Evaluating the diagnostic utility of the slide agglutination method for brucellosis in Saudi Arabia: A retrospective study at International Medical Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Pub Date : 2025-10-06 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0013206
Reham Kaki, Hala Zeinelabidin, Sukainah N Rashed, Asmaa Baba
{"title":"Evaluating the diagnostic utility of the slide agglutination method for brucellosis in Saudi Arabia: A retrospective study at International Medical Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Reham Kaki, Hala Zeinelabidin, Sukainah N Rashed, Asmaa Baba","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0013206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brucellosis, a prevalent zoonotic disease in endemic regions like Saudi Arabia, poses diagnostic challenges due to its nonspecific clinical manifestations. This disease is endemic in various regions, including the Mediterranean basin, the Middle East, Asia, Africa, and Latin America. This retrospective study is designed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the slide agglutination method for brucellosis. By examining its sensitivity, specificity, and overall performance, this research will provide insights into the reliability of the slide agglutination method as a diagnostic tool in a high-prevalence setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study, conducted at the International Medical Center, Jeddah, compared the real-world diagnostic performance of the Slide Agglutination Method (SAM) with gold-standard blood cultures and Brucella serology. Over 734 cases (37 Brucella-positive and 697 Brucella-negative) were reviewed between 2019 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SAM achieved 86.5% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity, with an average turnaround time of 2.32 hours. In contrast, blood culture showed 40.9% sensitivity and 94.5% accuracy, and conventional serology demonstrated comparable sensitivity but longer processing times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAM combines speed, simplicity, and robust accuracy, making it an ideal first-line screen for acute brucellosis in endemic, resource-limited settings. However, its performance in chronic or low-titer infections remains less well characterized. Our detailed operational metrics fill a local evidence gap and support the Saudi Ministry of Health in updating national screening guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":49000,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","volume":"19 10","pages":"e0013206"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12500134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Brucellosis, a prevalent zoonotic disease in endemic regions like Saudi Arabia, poses diagnostic challenges due to its nonspecific clinical manifestations. This disease is endemic in various regions, including the Mediterranean basin, the Middle East, Asia, Africa, and Latin America. This retrospective study is designed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the slide agglutination method for brucellosis. By examining its sensitivity, specificity, and overall performance, this research will provide insights into the reliability of the slide agglutination method as a diagnostic tool in a high-prevalence setting.

Methods: This retrospective study, conducted at the International Medical Center, Jeddah, compared the real-world diagnostic performance of the Slide Agglutination Method (SAM) with gold-standard blood cultures and Brucella serology. Over 734 cases (37 Brucella-positive and 697 Brucella-negative) were reviewed between 2019 and 2022.

Results: SAM achieved 86.5% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity, with an average turnaround time of 2.32 hours. In contrast, blood culture showed 40.9% sensitivity and 94.5% accuracy, and conventional serology demonstrated comparable sensitivity but longer processing times.

Conclusion: SAM combines speed, simplicity, and robust accuracy, making it an ideal first-line screen for acute brucellosis in endemic, resource-limited settings. However, its performance in chronic or low-titer infections remains less well characterized. Our detailed operational metrics fill a local evidence gap and support the Saudi Ministry of Health in updating national screening guidelines.

评估载玻片凝集法在沙特阿拉伯布鲁氏菌病的诊断效用:沙特阿拉伯吉达国际医学中心的回顾性研究。
背景:布鲁氏菌病是在沙特阿拉伯等流行地区流行的人畜共患疾病,由于其非特异性临床表现,给诊断带来了挑战。这种疾病在许多地区流行,包括地中海盆地、中东、亚洲、非洲和拉丁美洲。本回顾性研究旨在评估玻片凝集法对布鲁氏菌病的诊断效用。通过检查其敏感性、特异性和整体性能,本研究将深入了解载玻片凝集法作为高患病率环境下诊断工具的可靠性。方法:这项在吉达国际医学中心进行的回顾性研究比较了载玻片凝集法(SAM)与金标准血培养和布鲁氏菌血清学的真实诊断性能。2019年至2022年期间,共审查了734例病例(37例布鲁氏菌阳性,697例布鲁氏菌阴性)。结果:SAM灵敏度为86.5%,特异性为99.3%,平均周转时间为2.32 h。相比之下,血液培养的灵敏度为40.9%,准确度为94.5%,而常规血清学的灵敏度相当,但处理时间较长。结论:SAM结合了快速、简单和可靠的准确性,使其成为在地方性、资源有限的环境中对急性布鲁氏菌病进行理想的一线筛查。然而,它在慢性或低滴度感染中的表现仍然不太清楚。我们详细的操作指标填补了当地证据的空白,并支持沙特卫生部更新国家筛查指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases PARASITOLOGY-TROPICAL MEDICINE
自引率
10.50%
发文量
723
期刊介绍: PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases publishes research devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment and control of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), as well as relevant public policy. The NTDs are defined as a group of poverty-promoting chronic infectious diseases, which primarily occur in rural areas and poor urban areas of low-income and middle-income countries. Their impact on child health and development, pregnancy, and worker productivity, as well as their stigmatizing features limit economic stability. All aspects of these diseases are considered, including: Pathogenesis Clinical features Pharmacology and treatment Diagnosis Epidemiology Vector biology Vaccinology and prevention Demographic, ecological and social determinants Public health and policy aspects (including cost-effectiveness analyses).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信