Proactive Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: Lessons Learned From a Quality Improvement Project.

Maj Sarah McDonald, Derek Smith
{"title":"Proactive Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: Lessons Learned From a Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Maj Sarah McDonald, Derek Smith","doi":"10.12788/fp.0611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>About 9% of all patients have a health record indicating penicillin allergy, but only 10% of these patients are truly allergic on confirmatory testing. This high percentage of incorrect labeling creates a burden for the health care system and patients, making the removal of this diagnosis an important priority. Until recently, penicillin delabeling has been done primarily by allergists, but integration with primary care is needed.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>A program was developed that successfully trained primary care practitioners (PCPs) to use the PEN-FAST clinical criteria to identify low-risk patients and conduct an oral test for allergy. This model allows low-risk patients to undergo testing in a primary care office with resources available to treat any immunoglobulin E mediated severe reaction. Patients who test negative for a penicillin allergy can then be delabeled and receive more appropriate antibiotics during future infections. Skin testing was only used in 18% of the tested population and 94% of tested patients tolerated the antibiotic and their penicillin allergy history was delabeled.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this program most penicillin allergy labels were cleared based on clinical criteria and oral challenge alone, highlighting the potential benefits of PEN-FAST. Expansion of training should be offered to PCPs to conduct oral challenges in appropriate settings in an effort to reduce this significant burden on patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94009,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"42 8","pages":"308-313a"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: About 9% of all patients have a health record indicating penicillin allergy, but only 10% of these patients are truly allergic on confirmatory testing. This high percentage of incorrect labeling creates a burden for the health care system and patients, making the removal of this diagnosis an important priority. Until recently, penicillin delabeling has been done primarily by allergists, but integration with primary care is needed.

Observations: A program was developed that successfully trained primary care practitioners (PCPs) to use the PEN-FAST clinical criteria to identify low-risk patients and conduct an oral test for allergy. This model allows low-risk patients to undergo testing in a primary care office with resources available to treat any immunoglobulin E mediated severe reaction. Patients who test negative for a penicillin allergy can then be delabeled and receive more appropriate antibiotics during future infections. Skin testing was only used in 18% of the tested population and 94% of tested patients tolerated the antibiotic and their penicillin allergy history was delabeled.

Conclusions: In this program most penicillin allergy labels were cleared based on clinical criteria and oral challenge alone, highlighting the potential benefits of PEN-FAST. Expansion of training should be offered to PCPs to conduct oral challenges in appropriate settings in an effort to reduce this significant burden on patient care.

主动青霉素过敏去标签:从质量改进项目中吸取的教训。
背景:约9%的患者有青霉素过敏的健康记录,但这些患者中只有10%在确证试验中确实过敏。如此高比例的不正确标签给卫生保健系统和患者造成了负担,使消除这种诊断成为一项重要的优先事项。直到最近,青霉素去标签主要是由过敏症专家完成的,但需要与初级保健相结合。观察:开发了一个项目,成功地培训初级保健从业人员(pcp)使用PEN-FAST临床标准来识别低风险患者并进行口腔过敏测试。这种模式允许低风险患者在有资源的初级保健办公室接受检测,以治疗任何免疫球蛋白E介导的严重反应。对青霉素过敏检测呈阴性的患者可以取消标签,并在未来感染时接受更适当的抗生素治疗。皮肤试验仅在18%的测试人群中使用,94%的测试患者耐受抗生素,他们的青霉素过敏史被删除。结论:在这个项目中,大多数青霉素过敏标签都是基于临床标准和口服刺激而清除的,这突出了PEN-FAST的潜在益处。应向pcp提供扩大培训,以便在适当的环境中进行口腔挑战,以努力减轻患者护理的这一重大负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信