Current experiences in the design and construction of pressure tunnels and shafts

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Dipl. Ing. Sebastian Pausz, Dr. Dipl. Ing. Miroslav Marence, Dipl. Ing. Armin Nocker B.Sc., Dr. Dipl. Ing. Mathias Smesnik, Dipl. Ing. Zoran Radic
{"title":"Current experiences in the design and construction of pressure tunnels and shafts","authors":"Dipl. Ing. Sebastian Pausz,&nbsp;Dr. Dipl. Ing. Miroslav Marence,&nbsp;Dipl. Ing. Armin Nocker B.Sc.,&nbsp;Dr. Dipl. Ing. Mathias Smesnik,&nbsp;Dipl. Ing. Zoran Radic","doi":"10.1002/geot.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hydrotechnical power waterways in the form of pressurized tunnels and shafts pose geotechnical requirements on the surrounding underground, which vary significantly from those of other infrastructure tunnels, like traffic or mining tunnels. The excavation process and the primary support design requirements of traffic and hydrotechnical tunnels are the same. Nevertheless, the structural design aspects of the final (inner) lining of these two tunnel types are different and misunderstanding of these differences is often the reason for problems occurring in operation. Although the technical issues related to the subject were correctly identified and solved decades ago, it appears that some of the basic technical aspects are not addressed correctly in the design and execution of some hydrotechnical tunnels today. This fact was the main motivation of the authors to summarize current experiences of design and construction in hydropower projects worldwide. The primary focus is placed on the technical requirements for the final hydraulic lining of tunnels and shafts. For unlined and shotcrete lined tunnels, the design is mostly performed by classification systems. The limitations and risks of this approach are explained. For concrete lined and steel lined tunnels and shafts, current experiences and preconditions for the state-of-the-art design approaches are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":39412,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanik und Tunnelbau","volume":"18 5","pages":"490-497"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanik und Tunnelbau","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/geot.70026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrotechnical power waterways in the form of pressurized tunnels and shafts pose geotechnical requirements on the surrounding underground, which vary significantly from those of other infrastructure tunnels, like traffic or mining tunnels. The excavation process and the primary support design requirements of traffic and hydrotechnical tunnels are the same. Nevertheless, the structural design aspects of the final (inner) lining of these two tunnel types are different and misunderstanding of these differences is often the reason for problems occurring in operation. Although the technical issues related to the subject were correctly identified and solved decades ago, it appears that some of the basic technical aspects are not addressed correctly in the design and execution of some hydrotechnical tunnels today. This fact was the main motivation of the authors to summarize current experiences of design and construction in hydropower projects worldwide. The primary focus is placed on the technical requirements for the final hydraulic lining of tunnels and shafts. For unlined and shotcrete lined tunnels, the design is mostly performed by classification systems. The limitations and risks of this approach are explained. For concrete lined and steel lined tunnels and shafts, current experiences and preconditions for the state-of-the-art design approaches are discussed.

Abstract Image

目前在压力隧道和竖井的设计和施工经验
高压隧道和竖井形式的水力发电水道对周围的地下提出了岩土工程要求,这与其他基础设施隧道(如交通或采矿隧道)的要求有很大不同。交通隧道和水工隧道的开挖过程和主要支护设计要求是相同的。然而,这两种隧道类型的末(内)衬砌的结构设计方面是不同的,对这些差异的误解往往是运行中出现问题的原因。虽然与该主题有关的技术问题在几十年前就得到了正确的识别和解决,但在今天一些水工隧道的设计和施工中,似乎没有正确地解决一些基本的技术问题。这一事实是作者总结当前世界水电工程设计与施工经验的主要动机。主要重点放在隧道和竖井的最终水力衬砌的技术要求上。对于无衬砌和喷射混凝土衬砌隧道,设计大多采用分级系统。解释了这种方法的局限性和风险。对于混凝土衬砌和钢衬砌的隧道和竖井,讨论了目前的经验和最先进的设计方法的前提条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geomechanik und Tunnelbau
Geomechanik und Tunnelbau Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: The contributions published in Geomechanics and Tunnelling deal with practical aspects of applied engineering geology, rock mechanics and rock engineering, soil mechanics and foundation engineering, and primarily tunnelling. Each issue focuses on a current topic or specific project. Brief news, reports from construction sites and news on conferences round off the content. From the start of 2009 Geomechanics and Tunnelling has been published as a bilingual English/German journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信