Kherlen Jigjid, Ali Eidi, Nguyen Anh Khoa Doan, Richard P. Dwight
{"title":"Discovery of a Physically Interpretable Data-Driven Wind-Turbine Wake Model","authors":"Kherlen Jigjid, Ali Eidi, Nguyen Anh Khoa Doan, Richard P. Dwight","doi":"10.1007/s10494-025-00679-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a compact data-driven Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) model for wind turbine wake prediction, built as an enhancement of the standard <span>\\(k\\)</span>-<span>\\(\\varepsilon\\)</span> formulation. Several candidate models were discovered using the symbolic regression framework Sparse Regression of Turbulent Stress Anisotropy (SpaRTA), trained on a single Large Eddy Simulation (LES) dataset of a standalone wind turbine. The leading model was selected by prioritizing simplicity while maintaining reasonable accuracy, resulting in a novel linear eddy viscosity model. This selected leading model reduces eddy viscosity in high-shear regions—particularly in the wake—to limit turbulence mixing and delay wake recovery. This addresses a common shortcoming of the standard <span>\\(k\\)</span>-<span>\\(\\varepsilon\\)</span> model, which tends to overpredict mixing, leading to unrealistically fast wake recovery. Moreover, the formulation of the leading model closely resembles that of the established <span>\\(k\\)</span>-<span>\\(\\varepsilon\\)</span>-<span>\\(f_P\\)</span> model. Consistent with this resemblance, the leading and <span>\\(k\\)</span>-<span>\\(\\varepsilon\\)</span>-<span>\\(f_P\\)</span> models show nearly identical performance in predicting velocity fields and power output, but they differ in their predictions of turbulent kinetic energy. In addition, the generalization capability of the leading model was assessed using three unseen six-turbine configurations with varying spacing and alignment. Despite being trained solely on a standalone turbine case, the model produced results comparable to LES data. These findings demonstrate that data-driven methods can yield interpretable, physically consistent RANS models that are competitive with traditional modeling approaches while maintaining simplicity and achieving generalizability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":559,"journal":{"name":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","volume":"115 :","pages":"1181 - 1207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10494-025-00679-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-025-00679-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents a compact data-driven Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) model for wind turbine wake prediction, built as an enhancement of the standard \(k\)-\(\varepsilon\) formulation. Several candidate models were discovered using the symbolic regression framework Sparse Regression of Turbulent Stress Anisotropy (SpaRTA), trained on a single Large Eddy Simulation (LES) dataset of a standalone wind turbine. The leading model was selected by prioritizing simplicity while maintaining reasonable accuracy, resulting in a novel linear eddy viscosity model. This selected leading model reduces eddy viscosity in high-shear regions—particularly in the wake—to limit turbulence mixing and delay wake recovery. This addresses a common shortcoming of the standard \(k\)-\(\varepsilon\) model, which tends to overpredict mixing, leading to unrealistically fast wake recovery. Moreover, the formulation of the leading model closely resembles that of the established \(k\)-\(\varepsilon\)-\(f_P\) model. Consistent with this resemblance, the leading and \(k\)-\(\varepsilon\)-\(f_P\) models show nearly identical performance in predicting velocity fields and power output, but they differ in their predictions of turbulent kinetic energy. In addition, the generalization capability of the leading model was assessed using three unseen six-turbine configurations with varying spacing and alignment. Despite being trained solely on a standalone turbine case, the model produced results comparable to LES data. These findings demonstrate that data-driven methods can yield interpretable, physically consistent RANS models that are competitive with traditional modeling approaches while maintaining simplicity and achieving generalizability.
期刊介绍:
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion provides a global forum for the publication of original and innovative research results that contribute to the solution of fundamental and applied problems encountered in single-phase, multi-phase and reacting flows, in both idealized and real systems. The scope of coverage encompasses topics in fluid dynamics, scalar transport, multi-physics interactions and flow control. From time to time the journal publishes Special or Theme Issues featuring invited articles.
Contributions may report research that falls within the broad spectrum of analytical, computational and experimental methods. This includes research conducted in academia, industry and a variety of environmental and geophysical sectors. Turbulence, transition and associated phenomena are expected to play a significant role in the majority of studies reported, although non-turbulent flows, typical of those in micro-devices, would be regarded as falling within the scope covered. The emphasis is on originality, timeliness, quality and thematic fit, as exemplified by the title of the journal and the qualifications described above. Relevance to real-world problems and industrial applications are regarded as strengths.