Does policy-oriented environmental disclosure increase market uncertainty? Evidence from stock price volatility in China

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Cheng Liu , Siyuan Dong , Xinyi Gao
{"title":"Does policy-oriented environmental disclosure increase market uncertainty? Evidence from stock price volatility in China","authors":"Cheng Liu ,&nbsp;Siyuan Dong ,&nbsp;Xinyi Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using textual analysis on Chinese listed firms from 2015 to 2022, this study investigates how policy-oriented environmental disclosures affect stock price volatility. Drawing on institutional and stakeholder theories, we find that such disclosure increases market uncertainty by signaling symbolic regulatory compliance rather than value-relevant performance, thereby weakening investor confidence. This effect is amplified under stronger regulative and normative pressures, while cognitive pressure shows no significant impact. Further analysis indicates that policy-oriented environmental disclosures help companies enhance regulatory legitimacy and obtain environmental subsidies, thereby mitigating and offsetting the negative impact of stock price volatility. Additionally, companies can strategically manage conflicting demands among stakeholders by adjusting the form and content of environmental disclosures. Heterogeneity tests show that policy-oriented environmental disclosures lead to more significant stock price volatility in high-tech companies, non-state-owned enterprises, pollution-intensive industries, and companies with a history of environmental violations. Our findings highlight the complex trade-offs firms navigate in environmental reporting and the dual influence of competing institutional pressures in shaping both the form quality and content quality of firm environmental disclosure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 103152"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925004088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using textual analysis on Chinese listed firms from 2015 to 2022, this study investigates how policy-oriented environmental disclosures affect stock price volatility. Drawing on institutional and stakeholder theories, we find that such disclosure increases market uncertainty by signaling symbolic regulatory compliance rather than value-relevant performance, thereby weakening investor confidence. This effect is amplified under stronger regulative and normative pressures, while cognitive pressure shows no significant impact. Further analysis indicates that policy-oriented environmental disclosures help companies enhance regulatory legitimacy and obtain environmental subsidies, thereby mitigating and offsetting the negative impact of stock price volatility. Additionally, companies can strategically manage conflicting demands among stakeholders by adjusting the form and content of environmental disclosures. Heterogeneity tests show that policy-oriented environmental disclosures lead to more significant stock price volatility in high-tech companies, non-state-owned enterprises, pollution-intensive industries, and companies with a history of environmental violations. Our findings highlight the complex trade-offs firms navigate in environmental reporting and the dual influence of competing institutional pressures in shaping both the form quality and content quality of firm environmental disclosure.
政策导向的环境信息披露是否增加了市场的不确定性?来自中国股价波动的证据
本文以2015 - 2022年中国上市公司为样本,考察了政策导向的环境信息披露对股价波动的影响。利用制度和利益相关者理论,我们发现这种披露增加了市场的不确定性,因为它表明象征性的监管合规,而不是价值相关的业绩,从而削弱了投资者的信心。在更强的调节和规范压力下,这种效应被放大,而认知压力没有明显的影响。进一步分析表明,政策导向的环境披露有助于企业提高监管合法性,获得环境补贴,从而缓解和抵消股价波动的负面影响。此外,公司可以通过调整环境披露的形式和内容,战略性地管理利益相关者之间的冲突要求。异质性检验表明,政策导向的环境信息披露导致高科技公司、非国有企业、污染密集型行业和有环境违法历史的公司的股价波动更显著。我们的研究结果强调了企业在环境报告中进行的复杂权衡,以及在塑造企业环境披露的形式质量和内容质量方面,竞争制度压力的双重影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.20%
发文量
240
期刊介绍: Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信