (4% for MRI, 11% for CT). Switching to solar photovoltaic electricity could reduce total MRI emissions by 70% and CT emissions by 40%, increasing the relative impacts of scanner production, disposable supplies, and linens.
Discussion: This study highlights the significant environmental impact of MRI and CT services, particularly energy consumption. Renewable energy sources, such as solar photovoltaics, offer the greatest potential for mitigating the environmental footprint. Additional strategies include optimizing scanner utilization, adopting reusable or reprocessable supplies, and embracing circular business practices such as circular manufacturing and extending the lifespan of capital equipment.