Psychometric Properties of the Belief in Divine Retribution Scale: Turkish Version, Validity, and Reliability Study in Turkey.

IF 2 1区 哲学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ece Alagöz, Merve Bat Tonkuş
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Belief in Divine Retribution Scale: Turkish Version, Validity, and Reliability Study in Turkey.","authors":"Ece Alagöz, Merve Bat Tonkuş","doi":"10.1007/s10943-025-02471-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Belief systems significantly influence individuals' cognitive and emotional processes. Among these, belief in divine retribution notably affects moral behavior and provides a framework for interpreting life's challenges. This study aimed to adapt the Belief in Divine Retribution Scale (BDRS) into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties in a Turkish sample. Convergent validity was further evaluated by investigating the relationship between the BDRS and religious obsessions. This methodological study included 425 participants aged 18 years and older residing in Turkey. The adaptation process involved translation, back-translation, expert review, and pilot testing. The adaptation process followed established guidelines for cross-cultural validation of religious and spiritual measures. Data were collected using the Belief in Divine Retribution Scale, the Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity (PIOS), and a demographic questionnaire. Construct validity was assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and reliability was measured using Cronbach's alpha (α). Convergent validity was analyzed with Pearson's correlation coefficients. The Turkish version maintained the original scale structure and identified a two-factor model: belief in divine reward (seven items) and belief in divine punishment (three items). The scale explained 64.9% of the total variance (KMO = 0.916; Bartlett's test, p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable model fit (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 2.370; CFI = 0.960; RMSEA = 0.078). The overall scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.911). The subscales' Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.889 for Reward Belief and 0.799 for Punishment Belief. A significant positive correlation was found between belief in divine retribution and religious obsessions (r = 0.426, p < 0.001). These results support the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Belief in Divine Retribution Scale. It can be used to assess individuals' religious belief structures and their tendencies toward religious obsessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48054,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-025-02471-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Belief systems significantly influence individuals' cognitive and emotional processes. Among these, belief in divine retribution notably affects moral behavior and provides a framework for interpreting life's challenges. This study aimed to adapt the Belief in Divine Retribution Scale (BDRS) into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties in a Turkish sample. Convergent validity was further evaluated by investigating the relationship between the BDRS and religious obsessions. This methodological study included 425 participants aged 18 years and older residing in Turkey. The adaptation process involved translation, back-translation, expert review, and pilot testing. The adaptation process followed established guidelines for cross-cultural validation of religious and spiritual measures. Data were collected using the Belief in Divine Retribution Scale, the Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity (PIOS), and a demographic questionnaire. Construct validity was assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and reliability was measured using Cronbach's alpha (α). Convergent validity was analyzed with Pearson's correlation coefficients. The Turkish version maintained the original scale structure and identified a two-factor model: belief in divine reward (seven items) and belief in divine punishment (three items). The scale explained 64.9% of the total variance (KMO = 0.916; Bartlett's test, p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable model fit (χ2/df = 2.370; CFI = 0.960; RMSEA = 0.078). The overall scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.911). The subscales' Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.889 for Reward Belief and 0.799 for Punishment Belief. A significant positive correlation was found between belief in divine retribution and religious obsessions (r = 0.426, p < 0.001). These results support the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Belief in Divine Retribution Scale. It can be used to assess individuals' religious belief structures and their tendencies toward religious obsessions.

神罚信仰量表的心理测量特征:土耳其语版本、效度及信度研究。
信念系统显著影响个体的认知和情绪过程。其中,对神的报应的信仰显著影响道德行为,并为解释生活中的挑战提供了一个框架。本研究旨在将信仰神罚量表(BDRS)改编为土耳其语,并在土耳其样本中检验其心理测量特性。通过调查BDRS与宗教执著的关系,进一步评估收敛效度。这项方法学研究包括425名18岁及以上居住在土耳其的参与者。适应过程包括翻译、反翻译、专家评审和试点测试。适应过程遵循宗教和精神措施跨文化验证的既定指导方针。数据收集使用信仰神的报应量表,宾夕法尼亚审慎量表(PIOS)和人口调查问卷。通过探索性和验证性因子分析评估结构效度,采用Cronbach’s alpha (α)测量信度。采用Pearson相关系数分析收敛效度。土耳其版本保持了原来的量表结构,并确定了一个双因素模型:信仰神的奖励(七个项目)和信仰神的惩罚(三个项目)。该量表解释了总方差的64.9% (KMO = 0.916; Bartlett检验,p 2/df = 2.370; CFI = 0.960; RMSEA = 0.078)。整体量表具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α = 0.911)。奖励信念子量表的Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.889,惩罚信念子量表的Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.799。相信神的报应与宗教信仰之间存在显著的正相关(r = 0.426, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: Journal of Religion and Health is an international publication concerned with the creative partnership of psychology and religion/sprituality and the relationship between religion/spirituality and both mental and physical health. This multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary journal publishes peer-reviewed original contributions from scholars and professionals of all religious faiths. Articles may be clinical, statistical, theoretical, impressionistic, or anecdotal. Founded in 1961 by the Blanton-Peale Institute, which joins the perspectives of psychology and religion, Journal of Religion and Health explores the most contemporary modes of religious thought with particular emphasis on their relevance to current medical and psychological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信