Analytical Solution for Seepage Fields Around Drained Diversion Tunnels Considering Arbitrary Ground Leakages

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
An Jiang, Zheng Hu, Zhong Xuan Yang
{"title":"Analytical Solution for Seepage Fields Around Drained Diversion Tunnels Considering Arbitrary Ground Leakages","authors":"An Jiang, Zheng Hu, Zhong Xuan Yang","doi":"10.1002/nag.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High‐diversion tunnels are often designed as drained systems to mitigate pressure differences between the tunnel interior and surrounding soil, commonly resulting in elevated hydraulic pressure and seepage infiltration toward the ground surface, posing risks to structural integrity and surface stability. This study presents a novel analytical solution for the seepage field around drained diversion tunnels considering arbitrary ground leakages. The solution integrates conformal transformation, the method of separation of variables, and trigonometric orthogonality, and demonstrates applicability for both deep and shallow‐buried diversion tunnels. Parametric analyses reveal that both the total water outflux and the flow velocity outside the tunnel are highly sensitive to the total head difference, tunnel radius, burial depth, and spatial distribution of ground leakage regions (e.g., leakage length, interval, and proximity to the tunnel vault). Notably, hydraulic pressure between adjacent ground leakage regions and flow velocity across the leakage regions increase with a lower ratio of burial depth to tunnel radius, fewer leakage regions, shorter leakage lengths, and larger head difference. The maximum water outflux consistently localizes in the central leakage region with magnitude fluctuations governed by the parity of the total leakage regions. The proposed analytical framework is further extended to address irregular cross‐sectional tunnel shapes via a gradient descent method and can be flexibly adapted to various boundary conditions. This work provides a computationally efficient tool for optimizing drainage designs and assessing leakage‐induced risks in diversion tunnel projects.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"158 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70097","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High‐diversion tunnels are often designed as drained systems to mitigate pressure differences between the tunnel interior and surrounding soil, commonly resulting in elevated hydraulic pressure and seepage infiltration toward the ground surface, posing risks to structural integrity and surface stability. This study presents a novel analytical solution for the seepage field around drained diversion tunnels considering arbitrary ground leakages. The solution integrates conformal transformation, the method of separation of variables, and trigonometric orthogonality, and demonstrates applicability for both deep and shallow‐buried diversion tunnels. Parametric analyses reveal that both the total water outflux and the flow velocity outside the tunnel are highly sensitive to the total head difference, tunnel radius, burial depth, and spatial distribution of ground leakage regions (e.g., leakage length, interval, and proximity to the tunnel vault). Notably, hydraulic pressure between adjacent ground leakage regions and flow velocity across the leakage regions increase with a lower ratio of burial depth to tunnel radius, fewer leakage regions, shorter leakage lengths, and larger head difference. The maximum water outflux consistently localizes in the central leakage region with magnitude fluctuations governed by the parity of the total leakage regions. The proposed analytical framework is further extended to address irregular cross‐sectional tunnel shapes via a gradient descent method and can be flexibly adapted to various boundary conditions. This work provides a computationally efficient tool for optimizing drainage designs and assessing leakage‐induced risks in diversion tunnel projects.
考虑任意地面渗漏的排水导流隧洞周边渗流场解析解
高导流隧道通常被设计为排水系统,以减轻隧道内部和周围土壤之间的压力差,通常导致水压升高和渗水渗入地表,对结构完整性和地表稳定性构成风险。本文提出了一种新的考虑任意地表渗漏的导流隧洞周边渗流场解析解。该解综合了保角变换、分离变量法和三角正交法,适用于深埋和浅埋导流洞。参数分析表明,总出水量和隧道外流速对总水头差、隧道半径、埋深和地下渗漏区域的空间分布(如渗漏长度、间隔和与隧道拱顶的接近程度)高度敏感。值得注意的是,随着埋深与隧道半径之比的减小、泄漏区域的减少、泄漏长度的缩短和水头差的增大,相邻地下泄漏区域之间的水力压力和穿越泄漏区域的流速增大。最大出水流量始终位于中心泄漏区,其大小波动受总泄漏区宇称的支配。所提出的分析框架进一步扩展到通过梯度下降法来解决不规则横截面隧道形状,并且可以灵活地适应各种边界条件。本研究为优化引水隧洞工程的排水设计和评估渗漏风险提供了一个有效的计算工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信