Jonathan B Wallach, Sheetal Malhotra, Steve P Lee, Lori Hoffman-Hogg, Ronald Shapiro, Gabriela Wechsler, Katherine Faricy-Anderson, Mary C McGunigal, Maria D Kelly, Ruchika Gutt
{"title":"Radiation and Medical Oncology Perspectives on Oligometastatic Disease Treatment.","authors":"Jonathan B Wallach, Sheetal Malhotra, Steve P Lee, Lori Hoffman-Hogg, Ronald Shapiro, Gabriela Wechsler, Katherine Faricy-Anderson, Mary C McGunigal, Maria D Kelly, Ruchika Gutt","doi":"10.12788/fp.0603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent phase 2 randomized clinical trials support the use of aggressive local treatment in addition to systemic therapy for oligometastatic disease (OMD) to improve progression-free survival and overall survival. These studies have mostly incorporated stereotactic body radiotherapy and serve as the foundation for multiple phase 3 trials aiming to determine how many metastases comprehensive local radiotherapy (RT) offer survival benefits, and for which cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To understand clinician views on the role of local RT for OMD, a 12-question survey was developed that included case examples. The survey was distributed to Veterans Health Administration (VHA) radiation oncologists and medical oncologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 106 survey respondents, 59 (55.7%) were radiation oncologists and 47 (44.3%) were medical oncologists. All respondents indicated high-dose RT has potential benefits for appropriately selected cases. Most oncologists (88.7%) responded that RT for OMD contributes to cure (88.1% radiation oncologists, 89.4% medical oncologists; <i>P</i> = .84). More than half (52.9%) of respondents (55.2% radiation oncologists, 50.0% medical oncologists; <i>P</i> = .60) indicated that local RT for OMD should not be limited by histology. Most radiation oncologists classified ≤ 5 lesions as OMD, whereas most medical oncologists classified ≤ 3 lesions as OMD (<i>P</i> = .006). Thirty-six medical oncologists (76.6%) has a radiation oncology department at their institution. This subgroup was more likely to consider local RT as potentially curative than peers without radiation oncology at their institution (94.4% vs 72.7%; <i>P</i> = .04). Management differences in the 3 oligometastatic cases were also identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study highlight ongoing support among VHA oncologists for local RT in the management of OMD and reveal specialty-based and access-based variability in treatment perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":94009,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"42 Suppl3","pages":"S3-S8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Recent phase 2 randomized clinical trials support the use of aggressive local treatment in addition to systemic therapy for oligometastatic disease (OMD) to improve progression-free survival and overall survival. These studies have mostly incorporated stereotactic body radiotherapy and serve as the foundation for multiple phase 3 trials aiming to determine how many metastases comprehensive local radiotherapy (RT) offer survival benefits, and for which cancers.
Methods: To understand clinician views on the role of local RT for OMD, a 12-question survey was developed that included case examples. The survey was distributed to Veterans Health Administration (VHA) radiation oncologists and medical oncologists.
Results: Of 106 survey respondents, 59 (55.7%) were radiation oncologists and 47 (44.3%) were medical oncologists. All respondents indicated high-dose RT has potential benefits for appropriately selected cases. Most oncologists (88.7%) responded that RT for OMD contributes to cure (88.1% radiation oncologists, 89.4% medical oncologists; P = .84). More than half (52.9%) of respondents (55.2% radiation oncologists, 50.0% medical oncologists; P = .60) indicated that local RT for OMD should not be limited by histology. Most radiation oncologists classified ≤ 5 lesions as OMD, whereas most medical oncologists classified ≤ 3 lesions as OMD (P = .006). Thirty-six medical oncologists (76.6%) has a radiation oncology department at their institution. This subgroup was more likely to consider local RT as potentially curative than peers without radiation oncology at their institution (94.4% vs 72.7%; P = .04). Management differences in the 3 oligometastatic cases were also identified.
Conclusions: The results of this study highlight ongoing support among VHA oncologists for local RT in the management of OMD and reveal specialty-based and access-based variability in treatment perspectives.