Building Health Commissioning Capability of Australia's Primary Health Networks -Service Providers' Perspective.

IF 3.8 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Healthcare Leadership Pub Date : 2025-10-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHL.S535737
Zhanming Liang, Amanda Martin, Catherine Louise Turner
{"title":"Building Health Commissioning Capability of Australia's Primary Health Networks -Service Providers' Perspective.","authors":"Zhanming Liang, Amanda Martin, Catherine Louise Turner","doi":"10.2147/JHL.S535737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Australia's health system is strong, but fragmented across primary, secondary, and tertiary care. Primary Health Networks (PHNs) were established to streamline non-hospital-based health services and improve service effectiveness and efficiency across Australia, which can be achieved by fostering strong relationships with providers to build commissioning capabilities. Successful commissioning depends on the providers' ability to respond to commissioning opportunities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify capability development opportunities that support service provider organisations commissioned by PHN to deliver effective and efficient services in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method case study approach was used, including an anonymous online survey and a focus group discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study confirmed the key factors for health commissioning success in the following four dimensions: workforce development, effective engagement, support and guidance, and strong relationships. The study further recommends seven key strategies for capability development, highlighting the need for PHNs to focus on building the capability of primary care organisations to establish strong markets and successfully commission services.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Building strong relationships through effective engagement that features support and guidance for service provider organisations is critical for PHNs' commissioning success. All organisations must work collaboratively and fully appreciate the unique limitations constraining PHNs that impact community needs and health outcomes. Given the variations in the size and function of commissioned service providers, factors such as locally developed service models, program differences, and regional needs should be considered when planning specific capability building activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the challenges faced by provider organisations to support commissioning capability development is imperative for PHNs to successfully commission health and social care services. Identifying key actions to support capability development while building strong relationships and learning from the insights produced by this study will enhance service co-design and collectively strengthen the market's ability to meet the growing health needs of local communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":44346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","volume":"17 ","pages":"493-508"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S535737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Australia's health system is strong, but fragmented across primary, secondary, and tertiary care. Primary Health Networks (PHNs) were established to streamline non-hospital-based health services and improve service effectiveness and efficiency across Australia, which can be achieved by fostering strong relationships with providers to build commissioning capabilities. Successful commissioning depends on the providers' ability to respond to commissioning opportunities.

Objective: This study aimed to identify capability development opportunities that support service provider organisations commissioned by PHN to deliver effective and efficient services in primary care.

Methods: A mixed-method case study approach was used, including an anonymous online survey and a focus group discussion.

Results: The study confirmed the key factors for health commissioning success in the following four dimensions: workforce development, effective engagement, support and guidance, and strong relationships. The study further recommends seven key strategies for capability development, highlighting the need for PHNs to focus on building the capability of primary care organisations to establish strong markets and successfully commission services.

Discussion: Building strong relationships through effective engagement that features support and guidance for service provider organisations is critical for PHNs' commissioning success. All organisations must work collaboratively and fully appreciate the unique limitations constraining PHNs that impact community needs and health outcomes. Given the variations in the size and function of commissioned service providers, factors such as locally developed service models, program differences, and regional needs should be considered when planning specific capability building activities.

Conclusion: Understanding the challenges faced by provider organisations to support commissioning capability development is imperative for PHNs to successfully commission health and social care services. Identifying key actions to support capability development while building strong relationships and learning from the insights produced by this study will enhance service co-design and collectively strengthen the market's ability to meet the growing health needs of local communities.

构建澳大利亚初级卫生网络的卫生委托能力——服务提供者的观点。
澳大利亚的卫生系统很强大,但初级、二级和三级卫生保健分散。建立初级保健网络是为了精简非医院保健服务,提高澳大利亚各地的服务效力和效率,这可以通过促进与提供者的牢固关系来建立委托能力来实现。成功的调试取决于提供商对调试机会的响应能力。目的:本研究旨在确定能力发展机会,以支持PHN委托的服务提供商组织在初级保健中提供有效和高效的服务。方法:采用混合方法的案例研究方法,包括匿名在线调查和焦点小组讨论。结果:该研究确认了卫生委托成功的关键因素在以下四个方面:劳动力发展、有效参与、支持和指导以及牢固的关系。该研究进一步建议了七项能力发展的关键策略,强调phn需要专注于建立初级保健机构的能力,以建立强大的市场和成功的委托服务。讨论:通过有效的参与,为服务提供商组织提供支持和指导,建立牢固的关系,对于phn的调试成功至关重要。所有组织必须协同工作,充分认识到影响社区需求和健康结果的公共卫生网络的独特限制。考虑到委托服务提供商的规模和功能的差异,在规划具体的能力建设活动时,应考虑当地开发的服务模型、项目差异和区域需求等因素。结论:了解提供者组织在支持委托能力发展方面所面临的挑战,对于phn成功委托健康和社会护理服务至关重要。确定支持能力发展的关键行动,同时建立牢固的关系,并从本研究产生的见解中学习,将加强服务协同设计,并共同加强市场满足当地社区日益增长的卫生需求的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Leadership
Journal of Healthcare Leadership HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Efficient and successful modern healthcare depends on a growing group of professionals working together as an interdisciplinary team. However, many forces shape the delivery of healthcare; changes are being driven by the markets, transformations in concepts of health and wellbeing, technology and research and discovery. Dynamic leadership will guide these necessary transformations. The Journal of Healthcare Leadership is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on leadership for the healthcare professions. The publication strives to amalgamate current and future healthcare professionals and managers by providing key insights into leadership progress and challenges to improve patient care. The journal aspires to inform key decision makers and those professionals with ambitions of leadership and management; it seeks to connect professionals who are engaged in similar endeavours and to provide wisdom from those working in other industries. Senior and trainee doctors, nurses and allied healthcare professionals, medical students, healthcare managers and allied leaders are invited to contribute to this publication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信