M Sumathi, S Sahana, S Sri Raja Rajeswari, V Kruthi, S P Raja
{"title":"Enhancing Diabetes Prediction With Minimal Processing Time Using Catboost: A Comparative Study.","authors":"M Sumathi, S Sahana, S Sri Raja Rajeswari, V Kruthi, S P Raja","doi":"10.1111/jep.70284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease that presents significant health challenges worldwide. Accurate diabetes prediction facilitates early intervention and personalized healthcare strategies, thereby improving patient care and reducing healthcare processing costs. Ensemble-based machine learning (ML) methods enhance predictive performance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study explores various ML classifiers, both individually and in ensemble configurations, including decision trees, random forests, k-nearest neighbors, Naive Bayes, AdaBoost (AB), XGBoost (XB), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) for prediction. The performance of each method is evaluated through rigorous experimentation and comparative analysis across multiple aspects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The performance of the best ML model, MLP, is compared with that of the proposed CatBoost classifier and the ensemble model to identify the most effective approach for diabetes prediction in minimal duration. The proposed CatBoost classifier's execution time of 4.27 s, which is approximately 98.64% faster than the ensemble model's 314.96 s. This demonstrates CatBoost's significant advantage in computational efficiency over ensemble-based classifiers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By leveraging the diverse and complementary strengths of ML classifiers, this study contributes to the advancement of precision medicine and personalized healthcare for individuals at risk of diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 7","pages":"e70284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease that presents significant health challenges worldwide. Accurate diabetes prediction facilitates early intervention and personalized healthcare strategies, thereby improving patient care and reducing healthcare processing costs. Ensemble-based machine learning (ML) methods enhance predictive performance.
Method: This study explores various ML classifiers, both individually and in ensemble configurations, including decision trees, random forests, k-nearest neighbors, Naive Bayes, AdaBoost (AB), XGBoost (XB), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) for prediction. The performance of each method is evaluated through rigorous experimentation and comparative analysis across multiple aspects.
Results: The performance of the best ML model, MLP, is compared with that of the proposed CatBoost classifier and the ensemble model to identify the most effective approach for diabetes prediction in minimal duration. The proposed CatBoost classifier's execution time of 4.27 s, which is approximately 98.64% faster than the ensemble model's 314.96 s. This demonstrates CatBoost's significant advantage in computational efficiency over ensemble-based classifiers.
Conclusion: By leveraging the diverse and complementary strengths of ML classifiers, this study contributes to the advancement of precision medicine and personalized healthcare for individuals at risk of diabetes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.