Disparities in Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality in Incarcerated vs. Non-Incarcerated Patients in Michigan: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Adam Mssika, Benjamin Robinson, Shane Tinsley, Alessandro Bertini, Alex Stephens, Alessio Finocchiaro, Silvia Vigano, Antonio Perri, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicolò Buffi, Gabriele Sorce, Vincenzo Ficarra, Andrea Salonia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Akshay Sood, Craig Rogers, Firas Abdollah
{"title":"Disparities in Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality in Incarcerated vs. Non-Incarcerated Patients in Michigan: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Adam Mssika, Benjamin Robinson, Shane Tinsley, Alessandro Bertini, Alex Stephens, Alessio Finocchiaro, Silvia Vigano, Antonio Perri, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicolò Buffi, Gabriele Sorce, Vincenzo Ficarra, Andrea Salonia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Akshay Sood, Craig Rogers, Firas Abdollah","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With rising incarceration and cancer diagnosis rates in the US, understanding the relationship between incarceration status and cancer outcomes is critical. Our study examined prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM) disparities in incarcerated patients (IP) vs. non-incarcerated patients (NP) in Michigan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Michigan Department of Health & Human Services Database (MDHHS) was screened for prostate cancer (PCa)(Histology=8140) diagnosed patients between 2004-2015. IP and NP were cross-analyzed with demographic and clinical covariates. The cumulative incidence function (CIF) and competing risks multivariable regression were used to examine incarceration impact on PCSM after accounting for all covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our cohort of 76,045 patients, 152 were IP. Compared to NP, IP were more likely to be younger (median 58.0 years vs. 67.0 years) and non-hispanic black (NHB)(65.8% vs. 16.0%), both p<0.0001. IP had higher probability to be diagnosed with ≤cT2 PCa (95.3% vs. 88.5%;p<0.0001), cN0 PCa (94.1% vs. 86.8%;p<0.01), and undergo surgery as first course treatment (31.6% vs. 24.4%;p=0.02). Compared to NP, no difference was found in gleason grade ≥8 (52.6% vs. 51.4%;p=0.9) and PSA (median 7.5 vs. 5.9;p=0.6). At 10 years, PCSM was 14.7% (95% CI:7.0%-25.0%) in IP vs. 11.4% (95% CI:11.1%-11.7%) in NP (p=0.2). At the multivariable analysis, IP had a 2.44 fold (95% CI:1.53-3.88;p<0.001) higher PCSM risk than NP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite being diagnosed with PCa at a younger age and an earlier stage, IP showed a higher PCSM risk than NP. Further research is warranted to examine this difference.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"101097UPJ0000000000000900"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: With rising incarceration and cancer diagnosis rates in the US, understanding the relationship between incarceration status and cancer outcomes is critical. Our study examined prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM) disparities in incarcerated patients (IP) vs. non-incarcerated patients (NP) in Michigan.

Methods: The Michigan Department of Health & Human Services Database (MDHHS) was screened for prostate cancer (PCa)(Histology=8140) diagnosed patients between 2004-2015. IP and NP were cross-analyzed with demographic and clinical covariates. The cumulative incidence function (CIF) and competing risks multivariable regression were used to examine incarceration impact on PCSM after accounting for all covariates.

Results: In our cohort of 76,045 patients, 152 were IP. Compared to NP, IP were more likely to be younger (median 58.0 years vs. 67.0 years) and non-hispanic black (NHB)(65.8% vs. 16.0%), both p<0.0001. IP had higher probability to be diagnosed with ≤cT2 PCa (95.3% vs. 88.5%;p<0.0001), cN0 PCa (94.1% vs. 86.8%;p<0.01), and undergo surgery as first course treatment (31.6% vs. 24.4%;p=0.02). Compared to NP, no difference was found in gleason grade ≥8 (52.6% vs. 51.4%;p=0.9) and PSA (median 7.5 vs. 5.9;p=0.6). At 10 years, PCSM was 14.7% (95% CI:7.0%-25.0%) in IP vs. 11.4% (95% CI:11.1%-11.7%) in NP (p=0.2). At the multivariable analysis, IP had a 2.44 fold (95% CI:1.53-3.88;p<0.001) higher PCSM risk than NP.

Conclusion: Despite being diagnosed with PCa at a younger age and an earlier stage, IP showed a higher PCSM risk than NP. Further research is warranted to examine this difference.

密歇根州监禁与非监禁患者前列腺癌特异性死亡率的差异:一项全州回顾性队列研究。
随着美国监禁和癌症诊断率的上升,了解监禁状况和癌症结局之间的关系至关重要。我们的研究检查了密歇根州监禁患者(IP)与非监禁患者(NP)的前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)差异。方法:对2004-2015年密歇根州卫生与公众服务部数据库(MDHHS)中诊断为前列腺癌(PCa)(组织学=8140)的患者进行筛查。IP和NP与人口统计学和临床协变量进行交叉分析。在考虑所有协变量后,使用累积关联函数(CIF)和竞争风险多变量回归来检验监禁对PCSM的影响。结果:在我们的76045例患者队列中,152例为IP。与NP相比,IP更可能是年轻人(中位年龄58.0岁vs. 67.0岁)和非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)(65.8% vs. 16.0%)。结论:尽管被诊断为PCa的年龄更小,早期阶段,IP比NP显示出更高的PCSM风险。需要进一步的研究来检验这种差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Practice
Urology Practice UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
163
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信