Psychometric Evaluation of the Korean Social Health Scale for the Elderly: A Rasch Analysis of Item Level Validity.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Seungju Lim, Yebin Han, Ji-Hyuk Park
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Korean Social Health Scale for the Elderly: A Rasch Analysis of Item Level Validity.","authors":"Seungju Lim, Yebin Han, Ji-Hyuk Park","doi":"10.1111/jep.70275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale, aims and objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Korean Social Health Scale for the Elderly (K-SHSE) using Rasch analysis, to ensure its validity and reliability in measuring social health among older Korean adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 300 community-dwelling adults aged 55 and older in Korea completed the K-SHSE through an online survey. Rasch analysis was conducted using the Partial Credit Model to assess unidimensionality, item fit, difficulty hierarchy, rating scale functioning, precision and differential item functioning (DIF). Analyses were performed separately for the three subdomains: Social Support (SS), Social Adjustment (SA), and Perceived Environmental Resources (PER).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 25 original items, 10 were excluded due to misfits statistics. The final scale retained 15 items across the three subdomains. All subdomains satisfied the assumption of unidimensionality. The SS domain demonstrated strong reliability and person separation, while the SA and PER domains showed limited discriminative ability. Four items displayed statistically significant DIF by sex. The item difficulty hierarchy aligned with theoretical expectations, and no significant floor or ceiling effects were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All domains of the K-SHSE demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties for assessing social health among older adults in Korea, with particularly strong performance in the SS domain. Although some items exhibited DIF or showed limited reliability, their inclusion did not bias the measurement model. These findings support the use of the K-SHSE as a valid and reliable tool for evaluating social health in both research and practical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 7","pages":"e70275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70275","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives: This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Korean Social Health Scale for the Elderly (K-SHSE) using Rasch analysis, to ensure its validity and reliability in measuring social health among older Korean adults.

Methods: A total of 300 community-dwelling adults aged 55 and older in Korea completed the K-SHSE through an online survey. Rasch analysis was conducted using the Partial Credit Model to assess unidimensionality, item fit, difficulty hierarchy, rating scale functioning, precision and differential item functioning (DIF). Analyses were performed separately for the three subdomains: Social Support (SS), Social Adjustment (SA), and Perceived Environmental Resources (PER).

Results: Of the 25 original items, 10 were excluded due to misfits statistics. The final scale retained 15 items across the three subdomains. All subdomains satisfied the assumption of unidimensionality. The SS domain demonstrated strong reliability and person separation, while the SA and PER domains showed limited discriminative ability. Four items displayed statistically significant DIF by sex. The item difficulty hierarchy aligned with theoretical expectations, and no significant floor or ceiling effects were observed.

Conclusion: All domains of the K-SHSE demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties for assessing social health among older adults in Korea, with particularly strong performance in the SS domain. Although some items exhibited DIF or showed limited reliability, their inclusion did not bias the measurement model. These findings support the use of the K-SHSE as a valid and reliable tool for evaluating social health in both research and practical settings.

韩国老年人社会健康量表的心理测量评价:项目水平效度的Rasch分析。
基本原理、目的和目的:本研究旨在运用Rasch分析法评估韩国老年人社会健康量表(K-SHSE)的心理测量特性,以确保其在测量韩国老年人社会健康方面的效度和信度。方法:韩国共有300名55岁及以上的社区居民通过在线调查完成了K-SHSE。采用部分信用模型进行Rasch分析,评估单维性、项目契合度、难度等级、评定量表功能、精度和差异项目功能(DIF)。对三个子领域:社会支持(SS)、社会适应(SA)和感知环境资源(PER)分别进行分析。结果:25个原始条目中,有10个因不符合统计而被排除。最终的量表在三个子域中保留了15个项目。所有子域都满足单维假设。SS域具有较强的可靠性和人分离性,而SA和PER域具有有限的区分能力。按性别划分,有四个项目的DIF具有统计学意义。项目难度等级与理论预期一致,没有观察到明显的下限或上限效应。结论:K-SHSE的所有领域都表现出可接受的心理测量特性,用于评估韩国老年人的社会健康,其中SS领域的表现尤为突出。虽然一些显示DIF or的项目显示有限的信度,但它们的纳入并未使测量模型产生偏倚。这些发现支持在研究和实际环境中使用K-SHSE作为评估社会健康的有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信