Differential Effects of Lower Extremity Length Discrepancy on Functional and Structural Scoliosis: Coronal and Sagittal Plane Analysis.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Yifan Huang, Yi Zhang, Jie Chang, Feng Han, Xiangshui Sun
{"title":"Differential Effects of Lower Extremity Length Discrepancy on Functional and Structural Scoliosis: Coronal and Sagittal Plane Analysis.","authors":"Yifan Huang, Yi Zhang, Jie Chang, Feng Han, Xiangshui Sun","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000003130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lower extremity length discrepancy (LELD) is closely associated with spinal imbalances such as pelvic tilt and functional scoliosis. While existing studies have focused on LELD-induced coronal compensations, its impact on sagittal spinal balance remains poorly understood. The aim of the current study was to investigate the differential effects of LELD on coronal and sagittal spinal balance in adolescents with functional versus structural scoliosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 211 patients was conducted. Participants were stratified into functional (n=165) or structural scoliosis (n=46) groups based on pelvic and lumbar correction with limb elevation. Radiographic parameters included coronal and sagittal measures. Statistical analyses compared groups and assessed correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Structural scoliosis exhibited significantly worse coronal imbalance (higher sacral obliquity, lumbar Cobb angle, and coronal balance distance; P<0.001) and greater sagittal vertical axis (SVA; P<0.05). LELD correlated with coronal parameters in functional scoliosis (P<0.05) but not structural cases. Sagittal balance parameters (pelvic tilt, sacral slope) showed no LELD association, though SVA correlated with coronal imbalance only in functional scoliosis (P<0.05). Roussouly's sagittal classification did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LELD primarily drives compensatory coronal changes, with minimal sagittal impact. Structural scoliosis demonstrates worse coronal imbalance and elevated SVA, suggesting distinct compensatory mechanisms. Functional cases may benefit from LELD correction, while structural scoliosis requires sagittal evaluation during surgical planning. These findings highlight the importance of prioritizing coronal alignment in LELD-related scoliosis management.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000003130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lower extremity length discrepancy (LELD) is closely associated with spinal imbalances such as pelvic tilt and functional scoliosis. While existing studies have focused on LELD-induced coronal compensations, its impact on sagittal spinal balance remains poorly understood. The aim of the current study was to investigate the differential effects of LELD on coronal and sagittal spinal balance in adolescents with functional versus structural scoliosis.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 211 patients was conducted. Participants were stratified into functional (n=165) or structural scoliosis (n=46) groups based on pelvic and lumbar correction with limb elevation. Radiographic parameters included coronal and sagittal measures. Statistical analyses compared groups and assessed correlations.

Results: Structural scoliosis exhibited significantly worse coronal imbalance (higher sacral obliquity, lumbar Cobb angle, and coronal balance distance; P<0.001) and greater sagittal vertical axis (SVA; P<0.05). LELD correlated with coronal parameters in functional scoliosis (P<0.05) but not structural cases. Sagittal balance parameters (pelvic tilt, sacral slope) showed no LELD association, though SVA correlated with coronal imbalance only in functional scoliosis (P<0.05). Roussouly's sagittal classification did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: LELD primarily drives compensatory coronal changes, with minimal sagittal impact. Structural scoliosis demonstrates worse coronal imbalance and elevated SVA, suggesting distinct compensatory mechanisms. Functional cases may benefit from LELD correction, while structural scoliosis requires sagittal evaluation during surgical planning. These findings highlight the importance of prioritizing coronal alignment in LELD-related scoliosis management.

Level of evidence: Level III.

下肢长度差异对功能性和结构性脊柱侧凸的不同影响:冠状面和矢状面分析。
背景:下肢长度差异(LELD)与骨盆倾斜和功能性脊柱侧凸等脊柱不平衡密切相关。虽然现有的研究主要集中在lld诱导的冠状代偿上,但其对矢状面脊柱平衡的影响仍然知之甚少。本研究的目的是研究LELD对青少年功能性和结构性脊柱侧凸冠状和矢状面脊柱平衡的不同影响。方法:对211例患者进行回顾性分析。参与者被分为功能性(n=165)或结构性脊柱侧凸(n=46)组,基于骨盆和腰椎矫正和肢体抬高。影像学参数包括冠状位和矢状位测量。统计分析比较各组并评估相关性。结果:结构性脊柱侧凸表现出更严重的冠状不平衡(更高的骶骨倾角、腰椎Cobb角和冠状平衡距离);结论:LELD主要驱动代偿性冠状改变,矢状面影响最小。结构性脊柱侧凸表现出更严重的冠状动脉失衡和SVA升高,提示不同的代偿机制。功能性病例可能受益于lld矫正,而结构性脊柱侧凸则需要在手术计划时进行矢状面评估。这些发现强调了在lld相关脊柱侧凸治疗中优先考虑冠状位对齐的重要性。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信