{"title":"Factors associated with non-use of an early prenatal interview, data from 2021 National Perinatal Survey","authors":"Marie Viaud, Nathalie Lelong, Camille Le Ray","doi":"10.3917/spub.255.0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pregnancy monitoring in France includes an early prenatal interview (EPP), to assess with the pregnant woman any needs she may have for support during her pregnancy. The aim was to study the factors associated with the absence of an EPP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population corresponded to women with a live birth in metropolitan France who answered the question about the EPP in the ENP 2021 (n=10,925). Individual factors and health offer were analysed using Chi-square tests and multivariate mixed logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 60% of women reported not having had an EPP or that they didn’t know. Women under 25 years of age (adjusted OR= 1.30, 95%IC[1.10-1.55]), or not French nationality (ORa=2.10 [1.61-2.73] if North African nationality), or with a level of education lower than high school (ORa=2.17 [1.86-2.54]), had a higher probability of declaring that they had not had an EPP. Compared with women attended by a private midwife, women attended by a private or public obstetrician-gynaecologist (ORa=1.81 [1.62-2.03] ; ORa=1.66 [1.42-1.95]), a general practitioner (ORa=1.62 [1.29-2.04]) or a midwife in a maternity (ORa=1.19 [1.03-1.37]) more often reported not having had an EPP, as well as women living in a department with a low density of private midwives (ORa=1.51 [1.11-2.05]).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Raising awareness and training healthcare professionals in EPP are key to its deployment, as there are social inequalities in the way it is currently practised. Particular attention needs to be paid to the most vulnerable socio-economic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":"37 3","pages":"49-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.255.0049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Pregnancy monitoring in France includes an early prenatal interview (EPP), to assess with the pregnant woman any needs she may have for support during her pregnancy. The aim was to study the factors associated with the absence of an EPP.
Methods: The study population corresponded to women with a live birth in metropolitan France who answered the question about the EPP in the ENP 2021 (n=10,925). Individual factors and health offer were analysed using Chi-square tests and multivariate mixed logistic regression.
Results: Over 60% of women reported not having had an EPP or that they didn’t know. Women under 25 years of age (adjusted OR= 1.30, 95%IC[1.10-1.55]), or not French nationality (ORa=2.10 [1.61-2.73] if North African nationality), or with a level of education lower than high school (ORa=2.17 [1.86-2.54]), had a higher probability of declaring that they had not had an EPP. Compared with women attended by a private midwife, women attended by a private or public obstetrician-gynaecologist (ORa=1.81 [1.62-2.03] ; ORa=1.66 [1.42-1.95]), a general practitioner (ORa=1.62 [1.29-2.04]) or a midwife in a maternity (ORa=1.19 [1.03-1.37]) more often reported not having had an EPP, as well as women living in a department with a low density of private midwives (ORa=1.51 [1.11-2.05]).
Discussion: Raising awareness and training healthcare professionals in EPP are key to its deployment, as there are social inequalities in the way it is currently practised. Particular attention needs to be paid to the most vulnerable socio-economic groups.
期刊介绍：
La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs,
professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie
des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions
de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de
soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale.
Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur
l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants
et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé,
organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques
de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation
et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille
sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents
secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique
d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources,
politiques de régulation et de financement, etc
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
