Xiaoyun Zhang, Xi Meng, Siyu Wang, Qing Lin, Yueyue Wang, Yu Xiang, Kan Wang, Xuan Zhao, Mian Li, Tiange Wang, Zhiyun Zhao, Jieli Lu, Min Xu, Jie Zheng, Yufang Bi, Yu Xu
{"title":"Changes in frailty, intensive blood pressure treatment, and risks of adverse clinical outcomes: a post hoc analysis of the SPRINT trial.","authors":"Xiaoyun Zhang, Xi Meng, Siyu Wang, Qing Lin, Yueyue Wang, Yu Xiang, Kan Wang, Xuan Zhao, Mian Li, Tiange Wang, Zhiyun Zhao, Jieli Lu, Min Xu, Jie Zheng, Yufang Bi, Yu Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04382-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty is becoming a common health issue and its status changes overtime. However, the impact of the frailty status changes on clinical outcomes is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the association between changes in frailty status and adverse clinical outcomes, and to determine whether the changes modify the effects of intensive blood pressure (BP) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using frailty index (FI) defined by the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), participants were categorized as frail (FI > 0.21) or robust (FI ≤ 0.21). Changes in frailty were evaluated by frailty status at baseline and at 12 months. Participants were categorized as stable-robust, robust-to-frail, frail-to-robust, and stable-frail. Outcomes included incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), all-cause mortality, and serious adverse events (SAEs). Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the association between frailty changes and outcomes, and potential modifications of the changes on intensive BP-lowering treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 7924 eligible SPRINT participants were included. Compared with stable-robust participants, robust-to-frail participants had 70%, 103%, and 47% increased risks of CVD (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-2.41), all-cause mortality (HR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.22-3.37), and SAEs (HR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.17-1.84), respectively. Compared with stable-frail participants, a 52% decreased risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.95) was observed in frail-to-robust participants. Changes in frailty did not modify the effects of intensive BP-lowering treatment on CVD, mortality, and SAEs (all P values for interaction > 0.05). In stable-robust participants, intensive BP-lowering treatment was associated with a reduced risk of major CVD events by 41% (HR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.42-0.83), a reduced risk of all-cause mortality by 46% (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.31-0.95), and an increased risk of SAEs by 22% (HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.00-1.48) compared with standard BP-lowering treatment. Similar effects of intensive vs. standard BP-lowering treatment were found in participants with robust-to-frail, frail-to-robust, and stable-frail status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Changes in frailty were associated with changed risks of clinical outcomes. Intensive BP-lowering treatment reduced CVD and mortality regardless of frailty status changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"536"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04382-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Frailty is becoming a common health issue and its status changes overtime. However, the impact of the frailty status changes on clinical outcomes is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the association between changes in frailty status and adverse clinical outcomes, and to determine whether the changes modify the effects of intensive blood pressure (BP) treatment.
Methods: Using frailty index (FI) defined by the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), participants were categorized as frail (FI > 0.21) or robust (FI ≤ 0.21). Changes in frailty were evaluated by frailty status at baseline and at 12 months. Participants were categorized as stable-robust, robust-to-frail, frail-to-robust, and stable-frail. Outcomes included incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), all-cause mortality, and serious adverse events (SAEs). Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the association between frailty changes and outcomes, and potential modifications of the changes on intensive BP-lowering treatment.
Results: Overall, 7924 eligible SPRINT participants were included. Compared with stable-robust participants, robust-to-frail participants had 70%, 103%, and 47% increased risks of CVD (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-2.41), all-cause mortality (HR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.22-3.37), and SAEs (HR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.17-1.84), respectively. Compared with stable-frail participants, a 52% decreased risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.95) was observed in frail-to-robust participants. Changes in frailty did not modify the effects of intensive BP-lowering treatment on CVD, mortality, and SAEs (all P values for interaction > 0.05). In stable-robust participants, intensive BP-lowering treatment was associated with a reduced risk of major CVD events by 41% (HR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.42-0.83), a reduced risk of all-cause mortality by 46% (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.31-0.95), and an increased risk of SAEs by 22% (HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.00-1.48) compared with standard BP-lowering treatment. Similar effects of intensive vs. standard BP-lowering treatment were found in participants with robust-to-frail, frail-to-robust, and stable-frail status.
Conclusions: Changes in frailty were associated with changed risks of clinical outcomes. Intensive BP-lowering treatment reduced CVD and mortality regardless of frailty status changes.
期刊介绍:
BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.