Predicting hematologic toxicity in advanced cervical cancer patients using interpretable machine learning models based on radiomics and dosimetrics.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Jun Zhu, Qionghui Zhou, Luqiao Chen, Zhipeng He, Jianfeng Tan, Jinmeng Pang, Qianxi Ni
{"title":"Predicting hematologic toxicity in advanced cervical cancer patients using interpretable machine learning models based on radiomics and dosimetrics.","authors":"Jun Zhu, Qionghui Zhou, Luqiao Chen, Zhipeng He, Jianfeng Tan, Jinmeng Pang, Qianxi Ni","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-14999-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Hematologic toxicity (HT) is a common and serious side effect for advanced cervical cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy. Accurately predicting HT can significantly improve patient management and treatment outcomes. This study aims to develop and evaluate interpretable machine learning models that use radiomic and dosimetric features to predict HT in advanced cervical cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Retrospectively collected general clinical data, planning CT images, and dose files from 205 patients with advanced cervical cancer who underwent chemoradiotherapy, and classified them according to the severity of HT. Radiomics and dosiomics features were extracted from the same region of interest, and feature selection was performed using a random forest algorithm. Radiomics models, dosiomics models, and hybrid models were then constructed based on extreme gradient boosting trees. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the classification performance of the models. Finally, SHAP values were used to perform interpretability analysis on the best model to enhance the transparency and practicality of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values for the radiomics model were 0.42, 0.86, and 0.78, respectively, while those for the dosiomics model were 0.50, 0.90, and 0.74. In contrast, the hybrid model exhibited superior classification performance with sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values of 0.50, 0.83, and 0.83, respectively. Compared to the standalone radiomics and dosiomics models, the hybrid model demonstrated enhanced classification capability. Interpretability analysis based on SHAP values not only provided a ranking of feature importance and the distribution of feature impacts on model outputs but also elucidated the specific decision-making processes influenced by these features and the interactions between them. This enables clinicians to gain a more intuitive understanding of the model's decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with advanced cervical cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy, the integration of radiomics and dosiomics features can significantly enhance the classification performance of predictive models, thereby holding considerable potential for refining patient treatment strategies. Interpretability analysis based on SHAP values can aid clinicians in more readily understanding the model's decisions, thus promoting the effective implementation of the model in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"1516"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14999-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Hematologic toxicity (HT) is a common and serious side effect for advanced cervical cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy. Accurately predicting HT can significantly improve patient management and treatment outcomes. This study aims to develop and evaluate interpretable machine learning models that use radiomic and dosimetric features to predict HT in advanced cervical cancer patients.

Methods and materials: Retrospectively collected general clinical data, planning CT images, and dose files from 205 patients with advanced cervical cancer who underwent chemoradiotherapy, and classified them according to the severity of HT. Radiomics and dosiomics features were extracted from the same region of interest, and feature selection was performed using a random forest algorithm. Radiomics models, dosiomics models, and hybrid models were then constructed based on extreme gradient boosting trees. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the classification performance of the models. Finally, SHAP values were used to perform interpretability analysis on the best model to enhance the transparency and practicality of the model.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values for the radiomics model were 0.42, 0.86, and 0.78, respectively, while those for the dosiomics model were 0.50, 0.90, and 0.74. In contrast, the hybrid model exhibited superior classification performance with sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values of 0.50, 0.83, and 0.83, respectively. Compared to the standalone radiomics and dosiomics models, the hybrid model demonstrated enhanced classification capability. Interpretability analysis based on SHAP values not only provided a ranking of feature importance and the distribution of feature impacts on model outputs but also elucidated the specific decision-making processes influenced by these features and the interactions between them. This enables clinicians to gain a more intuitive understanding of the model's decisions.

Conclusions: For patients with advanced cervical cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy, the integration of radiomics and dosiomics features can significantly enhance the classification performance of predictive models, thereby holding considerable potential for refining patient treatment strategies. Interpretability analysis based on SHAP values can aid clinicians in more readily understanding the model's decisions, thus promoting the effective implementation of the model in clinical practice.

使用基于放射组学和剂量学的可解释机器学习模型预测晚期宫颈癌患者的血液毒性。
背景与目的:血液学毒性(HT)是晚期宫颈癌患者接受放化疗时常见且严重的副作用。准确预测高温疗法可显著改善患者管理和治疗效果。本研究旨在开发和评估可解释的机器学习模型,该模型使用放射学和剂量学特征来预测晚期宫颈癌患者的HT。方法与材料:回顾性收集205例接受放化疗的晚期宫颈癌患者的一般临床资料、计划CT图像及剂量档案,并根据HT的严重程度进行分类。从同一感兴趣区域提取放射组学和剂量组学特征,并使用随机森林算法进行特征选择。然后基于极端梯度增强树构建放射组学模型、剂量组学模型和杂交模型。计算灵敏度、特异度和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来评价模型的分类性能。最后,利用SHAP值对最佳模型进行可解释性分析,增强模型的透明度和实用性。结果:放射组学模型的敏感性、特异性和AUC分别为0.42、0.86和0.78,剂量组学模型的敏感性、特异性和AUC分别为0.50、0.90和0.74。相比之下,混合模型的灵敏度、特异度和AUC值分别为0.50、0.83和0.83,具有较好的分类性能。与单独的放射组学和剂量组学模型相比,混合模型显示出增强的分类能力。基于SHAP值的可解释性分析不仅提供了特征重要性排序和特征对模型输出影响的分布,而且阐明了受这些特征影响的具体决策过程以及它们之间的相互作用。这使临床医生能够更直观地理解模型的决策。结论:对于接受放化疗的晚期宫颈癌患者,放射组学和剂量组学特征的结合可以显著提高预测模型的分类性能,从而在细化患者治疗策略方面具有相当大的潜力。基于SHAP值的可解释性分析可以帮助临床医生更容易地理解模型的决策,从而促进模型在临床实践中的有效实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信