Adherence timescale impacts completion rates of high-frequency mobile cognitive assessments among older adults.

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Exploration of medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-11 DOI:10.37349/emed.2025.1001356
Kieffer Christianson, Meha Prabhu, Zachary T Popp, Md Salman Rahman, James Drane, Marissa Lee, Corinna Lathan, Honghuang Lin, Rhoda Au, Preeti Sunderaraman, Phillip H Hwang
{"title":"Adherence timescale impacts completion rates of high-frequency mobile cognitive assessments among older adults.","authors":"Kieffer Christianson, Meha Prabhu, Zachary T Popp, Md Salman Rahman, James Drane, Marissa Lee, Corinna Lathan, Honghuang Lin, Rhoda Au, Preeti Sunderaraman, Phillip H Hwang","doi":"10.37349/emed.2025.1001356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Mobile technology enables frequent, remote cognitive assessments, introducing new methodological opportunities and challenges. The study evaluated the feasibility of a high-frequency cognitive assessment schedule among older adults, in terms of total assessments and adherence to a prescribed schedule.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-three older adults were recruited from the Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (mean age = 73.5 years; 27.3% cognitively impaired; 57.6% female; 81.8% White, 18.2% Black). Participants downloaded the DANA Brain Vital mobile application on their own mobile devices during a remote study visit, and were provided a schedule with seventeen assessments to complete over one year at varying frequencies. The first segment contained three subsegments to be completed within one week, the second segment consisted of weekly subsegments spanning three weeks, and the third and fourth segments consisted of monthly subsegments spanning five and six months, respectively. Three adherence types were defined to reflect incrementally broader adherence timescales: subsegment adherence (strict adherence to each prescribed assessment period), segment adherence (completing the required number of assessments within each broader segment), and cumulative adherence (completing the total number of assessments irrespective of timing).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Completion rates differed depending on the adherence timescale and corresponding adherence type. Using the strictest adherence definition (subsegment adherence), completion rates declined (from 93.9% to 72.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.05) during the fourth segment. However, when a broader adherence timescale was applied, completion rates did not decline. Overall completion rates increased as adherence timescale parameters were broadened from subsegment adherence (60.6%) to segment adherence (78.8%), to cumulative adherence (90.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older adults, including those with cognitive impairment, are able to complete remote cognitive assessments at a high-frequency, but may not necessarily adhere to prescribed schedules. Future high-frequency studies should consider adherence as a potential behavioral variable to complement cognitive test data, while recognizing the potential influence of adherence timescale on interpreting completion rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":72999,"journal":{"name":"Exploration of medicine","volume":"6 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploration of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37349/emed.2025.1001356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Mobile technology enables frequent, remote cognitive assessments, introducing new methodological opportunities and challenges. The study evaluated the feasibility of a high-frequency cognitive assessment schedule among older adults, in terms of total assessments and adherence to a prescribed schedule.

Methods: Thirty-three older adults were recruited from the Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (mean age = 73.5 years; 27.3% cognitively impaired; 57.6% female; 81.8% White, 18.2% Black). Participants downloaded the DANA Brain Vital mobile application on their own mobile devices during a remote study visit, and were provided a schedule with seventeen assessments to complete over one year at varying frequencies. The first segment contained three subsegments to be completed within one week, the second segment consisted of weekly subsegments spanning three weeks, and the third and fourth segments consisted of monthly subsegments spanning five and six months, respectively. Three adherence types were defined to reflect incrementally broader adherence timescales: subsegment adherence (strict adherence to each prescribed assessment period), segment adherence (completing the required number of assessments within each broader segment), and cumulative adherence (completing the total number of assessments irrespective of timing).

Results: Completion rates differed depending on the adherence timescale and corresponding adherence type. Using the strictest adherence definition (subsegment adherence), completion rates declined (from 93.9% to 72.7%, p = 0.05) during the fourth segment. However, when a broader adherence timescale was applied, completion rates did not decline. Overall completion rates increased as adherence timescale parameters were broadened from subsegment adherence (60.6%) to segment adherence (78.8%), to cumulative adherence (90.9%).

Conclusions: Older adults, including those with cognitive impairment, are able to complete remote cognitive assessments at a high-frequency, but may not necessarily adhere to prescribed schedules. Future high-frequency studies should consider adherence as a potential behavioral variable to complement cognitive test data, while recognizing the potential influence of adherence timescale on interpreting completion rates.

依从性时间表影响老年人高频移动认知评估的完成率。
目的:移动技术使频繁的远程认知评估成为可能,引入了新的方法机遇和挑战。该研究评估了老年人高频认知评估时间表的可行性,包括总评估和对规定时间表的依从性。方法:从波士顿大学阿尔茨海默病研究中心招募33名老年人(平均年龄= 73.5岁,27.3%认知障碍,57.6%女性,81.8%白人,18.2%黑人)。在远程研究访问期间,参与者在自己的移动设备上下载了DANA Brain Vital移动应用程序,并提供了一份时间表,其中包括在一年内以不同频率完成的17项评估。第一部分包含三个要在一周内完成的子部分,第二部分由每周的子部分组成,时间跨度为三周,第三和第四部分由每月的子部分组成,时间跨度分别为5个月和6个月。定义了三种依从性类型,以反映逐渐扩大的依从性时间尺度:亚分段依从性(严格遵守每个规定的评估期),分段依从性(在每个更广泛的时间段内完成所需的评估数量)和累积依从性(完成评估的总数,而不考虑时间)。结果:完成率因依从性时间表和相应的依从性类型而异。使用最严格的依从性定义(亚段依从性),在第四段期间,完成率下降(从93.9%下降到72.7%,p = 0.05)。然而,当应用更广泛的依从性时间表时,完成率并没有下降。随着依从时间量表参数从亚段依从性(60.6%)扩大到段依从性(78.8%),再到累积依从性(90.9%),总体完成率也有所提高。结论:老年人,包括那些有认知障碍的老年人,能够完成高频的远程认知评估,但不一定要遵守规定的时间表。未来的高频研究应考虑依从性作为一个潜在的行为变量来补充认知测试数据,同时认识到依从性时间尺度对解释完成率的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信