Healthcare seeking with colorectal cancer symptoms-results from two Danish population-based surveys in 2012 and 2022.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Camilla Jøhnk, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl, Lisa Maria Sele Sætre, Rasmus Krøijer, Sonja Wehberg, Peter Fentz Haastrup
{"title":"Healthcare seeking with colorectal cancer symptoms-results from two Danish population-based surveys in 2012 and 2022.","authors":"Camilla Jøhnk, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl, Lisa Maria Sele Sætre, Rasmus Krøijer, Sonja Wehberg, Peter Fentz Haastrup","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2025.2566312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely healthcare seeking with colorectal cancer (CRC) symptoms is crucial for treatment options. This study aims to 1. compare CRC symptom reporting and contact to the general practitioner (GP) in the Danish population in 2012 and 2022, 2. analyze the associations between sex, age and GP contact in 2012 and 2022, and 3. explore considerations about GP contact in 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nationwide surveys on symptoms and GP contact in 2012 and 2022 with 100,000 randomly selected adults invited in each. Four CRC symptom categories, GP contact, and six predefined considerations about GP contact were analyzed by descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 47,423 individuals in 2012, and 28,328 in 2022. Symptom reporting was similar in the two cohorts, whereas GP contact increased significantly. Abdominal pain prompted the highest GP contact in both years (36.1% in 2012; 44.3% in 2022), while changed bowel habits prompted the lowest (20.4% and 24.8%, respectively). Men had lower odds of GP contact than women for most symptom categories, and odds of seeking healthcare increased with age. Among those with no GP contact, half reported either knowing the cause of their symptom or expecting it to resolve on its own. Among those who reported rectal bleeding and no GP contact, 17% described embarrassment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the increased focus on CRC, many individuals with CRC symptoms reported that they knew the cause and expected it to go away on its own, indicating that they might not associate it with serious disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2025.2566312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Timely healthcare seeking with colorectal cancer (CRC) symptoms is crucial for treatment options. This study aims to 1. compare CRC symptom reporting and contact to the general practitioner (GP) in the Danish population in 2012 and 2022, 2. analyze the associations between sex, age and GP contact in 2012 and 2022, and 3. explore considerations about GP contact in 2022.

Methods: Nationwide surveys on symptoms and GP contact in 2012 and 2022 with 100,000 randomly selected adults invited in each. Four CRC symptom categories, GP contact, and six predefined considerations about GP contact were analyzed by descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models.

Results: We included 47,423 individuals in 2012, and 28,328 in 2022. Symptom reporting was similar in the two cohorts, whereas GP contact increased significantly. Abdominal pain prompted the highest GP contact in both years (36.1% in 2012; 44.3% in 2022), while changed bowel habits prompted the lowest (20.4% and 24.8%, respectively). Men had lower odds of GP contact than women for most symptom categories, and odds of seeking healthcare increased with age. Among those with no GP contact, half reported either knowing the cause of their symptom or expecting it to resolve on its own. Among those who reported rectal bleeding and no GP contact, 17% described embarrassment.

Conclusion: Despite the increased focus on CRC, many individuals with CRC symptoms reported that they knew the cause and expected it to go away on its own, indicating that they might not associate it with serious disease.

2012年和2022年丹麦两项基于人群的调查结果显示,有结直肠癌症状的患者寻求医疗保健。
背景:及时就医结直肠癌(CRC)的症状是治疗方案的关键。本研究旨在:1。比较2012年和2022年丹麦人群的结直肠癌症状报告和与全科医生(GP)的接触,2。2 .分析2012年和2022年性别、年龄与全科就诊的关系;探讨2022年GP接触的考虑。方法:2012年和2022年在全国范围内随机抽取10万名成人进行症状和全科医生接触调查。通过描述性统计和多变量logistic回归模型分析了四种CRC症状类别、GP接触情况和关于GP接触的六种预定义考虑因素。结果:2012年我们纳入了47,423人,2022年纳入了28,328人。在两个队列中,症状报告相似,而GP接触显著增加。在这两年中,腹痛导致就诊的比例最高(2012年为36.1%,2022年为44.3%),而改变排便习惯的比例最低(分别为20.4%和24.8%)。在大多数症状类别中,男性与全科医生联系的几率低于女性,而且寻求医疗保健的几率随着年龄的增长而增加。在那些没有全科医生联系的人中,有一半的人报告说他们知道症状的原因,或者期望症状自行消退。在报告直肠出血和没有全科医生联系的人中,17%的人描述了尴尬。结论:尽管对结直肠癌的关注越来越多,但许多有结直肠癌症状的个体报告说,他们知道结直肠癌的原因,并期望结直肠癌会自行消失,这表明他们可能不会将结直肠癌与严重疾病联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信