Stochastic, multi-path vulnerability assessment of a physical protection system using non-fixed critical detection points

IF 2.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Melih Ozkutuk , Sunil S. Chirayath
{"title":"Stochastic, multi-path vulnerability assessment of a physical protection system using non-fixed critical detection points","authors":"Melih Ozkutuk ,&nbsp;Sunil S. Chirayath","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Physical protection system (PPS) at nuclear facilities must be assessed against diverse adversary strategies, uncertainties in detection performance, and potential insider actions. Traditional estimate of adversary sequence interruption (EASI) model assumes fixed critical detection points (CDPs) and fail to capture detection variability or multi-path vulnerabilities. This paper introduces a stochastic, multi-path framework with non-fixed CDPs (nf-CDPs) that accounts for uncertainty in detection probability, communication reliability, and response delays. A stochastic approach (100,000 simulations) is applied to adversary path generation under five adversary strategies: random, rushing, covert, deep penetration, and most vulnerable path (MVP). The framework incorporates simplified insider modeling and cost–performance analysis. Results show nf-CDPs shift dynamically with stochastic sampling, producing wider probability of interruption (P<sub>I</sub>) distributions than fixed-point CDP assumptions. Sensitivity analysis highlights insider presence and response force variability, while regression confirms a nonlinear cost–P<sub>I</sub> relationship. The study demonstrates nf-CDPs provide a more realistic PPS assessment and practical recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 111914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925007315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physical protection system (PPS) at nuclear facilities must be assessed against diverse adversary strategies, uncertainties in detection performance, and potential insider actions. Traditional estimate of adversary sequence interruption (EASI) model assumes fixed critical detection points (CDPs) and fail to capture detection variability or multi-path vulnerabilities. This paper introduces a stochastic, multi-path framework with non-fixed CDPs (nf-CDPs) that accounts for uncertainty in detection probability, communication reliability, and response delays. A stochastic approach (100,000 simulations) is applied to adversary path generation under five adversary strategies: random, rushing, covert, deep penetration, and most vulnerable path (MVP). The framework incorporates simplified insider modeling and cost–performance analysis. Results show nf-CDPs shift dynamically with stochastic sampling, producing wider probability of interruption (PI) distributions than fixed-point CDP assumptions. Sensitivity analysis highlights insider presence and response force variability, while regression confirms a nonlinear cost–PI relationship. The study demonstrates nf-CDPs provide a more realistic PPS assessment and practical recommendations.
基于非固定关键检测点的物理防护系统随机多路径脆弱性评估
必须对核设施的物理保护系统(PPS)进行评估,以应对各种对手的战略、探测性能的不确定性和潜在的内部行为。传统的攻击序列中断(EASI)模型假设了固定的关键检测点(cdp),无法捕捉到检测的可变性或多路径漏洞。本文介绍了一种具有非固定cdp (nf- cdp)的随机多路径框架,该框架考虑了检测概率、通信可靠性和响应延迟的不确定性。随机方法(100,000次模拟)应用于五种对手策略下的对手路径生成:随机,匆忙,隐蔽,深度渗透和最脆弱路径(MVP)。该框架结合了简化的内部建模和成本-性能分析。结果表明,非定点CDP随随机抽样动态变化,产生比定点CDP假设更大的中断概率(PI)分布。敏感性分析强调内部存在和响应力可变性,而回归证实了非线性成本- pi关系。研究表明,非cdp提供了更现实的PPS评估和实用的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Annals of Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
21.10%
发文量
632
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信