{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Belief in Divine Retribution Scale: Turkish Version, Validity, and Reliability Study in Turkey.","authors":"Ece Alagöz, Merve Bat Tonkuş","doi":"10.1007/s10943-025-02471-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Belief systems significantly influence individuals' cognitive and emotional processes. Among these, belief in divine retribution notably affects moral behavior and provides a framework for interpreting life's challenges. This study aimed to adapt the Belief in Divine Retribution Scale (BDRS) into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties in a Turkish sample. Convergent validity was further evaluated by investigating the relationship between the BDRS and religious obsessions. This methodological study included 425 participants aged 18 years and older residing in Turkey. The adaptation process involved translation, back-translation, expert review, and pilot testing. The adaptation process followed established guidelines for cross-cultural validation of religious and spiritual measures. Data were collected using the Belief in Divine Retribution Scale, the Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity (PIOS), and a demographic questionnaire. Construct validity was assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and reliability was measured using Cronbach's alpha (α). Convergent validity was analyzed with Pearson's correlation coefficients. The Turkish version maintained the original scale structure and identified a two-factor model: belief in divine reward (seven items) and belief in divine punishment (three items). The scale explained 64.9% of the total variance (KMO = 0.916; Bartlett's test, p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable model fit (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 2.370; CFI = 0.960; RMSEA = 0.078). The overall scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.911). The subscales' Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.889 for Reward Belief and 0.799 for Punishment Belief. A significant positive correlation was found between belief in divine retribution and religious obsessions (r = 0.426, p < 0.001). These results support the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Belief in Divine Retribution Scale. It can be used to assess individuals' religious belief structures and their tendencies toward religious obsessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48054,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-025-02471-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Belief systems significantly influence individuals' cognitive and emotional processes. Among these, belief in divine retribution notably affects moral behavior and provides a framework for interpreting life's challenges. This study aimed to adapt the Belief in Divine Retribution Scale (BDRS) into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties in a Turkish sample. Convergent validity was further evaluated by investigating the relationship between the BDRS and religious obsessions. This methodological study included 425 participants aged 18 years and older residing in Turkey. The adaptation process involved translation, back-translation, expert review, and pilot testing. The adaptation process followed established guidelines for cross-cultural validation of religious and spiritual measures. Data were collected using the Belief in Divine Retribution Scale, the Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity (PIOS), and a demographic questionnaire. Construct validity was assessed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and reliability was measured using Cronbach's alpha (α). Convergent validity was analyzed with Pearson's correlation coefficients. The Turkish version maintained the original scale structure and identified a two-factor model: belief in divine reward (seven items) and belief in divine punishment (three items). The scale explained 64.9% of the total variance (KMO = 0.916; Bartlett's test, p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable model fit (χ2/df = 2.370; CFI = 0.960; RMSEA = 0.078). The overall scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.911). The subscales' Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.889 for Reward Belief and 0.799 for Punishment Belief. A significant positive correlation was found between belief in divine retribution and religious obsessions (r = 0.426, p < 0.001). These results support the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Belief in Divine Retribution Scale. It can be used to assess individuals' religious belief structures and their tendencies toward religious obsessions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Religion and Health is an international publication concerned with the creative partnership of psychology and religion/sprituality and the relationship between religion/spirituality and both mental and physical health. This multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary journal publishes peer-reviewed original contributions from scholars and professionals of all religious faiths. Articles may be clinical, statistical, theoretical, impressionistic, or anecdotal. Founded in 1961 by the Blanton-Peale Institute, which joins the perspectives of psychology and religion, Journal of Religion and Health explores the most contemporary modes of religious thought with particular emphasis on their relevance to current medical and psychological research.