HALP and FI-Lab Scores in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Adverse Outcomes.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Masaaki Nagae, Hiroyuki Umegaki, Hirotaka Nakashima, Tatsuya Nishiuchi
{"title":"HALP and FI-Lab Scores in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Adverse Outcomes.","authors":"Masaaki Nagae, Hiroyuki Umegaki, Hirotaka Nakashima, Tatsuya Nishiuchi","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09889-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early identification of poor prognosis in acutely hospitalized older adults is essential. Hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) scores have garnered attention as a predictor of poor prognosis in both cancer and non-cancer patients. The frailty index-laboratory (FI-lab) has also demonstrated utility as an indicator of unfavorable outcomes. Associations have been established between low HALP levels and high FI-lab scores with adverse outcomes. However, no study has yet compared these indicators to predict outcomes in hospitalized older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study involved older adults admitted to a 730-bed tertiary hospital. The study encompassed patients aged 65 years or older admitted to the general internal medicine department and discharged between August 2020 and July 2023. The HALP score and FI-lab were computed based on laboratory parameters derived from blood tests conducted upon admission. The study assessed outcomes including in-hospital mortality, in-hospital falls, discharge to home, and length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1346 patients, of whom 11.6% died during hospitalization. The FI-lab score was more predictive of in-hospital death than the HALP score. In Cox regression survival analysis, higher FI-lab scores (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.47-1.96, p < 0.01) and lower HALP scores (hazard ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.12-2.33, p < 0.01) were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. Moreover, higher FI-lab scores and low HALP scores were linked to a prolonged hospital stay and reduced likelihood of discharge. In contrast, none of these indicators was correlated with in-hospital falls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FI-lab demonstrated superior predictive capability for in-hospital mortality compared to the HALP score. However, the HALP score also proved effective in forecasting adverse outcomes among older adults hospitalized in general internal medicine wards. Automatically calculable laboratory scores could offer significant value in caring for diverse older inpatients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09889-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early identification of poor prognosis in acutely hospitalized older adults is essential. Hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) scores have garnered attention as a predictor of poor prognosis in both cancer and non-cancer patients. The frailty index-laboratory (FI-lab) has also demonstrated utility as an indicator of unfavorable outcomes. Associations have been established between low HALP levels and high FI-lab scores with adverse outcomes. However, no study has yet compared these indicators to predict outcomes in hospitalized older adults.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved older adults admitted to a 730-bed tertiary hospital. The study encompassed patients aged 65 years or older admitted to the general internal medicine department and discharged between August 2020 and July 2023. The HALP score and FI-lab were computed based on laboratory parameters derived from blood tests conducted upon admission. The study assessed outcomes including in-hospital mortality, in-hospital falls, discharge to home, and length of hospital stay.

Results: A total of 1346 patients, of whom 11.6% died during hospitalization. The FI-lab score was more predictive of in-hospital death than the HALP score. In Cox regression survival analysis, higher FI-lab scores (hazard ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.47-1.96, p < 0.01) and lower HALP scores (hazard ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.12-2.33, p < 0.01) were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. Moreover, higher FI-lab scores and low HALP scores were linked to a prolonged hospital stay and reduced likelihood of discharge. In contrast, none of these indicators was correlated with in-hospital falls.

Conclusions: The FI-lab demonstrated superior predictive capability for in-hospital mortality compared to the HALP score. However, the HALP score also proved effective in forecasting adverse outcomes among older adults hospitalized in general internal medicine wards. Automatically calculable laboratory scores could offer significant value in caring for diverse older inpatients.

住院老年人的HALP和FI-Lab评分:不良结局的回顾性比较研究
背景:早期识别急性住院老年人的不良预后是至关重要的。血红蛋白、白蛋白、淋巴细胞和血小板(HALP)评分作为癌症和非癌症患者预后不良的预测指标已经引起了人们的关注。虚弱指数实验室(FI-lab)也证明了作为不利结果指标的效用。低HALP水平和高FI-lab评分与不良结果之间存在关联。然而,目前还没有研究比较这些指标来预测住院老年人的预后。方法:这项回顾性队列研究涉及一家拥有730张床位的三级医院的老年人。该研究纳入了2020年8月至2023年7月期间在普通内科住院并出院的65岁及以上的患者。HALP评分和FI-lab是根据入院时进行的血液检查得出的实验室参数计算的。该研究评估的结果包括院内死亡率、院内跌倒、出院回家和住院时间。结果:共1346例患者,其中11.6%在住院期间死亡。FI-lab评分比HALP评分更能预测院内死亡。在Cox回归生存分析中,较高的FI-lab评分(风险比1.70,95%可信区间1.47-1.96,p)结论:与HALP评分相比,FI-lab对院内死亡率的预测能力更强。然而,在普通内科病房住院的老年人中,HALP评分也被证明是有效的预测不良后果。自动计算的实验室分数可以为照顾不同的老年住院病人提供重要的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信