{"title":"The impact of nurse practitioner-led wound clinic for under-resourced populations: A retrospective study.","authors":"Tuba Sengul, Dilek Yilmaz Akyaz, Oleg Teleten, Jeff Souza, Holly Kirkland-Kyhn","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000001207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic wounds represent a significant health care burden, particularly among under-resourced people, due to limited access to care, social determinants, and untreated comorbidities. These factors contribute to delayed healing, complications, reduced quality of life, and increased costs.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the types of chronic wounds, barriers to care, and clinical outcomes among under-resourced individuals treated at a nurse practitioner-led (NP-led) wound care clinic, to inform targeted interventions for improving access and continuity.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed medical records of 493 patients treated at a NP-led clinic on the west coast between 2020 and 2024, focusing on wound types, care barriers, and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common diagnoses were nonpressure chronic ulcers (17.6%) and pressure injuries (16.6%), with lower extremities as the main location (20.49%). A strong correlation was found between number of appointments and follow-up (r = 1.0). No significant relationship was seen between referral source and clinic visit status (χ2 = 2.67, p = .26). Overall, 91.9% of wounds healed, whereas 16.8% of patients experienced persistent wound issues, reflecting barriers such as inaccessibility (17%) and refusal of care (5.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NP-led wound clinics are essential for under-resourced populations but face systemic challenges in patient follow-up and engagement. Findings highlight the need for interventions, improved continuity, and strategies addressing health care and social determinants.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Enhancing continuity, fostering patient trust, and addressing social determinants through remote monitoring, community outreach, and tailored approaches are vital to optimize outcomes for under-resourced individuals with chronic wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":17179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000001207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Chronic wounds represent a significant health care burden, particularly among under-resourced people, due to limited access to care, social determinants, and untreated comorbidities. These factors contribute to delayed healing, complications, reduced quality of life, and increased costs.
Purpose: This study examined the types of chronic wounds, barriers to care, and clinical outcomes among under-resourced individuals treated at a nurse practitioner-led (NP-led) wound care clinic, to inform targeted interventions for improving access and continuity.
Methodology: This retrospective cohort study analyzed medical records of 493 patients treated at a NP-led clinic on the west coast between 2020 and 2024, focusing on wound types, care barriers, and clinical outcomes.
Results: The most common diagnoses were nonpressure chronic ulcers (17.6%) and pressure injuries (16.6%), with lower extremities as the main location (20.49%). A strong correlation was found between number of appointments and follow-up (r = 1.0). No significant relationship was seen between referral source and clinic visit status (χ2 = 2.67, p = .26). Overall, 91.9% of wounds healed, whereas 16.8% of patients experienced persistent wound issues, reflecting barriers such as inaccessibility (17%) and refusal of care (5.7%).
Conclusions: NP-led wound clinics are essential for under-resourced populations but face systemic challenges in patient follow-up and engagement. Findings highlight the need for interventions, improved continuity, and strategies addressing health care and social determinants.
Implications: Enhancing continuity, fostering patient trust, and addressing social determinants through remote monitoring, community outreach, and tailored approaches are vital to optimize outcomes for under-resourced individuals with chronic wounds.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners.
Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.