Harsh Jain MBBS , Advith Sarikonda BA, BS , Omar Zakieh MBBS , Sakshi Krishna BS , Alexander Lyons BS , Sameer Sundrani BS , Tag Alsir Osama BS , Austin Montgomery BS , Walter Navid BS , Iyan Younus MD , Ranbir Ahluwalia MD , Tyler Zeoli MD , Soren Jonzzon MD , Hani Chanbour MD , Julian Lugo-Pico MD , Amir M Abtahi MD , Byron F Stephens MD , Scott L. Zuckerman MDMPH
{"title":"18. Cell Saver in adult spinal deformity surgery: helping or hurting?","authors":"Harsh Jain MBBS , Advith Sarikonda BA, BS , Omar Zakieh MBBS , Sakshi Krishna BS , Alexander Lyons BS , Sameer Sundrani BS , Tag Alsir Osama BS , Austin Montgomery BS , Walter Navid BS , Iyan Younus MD , Ranbir Ahluwalia MD , Tyler Zeoli MD , Soren Jonzzon MD , Hani Chanbour MD , Julian Lugo-Pico MD , Amir M Abtahi MD , Byron F Stephens MD , Scott L. Zuckerman MDMPH","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.08.200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3><div>While Cell Saver (CS) is meant to give patients back their own blood products, the quality of said blood products has been called into question.</div></div><div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>In patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, we evaluated the impact CS on:1) intraoperative transfusions, 2) postoperative hematocrit, and 3) complications.</div></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study</div></div><div><h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2009-23. Inclusion criteria were: ≥5-level fusion, sagittal/coronal deformity, and ≥2-year follow-up. The primary exposure was use of CS.</div></div><div><h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3><div>Primary outcomes were: 1) intraoperative transfusions, 2) postoperative hematocrit, and 3) overall complications. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative hypotension, defined as total minutes mean arterial pressure (MAP) was <65mmHg, length of stay (LOS), and discharge status.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2009-23. Inclusion criteria were: ≥5-level fusion, sagittal/coronal deformity, and ≥2-year follow-up. The primary exposure was use of CS. Primary outcomes were: 1) intraoperative transfusions, 2) postoperative hematocrit, and 3) overall complications. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative hypotension, defined as total minutes mean arterial pressure (MAP) was <65mmHg, length of stay (LOS), and discharge status. Bivariate and multivariable analysis controlling for age, sex, body mass index and operative time were performed.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Of 288 patients undergoing ASD surgery with a mean age of 63±18 years, 209 (73%) used CS. Mean CS given back was 428±404 ml. CS use was associated with a longer operative time (442±149 vs 382±150 minutes, p=0.003) and higher blood loss (1490 vs 765 ml, p<0.001).The CS group paradoxically had higher intraoperative transfusion rates (68% vs 32%, p<0.001) and blood product usage (3±4 vs 1±2 units, p<0.001). Postoperative hematocrit was not different between groups (30±4 vs 30±5, p=0.936). On multivariable regression, CS was independently associated with increased transfusions (OR=2.94, 95%CI: 1.56-5.53, p<0.01) and medical complications (OR=2.72, 95%CI:1.01-7.00, p=0.038). Regarding secondary outcomes, multivariable regression analysis showed that Cell Saver was associated with longer intraoperative hypotension (β=16.8, 95%CI:3.8-29.7, p=0.011) and higher odds of having MAP<65mmHg for ≥90 minutes (OR=3.3, 95%CI:1.1-9.7, p=0.032).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>While controlling for operative time, Cell Saver use in ASD surgery was independently associated with increased intraoperative transfusions, medical complications, and prolonged hypotension without an improvement in postoperative hematocrit levels. Though giving patients back their own blood products appears beneficial, these data question the safety of Cell Saver in ASD surgery.</div></div><div><h3>FDA Device/Drug Status</h3><div>Cell Saver (Approved for this indication).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":"25 11","pages":"Pages S10-S11"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1529943025005807","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT
While Cell Saver (CS) is meant to give patients back their own blood products, the quality of said blood products has been called into question.
PURPOSE
In patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, we evaluated the impact CS on:1) intraoperative transfusions, 2) postoperative hematocrit, and 3) complications.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING
Retrospective cohort study
PATIENT SAMPLE
A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2009-23. Inclusion criteria were: ≥5-level fusion, sagittal/coronal deformity, and ≥2-year follow-up. The primary exposure was use of CS.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Primary outcomes were: 1) intraoperative transfusions, 2) postoperative hematocrit, and 3) overall complications. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative hypotension, defined as total minutes mean arterial pressure (MAP) was <65mmHg, length of stay (LOS), and discharge status.
METHODS
A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2009-23. Inclusion criteria were: ≥5-level fusion, sagittal/coronal deformity, and ≥2-year follow-up. The primary exposure was use of CS. Primary outcomes were: 1) intraoperative transfusions, 2) postoperative hematocrit, and 3) overall complications. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative hypotension, defined as total minutes mean arterial pressure (MAP) was <65mmHg, length of stay (LOS), and discharge status. Bivariate and multivariable analysis controlling for age, sex, body mass index and operative time were performed.
RESULTS
Of 288 patients undergoing ASD surgery with a mean age of 63±18 years, 209 (73%) used CS. Mean CS given back was 428±404 ml. CS use was associated with a longer operative time (442±149 vs 382±150 minutes, p=0.003) and higher blood loss (1490 vs 765 ml, p<0.001).The CS group paradoxically had higher intraoperative transfusion rates (68% vs 32%, p<0.001) and blood product usage (3±4 vs 1±2 units, p<0.001). Postoperative hematocrit was not different between groups (30±4 vs 30±5, p=0.936). On multivariable regression, CS was independently associated with increased transfusions (OR=2.94, 95%CI: 1.56-5.53, p<0.01) and medical complications (OR=2.72, 95%CI:1.01-7.00, p=0.038). Regarding secondary outcomes, multivariable regression analysis showed that Cell Saver was associated with longer intraoperative hypotension (β=16.8, 95%CI:3.8-29.7, p=0.011) and higher odds of having MAP<65mmHg for ≥90 minutes (OR=3.3, 95%CI:1.1-9.7, p=0.032).
CONCLUSIONS
While controlling for operative time, Cell Saver use in ASD surgery was independently associated with increased intraoperative transfusions, medical complications, and prolonged hypotension without an improvement in postoperative hematocrit levels. Though giving patients back their own blood products appears beneficial, these data question the safety of Cell Saver in ASD surgery.
期刊介绍:
The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.