Computational toxicology in drug discovery: applications of artificial intelligence in ADMET and toxicity prediction.

IF 7.7 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Jiangyan Zhang, Haolin Li, Yuncong Zhang, Junyang Huang, Liping Ren, Chuantao Zhang, Quan Zou, Yang Zhang
{"title":"Computational toxicology in drug discovery: applications of artificial intelligence in ADMET and toxicity prediction.","authors":"Jiangyan Zhang, Haolin Li, Yuncong Zhang, Junyang Huang, Liping Ren, Chuantao Zhang, Quan Zou, Yang Zhang","doi":"10.1093/bib/bbaf533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Toxicity risk assessment plays a crucial role in determining the clinical success and market potential of drug candidates. Traditional animal-based testing is costly, time-consuming, and ethically controversial, which has led to the rapid development of computational toxicology. This review surveys over 20 ADMET prediction platforms, categorizing them into rule/statistical-based methods, machine learning (ML) methods, and graph-based methods. We also summarize major toxicological databases into four types: chemical toxicity, environmental toxicology, alternative toxicology, and biological toxin databases, highlighting their roles in model training and validation. Furthermore, we review recent advancements in ML and artificial intelligence (AI) applied to toxicity prediction, covering acute toxicity, organ-specific toxicities, and carcinogenicity. The field is transitioning from single-endpoint predictions to multi-endpoint joint modeling, incorporating multimodal features. We also explore the application of generative modeling techniques and interpretability frameworks to improve the accuracy and credibility of predictions. Additionally, we discuss the use of network toxicology in evaluating the safety of traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) and the potential of large language models (LLMs) in literature mining, knowledge integration, and molecular toxicity prediction. Finally, we address current challenges, including data quality, model interpretability, and causal inference, and propose future directions such as multi-omics integration, interpretable AI models, and domain-specific LLMs, aiming to provide more efficient and precise technical support for preclinical toxicity assessments in drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":9209,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in bioinformatics","volume":"26 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaf533","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Toxicity risk assessment plays a crucial role in determining the clinical success and market potential of drug candidates. Traditional animal-based testing is costly, time-consuming, and ethically controversial, which has led to the rapid development of computational toxicology. This review surveys over 20 ADMET prediction platforms, categorizing them into rule/statistical-based methods, machine learning (ML) methods, and graph-based methods. We also summarize major toxicological databases into four types: chemical toxicity, environmental toxicology, alternative toxicology, and biological toxin databases, highlighting their roles in model training and validation. Furthermore, we review recent advancements in ML and artificial intelligence (AI) applied to toxicity prediction, covering acute toxicity, organ-specific toxicities, and carcinogenicity. The field is transitioning from single-endpoint predictions to multi-endpoint joint modeling, incorporating multimodal features. We also explore the application of generative modeling techniques and interpretability frameworks to improve the accuracy and credibility of predictions. Additionally, we discuss the use of network toxicology in evaluating the safety of traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) and the potential of large language models (LLMs) in literature mining, knowledge integration, and molecular toxicity prediction. Finally, we address current challenges, including data quality, model interpretability, and causal inference, and propose future directions such as multi-omics integration, interpretable AI models, and domain-specific LLMs, aiming to provide more efficient and precise technical support for preclinical toxicity assessments in drug development.

药物发现中的计算毒理学:人工智能在ADMET和毒性预测中的应用。
毒性风险评估在决定候选药物的临床成功和市场潜力方面起着至关重要的作用。传统的动物实验成本高、耗时长,而且在伦理上存在争议,这导致了计算毒理学的快速发展。本文调查了20多个ADMET预测平台,将它们分为基于规则/统计的方法、机器学习(ML)方法和基于图的方法。我们还将主要的毒理学数据库归纳为四种类型:化学毒理学、环境毒理学、替代毒理学和生物毒素数据库,并强调了它们在模型训练和验证中的作用。此外,我们回顾了ML和人工智能(AI)在毒性预测方面的最新进展,包括急性毒性、器官特异性毒性和致癌性。该领域正在从单端点预测向多端点联合建模过渡,并结合了多模态特征。我们还探讨了生成建模技术和可解释性框架的应用,以提高预测的准确性和可信度。此外,我们还讨论了网络毒理学在评估中药安全性中的应用,以及大语言模型在文献挖掘、知识整合和分子毒性预测方面的潜力。最后,我们解决了当前的挑战,包括数据质量,模型可解释性和因果推理,并提出了未来的方向,如多组学集成,可解释的人工智能模型和特定领域的法学硕士,旨在为药物开发中的临床前毒性评估提供更有效和精确的技术支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Briefings in bioinformatics
Briefings in bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
13.70%
发文量
549
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Briefings in Bioinformatics is an international journal serving as a platform for researchers and educators in the life sciences. It also appeals to mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists applying their expertise to biological challenges. The journal focuses on reviews tailored for users of databases and analytical tools in contemporary genetics, molecular and systems biology. It stands out by offering practical assistance and guidance to non-specialists in computerized methodologies. Covering a wide range from introductory concepts to specific protocols and analyses, the papers address bacterial, plant, fungal, animal, and human data. The journal's detailed subject areas include genetic studies of phenotypes and genotypes, mapping, DNA sequencing, expression profiling, gene expression studies, microarrays, alignment methods, protein profiles and HMMs, lipids, metabolic and signaling pathways, structure determination and function prediction, phylogenetic studies, and education and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信