{"title":"Stochastic, multi-path vulnerability assessment of a physical protection system using non-fixed critical detection points","authors":"Melih Ozkutuk , Sunil S. Chirayath","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Physical protection system (PPS) at nuclear facilities must be assessed against diverse adversary strategies, uncertainties in detection performance, and potential insider actions. Traditional estimate of adversary sequence interruption (EASI) model assumes fixed critical detection points (CDPs) and fail to capture detection variability or multi-path vulnerabilities. This paper introduces a stochastic, multi-path framework with non-fixed CDPs (nf-CDPs) that accounts for uncertainty in detection probability, communication reliability, and response delays. A stochastic approach (100,000 simulations) is applied to adversary path generation under five adversary strategies: random, rushing, covert, deep penetration, and most vulnerable path (MVP). The framework incorporates simplified insider modeling and cost–performance analysis. Results show nf-CDPs shift dynamically with stochastic sampling, producing wider probability of interruption (P<sub>I</sub>) distributions than fixed-point CDP assumptions. Sensitivity analysis highlights insider presence and response force variability, while regression confirms a nonlinear cost–P<sub>I</sub> relationship. The study demonstrates nf-CDPs provide a more realistic PPS assessment and practical recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 111914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925007315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Physical protection system (PPS) at nuclear facilities must be assessed against diverse adversary strategies, uncertainties in detection performance, and potential insider actions. Traditional estimate of adversary sequence interruption (EASI) model assumes fixed critical detection points (CDPs) and fail to capture detection variability or multi-path vulnerabilities. This paper introduces a stochastic, multi-path framework with non-fixed CDPs (nf-CDPs) that accounts for uncertainty in detection probability, communication reliability, and response delays. A stochastic approach (100,000 simulations) is applied to adversary path generation under five adversary strategies: random, rushing, covert, deep penetration, and most vulnerable path (MVP). The framework incorporates simplified insider modeling and cost–performance analysis. Results show nf-CDPs shift dynamically with stochastic sampling, producing wider probability of interruption (PI) distributions than fixed-point CDP assumptions. Sensitivity analysis highlights insider presence and response force variability, while regression confirms a nonlinear cost–PI relationship. The study demonstrates nf-CDPs provide a more realistic PPS assessment and practical recommendations.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.