Longitudinal Adherence to Screening for Colorectal, Cervical, and Lung Cancer in a US Consortium.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ethan A Halm, Natalie J Del Vecchio, Katharine A Rendle, Jasmin A Tiro, Yingye Zheng, Rachel L Winer, Jennifer S Haas, Douglas A Corley, Celette Sugg Skinner, Joanne Schottinger, Nirupa R Ghai, Jessica Chubak
{"title":"Longitudinal Adherence to Screening for Colorectal, Cervical, and Lung Cancer in a US Consortium.","authors":"Ethan A Halm, Natalie J Del Vecchio, Katharine A Rendle, Jasmin A Tiro, Yingye Zheng, Rachel L Winer, Jennifer S Haas, Douglas A Corley, Celette Sugg Skinner, Joanne Schottinger, Nirupa R Ghai, Jessica Chubak","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09835-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective screening for colorectal, cervical, and lung cancer requires adherence over time, but little is known about repeat testing in real-world practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe patterns of longitudinal screening adherence and identify patient and system factors associated with repeat testing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of colorectal, cervical, or lung cancer screening in 2010-2019.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults eligible for repeat colorectal (stool-based), cervical, or lung cancer screening following a negative index test in ten regional health systems comprising the US PROSPR consortium.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Repeat screening based on guideline-recommended intervals. For the colorectal and lung cohorts with opportunities for multiple annual screening rounds, the main outcome was repeat screening categorized as none, inconsistent, or consistent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample size was: 1,566,346 for colorectal, 216,344 for cervical, and 6,209 for lung cancer screening. For colorectal, cervical, and lung screeners, mean age at index was 58.2, 39.4, and 64.6 years, respectively, and 49%, 55% and 30% were Hispanic and/or non-white. Completion of the next screening round was 62% for colorectal, 56% for cervical, and 56% for lung cancer. For colorectal, over the next two rounds of testing, 53% were consistent, 33% inconsistent, and 14% no repeat screeners. The comparable percentages over 3 + rounds for colorectal were 40% consistent, 50% inconsistent, and 11% no repeat screeners. For lung, over the next two rounds, 47% were consistent, 31% inconsistent, and 22% no repeat screeners. The proportions over 3 + rounds for lung were 44% consistent, 42% inconsistent, and 14% no repeat screening. The health system was the strongest predictor of repeat and consistent testing with three- to ten-fold variation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adherence to longitudinal screening for colorectal, cervical and lung cancer was suboptimal, particularly as the number of testing rounds increased. System-level strategies are needed to increase screening adherence given the strong relationship between health system and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09835-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective screening for colorectal, cervical, and lung cancer requires adherence over time, but little is known about repeat testing in real-world practice.

Objective: Describe patterns of longitudinal screening adherence and identify patient and system factors associated with repeat testing.

Design: Retrospective cohort study of colorectal, cervical, or lung cancer screening in 2010-2019.

Participants: Adults eligible for repeat colorectal (stool-based), cervical, or lung cancer screening following a negative index test in ten regional health systems comprising the US PROSPR consortium.

Main measures: Repeat screening based on guideline-recommended intervals. For the colorectal and lung cohorts with opportunities for multiple annual screening rounds, the main outcome was repeat screening categorized as none, inconsistent, or consistent.

Results: The sample size was: 1,566,346 for colorectal, 216,344 for cervical, and 6,209 for lung cancer screening. For colorectal, cervical, and lung screeners, mean age at index was 58.2, 39.4, and 64.6 years, respectively, and 49%, 55% and 30% were Hispanic and/or non-white. Completion of the next screening round was 62% for colorectal, 56% for cervical, and 56% for lung cancer. For colorectal, over the next two rounds of testing, 53% were consistent, 33% inconsistent, and 14% no repeat screeners. The comparable percentages over 3 + rounds for colorectal were 40% consistent, 50% inconsistent, and 11% no repeat screeners. For lung, over the next two rounds, 47% were consistent, 31% inconsistent, and 22% no repeat screeners. The proportions over 3 + rounds for lung were 44% consistent, 42% inconsistent, and 14% no repeat screening. The health system was the strongest predictor of repeat and consistent testing with three- to ten-fold variation.

Conclusions: Adherence to longitudinal screening for colorectal, cervical and lung cancer was suboptimal, particularly as the number of testing rounds increased. System-level strategies are needed to increase screening adherence given the strong relationship between health system and outcomes.

一项美国研究表明,结直肠癌、宫颈癌和肺癌筛查的纵向依从性。
背景:结直肠癌、宫颈癌和肺癌的有效筛查需要长期坚持,但在现实世界的实践中对重复检测知之甚少。目的:描述纵向筛查依从性的模式,并确定与重复检测相关的患者和系统因素。设计:2010-2019年结直肠癌、宫颈癌或肺癌筛查的回顾性队列研究。参与者:在包括美国PROSPR联盟的十个地区卫生系统中进行阴性指数测试后,符合重复结肠直肠癌(基于粪便),宫颈癌或肺癌筛查的成年人。主要措施:根据指南推荐的间隔重复筛查。对于有机会进行多次年度筛查的结直肠和肺部队列,主要结果是重复筛查,分类为无、不一致或一致。结果:样本量为:结直肠癌1,566,346例,宫颈癌216,344例,肺癌6,209例。结直肠、宫颈和肺部筛查者的平均年龄分别为58.2岁、39.4岁和64.6岁,其中49%、55%和30%为西班牙裔和/或非白人。结肠直肠癌下一轮筛查的完成率为62%,宫颈癌为56%,肺癌为56%。对于结直肠,在接下来的两轮测试中,53%的结果一致,33%不一致,14%没有重复筛查。超过3轮以上的结肠直肠癌的可比百分比为40%一致,50%不一致,11%没有重复筛查。对于肺部,在接下来的两轮中,47%的人一致,31%的人不一致,22%的人没有重复筛查。超过3轮以上的肺部比例为44%一致,42%不一致,14%没有重复筛查。卫生系统是重复和一致检测的最强预测因子,具有3到10倍的差异。结论:坚持结肠直肠癌、宫颈癌和肺癌的纵向筛查是次优的,特别是随着检测轮次的增加。鉴于卫生系统与结果之间的密切关系,需要制定系统级战略来提高筛查依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信