{"title":"Social Media-Based Cancer Education: Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis.","authors":"Yang Xie, Zhenning Guo, Xiangning Zeng, Denghui Zhai, Gaoqiang Zhai, Yinzhou Feng, Huang Huang","doi":"10.2196/77214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional education for patients with cancer faces challenges related to timeliness, accessibility, and a personalized approach. Social media has emerged as a novel platform for delivering cancer-related educational content, garnering growing academic interest. However, a comprehensive assessment of the current research landscape in this domain is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify research hotspots; trace the evolution of social media-based education for patients with cancer; and map the leading journals, institutions, and international collaboration networks in this field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bibliometric and thematic analysis was conducted using tools, such as VOSviewer, Bibliometrix, and CiteSpace, to examine articles indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection from 2011 to 2025. The analysis explored publication trends, author and institutional collaboration networks, keyword co-occurrence, factor analysis, thematic clusters, and the evolution of disciplinary keyword categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 119 publications were retrieved. The Journal of Medical Internet Research was the most productive journal in this field, publishing 13 articles (10.9%). The University of Minnesota was the most productive institution, contributing 6 publications (5.0%). The United States accounted for the largest proportion of publications (56/119, 47.1%), with 5 of the top 10 institutions based in the country. The United States also led the international collaboration network. Keyword analysis identified key research hotspots, including platform-specific information dissemination, tailored educational interventions for diverse patient populations, efforts to enhance quality of life, and challenges related to health misinformation. Thematic evolution demonstrated a shift from basic information-seeking behaviors to broader topics such as digital health and health equity, indicating a multidimensional and interdisciplinary research trajectory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study represents the first bibliometric analysis of social media-based cancer education, providing actionable insights to inform digital health literacy strategies and advance patient-centered, equitable health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":"11 ","pages":"e77214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/77214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Traditional education for patients with cancer faces challenges related to timeliness, accessibility, and a personalized approach. Social media has emerged as a novel platform for delivering cancer-related educational content, garnering growing academic interest. However, a comprehensive assessment of the current research landscape in this domain is lacking.
Objective: This study aimed to identify research hotspots; trace the evolution of social media-based education for patients with cancer; and map the leading journals, institutions, and international collaboration networks in this field.
Methods: A bibliometric and thematic analysis was conducted using tools, such as VOSviewer, Bibliometrix, and CiteSpace, to examine articles indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection from 2011 to 2025. The analysis explored publication trends, author and institutional collaboration networks, keyword co-occurrence, factor analysis, thematic clusters, and the evolution of disciplinary keyword categories.
Results: A total of 119 publications were retrieved. The Journal of Medical Internet Research was the most productive journal in this field, publishing 13 articles (10.9%). The University of Minnesota was the most productive institution, contributing 6 publications (5.0%). The United States accounted for the largest proportion of publications (56/119, 47.1%), with 5 of the top 10 institutions based in the country. The United States also led the international collaboration network. Keyword analysis identified key research hotspots, including platform-specific information dissemination, tailored educational interventions for diverse patient populations, efforts to enhance quality of life, and challenges related to health misinformation. Thematic evolution demonstrated a shift from basic information-seeking behaviors to broader topics such as digital health and health equity, indicating a multidimensional and interdisciplinary research trajectory.
Conclusions: This study represents the first bibliometric analysis of social media-based cancer education, providing actionable insights to inform digital health literacy strategies and advance patient-centered, equitable health care.
背景:传统的癌症患者教育面临着及时性、可及性和个性化方法方面的挑战。社交媒体已经成为传播癌症相关教育内容的新平台,引起了越来越多的学术兴趣。然而,缺乏对该领域当前研究前景的全面评估。目的:本研究旨在确定研究热点;追踪以社交媒体为基础的癌症患者教育的演变;并绘制出该领域的主要期刊、机构和国际合作网络。方法:利用VOSviewer、Bibliometrix和CiteSpace等工具,对2011 - 2025年被Web of Science核心馆藏收录的文章进行文献计量学和专题分析。该分析探讨了出版趋势、作者与机构合作网络、关键词共现、因子分析、专题集群以及学科关键词类别的演变。结果:共检索到119篇文献。《医学互联网研究杂志》是该领域最多产的杂志,发表了13篇文章(10.9%)。明尼苏达大学是产出最高的机构,贡献了6篇论文(5.0%)。美国发表的论文占比最大(56/119,47.1%),排名前10的机构中有5所位于美国。美国还领导了国际合作网络。关键词分析确定了关键的研究热点,包括特定平台的信息传播、针对不同患者群体的定制教育干预、提高生活质量的努力,以及与健康错误信息相关的挑战。主题演变表明,从基本的信息寻求行为向数字健康和卫生公平等更广泛的主题转变,表明了多维和跨学科的研究轨迹。结论:本研究首次对基于社交媒体的癌症教育进行了文献计量分析,为数字健康素养战略提供了可操作的见解,并促进了以患者为中心的公平医疗保健。