Who determines the outcome? A three-level meta-analysis on systemic therapy in children and adolescents.

IF 3 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Niels Braus, Christoph Flückiger, Johanna Wichmann, Christian Frankman, Robin Gräfenkämper, Martina Zemp, Christina Hunger-Schoppe
{"title":"Who determines the outcome? A three-level meta-analysis on systemic therapy in children and adolescents.","authors":"Niels Braus, Christoph Flückiger, Johanna Wichmann, Christian Frankman, Robin Gräfenkämper, Martina Zemp, Christina Hunger-Schoppe","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2565236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Systemic therapy (ST) is a well-established treatment approach to reduce symptoms, yet its effects across outcome domains, informants, and assessment methods remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature review in multiple databases (PsycINFO, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL), including RCT-studies comparing ST with a psychosocial control treatment for diagnosed children or adolescents. We conducted a three-level meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using an adaptation for psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, we included 44 studies, 370 effect sizes, and 4617 families. The overall effect size was small but significant (<i>g</i> = .16, <i>CI</i> [.09, .23], <i>p</i> < .0001). Contrary to expectations, informants and assessment methods were no significant moderators. Effects were comparable across outcome domains including family functioning (<i>g</i> = .12), caregivers' psychopathology (<i>g</i> = .12) and patient symptoms (<i>g</i> = .19). Outcomes were mostly based on self-report symptom questionnaires, limiting interpretability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings support that ST improves family functioning and caregivers' psychopathology, underscoring the need for more diverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2565236","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Systemic therapy (ST) is a well-established treatment approach to reduce symptoms, yet its effects across outcome domains, informants, and assessment methods remain underexplored.

Method: We conducted a systematic literature review in multiple databases (PsycINFO, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL), including RCT-studies comparing ST with a psychosocial control treatment for diagnosed children or adolescents. We conducted a three-level meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using an adaptation for psychotherapy.

Results: Overall, we included 44 studies, 370 effect sizes, and 4617 families. The overall effect size was small but significant (g = .16, CI [.09, .23], p < .0001). Contrary to expectations, informants and assessment methods were no significant moderators. Effects were comparable across outcome domains including family functioning (g = .12), caregivers' psychopathology (g = .12) and patient symptoms (g = .19). Outcomes were mostly based on self-report symptom questionnaires, limiting interpretability.

Conclusion: Findings support that ST improves family functioning and caregivers' psychopathology, underscoring the need for more diverse outcomes.

谁决定结果?儿童和青少年全身治疗的三水平荟萃分析。
目的:全身治疗(ST)是一种公认的减轻症状的治疗方法,但其在结果域、信息提供者和评估方法上的效果仍未得到充分探讨。方法:我们在多个数据库(PsycINFO, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL)中进行了系统的文献综述,包括比较ST与诊断儿童或青少年心理社会控制治疗的随机对照研究。我们进行了一个三层次的荟萃分析。使用心理治疗适应症评估偏倚风险。结果:总的来说,我们纳入了44项研究,370个效应量,4617个家庭。总体效应值虽小但显著(g =。[qh]09年。[23], p =。12)、照顾者精神病理(g = .12)和患者症状(g = .19)。结果大多基于自我报告症状问卷,限制了可解释性。结论:研究结果支持ST改善家庭功能和照顾者的精神病理,强调需要更多样化的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信