Sex differences in dementia risk: considering underlying medical conditions.

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anat Rotstein, Arad Kodesh, Michal Schnaider Beeri, Stephen Z Levine
{"title":"Sex differences in dementia risk: considering underlying medical conditions.","authors":"Anat Rotstein, Arad Kodesh, Michal Schnaider Beeri, Stephen Z Levine","doi":"10.1186/s13195-025-01843-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Underlying medical conditions may explain inconsistent reports of the association between sex and dementia risk. The current study aimed to explore the association between sex and the risk of incident dementia, considering a broad range of medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective national birth cohort study consisted of 53,224 members of a nonprofit health maintenance organization. Participants were born between 1922 and 1946 and entered the cohort on January 1, 2002, aged 55 to 80, without a dementia diagnosis. The cohort was followed up for 18 years to January 1, 2020. Dementia was ascertained based on medical diagnoses. Cox regression models were fitted to quantify the association between sex and the risk of incident dementia with hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI), unadjusted and, in the primary model, adjusted for background demographic factors and 33 medical conditions, classified as ten medical domains. Complementary analyses examined adjustment for each medical domain, and sensitivity analyses provided sex-specific estimates for each demographic or medical domain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic cohort of 53,224 participants had a mean (SD) age at cohort entry of 64.3 (7.08) years (Males: N = 24,489; 46.01%; M=63.47 (6.39); Females: N = 28,735; 53.99%; M=64.35 (6.78)). During follow-up, 8,373 participants (15.73%) were diagnosed with dementia (Females: 17.36%; N = 4,987; Males: 13.83%; N = 3,386). Sex differences in the risk of dementia were null after adjustment for demographic factors and medical conditions (unadjusted HR = 1.08 [95% CI = 1.03-1.13, P = 0.001]; adjusted HR = 1.02 [95% CI, 0.97-1.08; p = 0.38]). Complementary analyses showed that when accounting for some conditions (i.e., circulatory, respiratory, metabolic, digestive, or nervous system diseases; cancer; and injuries), females were at an elevated dementia risk compared to males. However, after accounting for rheumatic and genitourinary diseases, the association between sex and dementia was attenuated to null, and when accounting for psychiatric disorders, males were at greater risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this prospective birth cohort, the association between sex and the risk of incident dementia changed when background medical conditions were considered, possibly explaining previous inconsistent reports. Future dementia risk and prevention studies may wish to adequately explore sex differences in medical history.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"219"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01843-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Underlying medical conditions may explain inconsistent reports of the association between sex and dementia risk. The current study aimed to explore the association between sex and the risk of incident dementia, considering a broad range of medical conditions.

Methods: This prospective national birth cohort study consisted of 53,224 members of a nonprofit health maintenance organization. Participants were born between 1922 and 1946 and entered the cohort on January 1, 2002, aged 55 to 80, without a dementia diagnosis. The cohort was followed up for 18 years to January 1, 2020. Dementia was ascertained based on medical diagnoses. Cox regression models were fitted to quantify the association between sex and the risk of incident dementia with hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI), unadjusted and, in the primary model, adjusted for background demographic factors and 33 medical conditions, classified as ten medical domains. Complementary analyses examined adjustment for each medical domain, and sensitivity analyses provided sex-specific estimates for each demographic or medical domain.

Results: The analytic cohort of 53,224 participants had a mean (SD) age at cohort entry of 64.3 (7.08) years (Males: N = 24,489; 46.01%; M=63.47 (6.39); Females: N = 28,735; 53.99%; M=64.35 (6.78)). During follow-up, 8,373 participants (15.73%) were diagnosed with dementia (Females: 17.36%; N = 4,987; Males: 13.83%; N = 3,386). Sex differences in the risk of dementia were null after adjustment for demographic factors and medical conditions (unadjusted HR = 1.08 [95% CI = 1.03-1.13, P = 0.001]; adjusted HR = 1.02 [95% CI, 0.97-1.08; p = 0.38]). Complementary analyses showed that when accounting for some conditions (i.e., circulatory, respiratory, metabolic, digestive, or nervous system diseases; cancer; and injuries), females were at an elevated dementia risk compared to males. However, after accounting for rheumatic and genitourinary diseases, the association between sex and dementia was attenuated to null, and when accounting for psychiatric disorders, males were at greater risk.

Conclusions: In this prospective birth cohort, the association between sex and the risk of incident dementia changed when background medical conditions were considered, possibly explaining previous inconsistent reports. Future dementia risk and prevention studies may wish to adequately explore sex differences in medical history.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

痴呆风险的性别差异:考虑潜在的医疗条件。
背景:潜在的医学条件可以解释性别与痴呆风险之间不一致的关联报告。目前的研究旨在探索性别与痴呆风险之间的关系,考虑到广泛的医疗条件。方法:这项前瞻性国家出生队列研究包括53,224名非营利性健康维护组织的成员。参与者出生于1922年至1946年之间,于2002年1月1日进入队列,年龄在55岁至80岁之间,没有痴呆症诊断。该队列随访18年,至2020年1月1日。痴呆症是根据医学诊断确定的。采用Cox回归模型拟合,量化性别与痴呆发生率之间的关联,包括风险比(HR)及其95%置信区间(CI),未调整,在初级模型中,根据背景人口统计学因素和33种医学条件(分为10个医学领域)进行调整。补充分析检查了每个医学领域的调整,敏感性分析提供了每个人口统计学或医学领域的性别特异性估计。结果:53,224名参与者的分析队列入组时平均(SD)年龄为64.3(7.08)岁(男性:N = 24,489; 46.01%; M=63.47 (6.39);女性:N = 28,735;53.99%;M = 64.35(6.78))。在随访期间,8373名参与者(15.73%)被诊断为痴呆症(女性:17.36%;N = 4,987;男性:13.83%;N = 3,386)。在调整人口统计学因素和医疗条件后,痴呆风险的性别差异为零(未调整的HR = 1.08 [95% CI = 1.03-1.13, P = 0.001];调整的HR = 1.02 [95% CI, 0.97-1.08; P = 0.38])。补充分析表明,当考虑到某些情况(即循环、呼吸、代谢、消化或神经系统疾病;癌症和损伤)时,与男性相比,女性患痴呆症的风险更高。然而,在考虑了风湿病和泌尿生殖系统疾病后,性别与痴呆之间的关联减弱为零,而在考虑精神疾病时,男性的风险更大。结论:在这个前瞻性出生队列中,当考虑到背景医疗条件时,性别与痴呆发生风险之间的关系发生了变化,这可能解释了之前不一致的报告。未来的痴呆风险和预防研究可能希望充分探索病史中的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信