Assessing admitted patients' preparedness during mass casualty incidents at the hospital - a prospective study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Winston Wolf, Lia Schoenfeld, Maya Siman-Tov, Moran Bodas, Bosmat Hoch, Kholood Abu Hamad, Ronit Bar-Haim, Shachar Laks, Katia Dayan, Mordechai Shimonov, Adam Lee Goldstein
{"title":"Assessing admitted patients' preparedness during mass casualty incidents at the hospital - a prospective study.","authors":"Winston Wolf, Lia Schoenfeld, Maya Siman-Tov, Moran Bodas, Bosmat Hoch, Kholood Abu Hamad, Ronit Bar-Haim, Shachar Laks, Katia Dayan, Mordechai Shimonov, Adam Lee Goldstein","doi":"10.1186/s13584-025-00716-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitalized patients are inherently one of the most vulnerable populations. When the hospital is damaged, this population becomes even more at risk. Violence and natural disasters always have the potential to damage hospitals and other healthcare facilities, creating additional strain on an already catastrophic event. This study presents the preparedness of hospitalized patients during a mass casualty incident in order to understand their perspectives during a time of war in order to prepare, optimize, and to guide policy in order to maintain the highest level of care, efficiency, and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional prospective analysis was conducted for patients admitted during an active war.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 103 patients were analyzed. 77% reported mobility limitations that significantly increased compared to their baseline home status. The majority did not know what to do in a disaster, only 20.4% felt able to take care of themselves in an emergency. 61.7% believed it was important to have CPR or stop-the-bleeding training. The major challenges were getting out of bed (56.9%), mobility help (41.2%), pain, and attachment to IVs/drains (both 25.5%). Older patients, non-Jewish individuals, religious patients, and those without an academic degree were all significantly at higher risk for having less knowledge about what to do if there was a mass casualty incident.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a clear need to better understand the patient perspective, as reflected in specific points identified in this study, in order to optimize hospital preparedness when the hospital itself is a disaster victim.</p>","PeriodicalId":46694,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-025-00716-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospitalized patients are inherently one of the most vulnerable populations. When the hospital is damaged, this population becomes even more at risk. Violence and natural disasters always have the potential to damage hospitals and other healthcare facilities, creating additional strain on an already catastrophic event. This study presents the preparedness of hospitalized patients during a mass casualty incident in order to understand their perspectives during a time of war in order to prepare, optimize, and to guide policy in order to maintain the highest level of care, efficiency, and safety.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional prospective analysis was conducted for patients admitted during an active war.

Results: Data from 103 patients were analyzed. 77% reported mobility limitations that significantly increased compared to their baseline home status. The majority did not know what to do in a disaster, only 20.4% felt able to take care of themselves in an emergency. 61.7% believed it was important to have CPR or stop-the-bleeding training. The major challenges were getting out of bed (56.9%), mobility help (41.2%), pain, and attachment to IVs/drains (both 25.5%). Older patients, non-Jewish individuals, religious patients, and those without an academic degree were all significantly at higher risk for having less knowledge about what to do if there was a mass casualty incident.

Conclusions: There is a clear need to better understand the patient perspective, as reflected in specific points identified in this study, in order to optimize hospital preparedness when the hospital itself is a disaster victim.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估住院病人在医院发生大规模伤亡事件时的准备工作——一项前瞻性研究。
背景:住院患者本质上是最脆弱的人群之一。当医院遭到破坏时,这些人面临的风险更大。暴力和自然灾害总是有可能破坏医院和其他卫生保健设施,在本已灾难性的事件上造成额外的压力。本研究介绍了在大规模伤亡事件中住院病人的准备情况,以便了解他们在战争时期的观点,以便准备、优化和指导政策,以保持最高水平的护理、效率和安全。方法:对战争期间入院的患者进行描述性横断面前瞻性分析。结果:对103例患者的资料进行分析。77%的人报告了与基线家庭状况相比明显增加的行动限制。大多数人不知道在灾难中该怎么做,只有20.4%的人认为自己能够在紧急情况下照顾自己。61.7%的人认为进行心肺复苏术或止血训练很重要。主要的挑战是下床(56.9%)、活动帮助(41.2%)、疼痛和静脉/引流管连接(均为25.5%)。老年患者、非犹太人、有宗教信仰的患者和没有学位的患者都有更高的风险,因为他们对大规模伤亡事件的应对措施知之甚少。结论:显然需要更好地理解患者的观点,正如本研究确定的具体要点所反映的那样,以便在医院本身成为灾难受害者时优化医院的准备工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
38
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信