{"title":"Humoral immune response to mRNA-based influenza vaccines in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Abdulrazzag Abdulaziz Othman, Hassan Albargy","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2025.361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Influenza causes substantial morbidity and mortality in older adults, and conventional inactivated vaccines often elicit suboptimal immune responses in this population. Recent phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated mRNA-based influenza vaccines, but a quantitative synthesis of their immunogenicity in adults aged ≥65 years is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether mRNA influenza vaccines yield higher seroconversion rates (SCRs) at 29 days post-vaccination compared to licensed inactivated vaccines in adults aged ≥65 years.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Hospital, out-patient and community-based RCTs conducted in the USA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from database inception to July 2025 for RCTs reporting SCR at 29 days post-mRNA influenza vaccination in adults aged ≥65 years. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>SCR at day 29 post-vaccination for each influenza strain (A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Victoria, B/Yamagata).</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>Seven RCTs out of 4 studies comprising 7,114 participants aged ≥65 years were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the seven RCTs (100% RCTs), mRNA vaccines achieved significantly higher SCRs than controls: A/H1N1 (RR 3.41; 95% CI 2.8-4.2), A/H3N2 (RR 3.54; 95% CI 2.9-4.3), B/Victoria (RR 2.83; 95% CI 2.3-3.5), and B/Yamagata (RR 3.34; 95% CI 2.7-4.2). Heterogeneity was high for all strains (I<sup>2</sup>>80%). Sensitivity analyses omitting one study at a time confirmed robustness of the pooled estimates. Funnel plots and Egger's test indicated possible small-study effects. Meta-regression found no significant association between vaccine dose and effect size.</p><p><strong>Risk of bias: </strong>Visual inspection of Begg's funnel plots for the A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B/Victoria strains revealed asymmetry, suggesting the possibility of publication bias.</p><p><strong>Heterogeneity: </strong>There was significant heterogeneity among studies for A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B/Victoria strains but not B/Yamagata strain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In adults aged ≥65 years, mRNA influenza vaccines elicit substantially higher seroconversion rates across all four seasonal strains compared with licensed inactivated vaccines, suggesting a promising strategy to enhance immune protection in this high-risk population. Findings should be interpreted with caution given the small number of studies available.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Low number of studies included limits full assessment of heterogeneity and bias.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD420251108768.</p>","PeriodicalId":93875,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi medicine","volume":"45 5","pages":"361-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2025.361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Influenza causes substantial morbidity and mortality in older adults, and conventional inactivated vaccines often elicit suboptimal immune responses in this population. Recent phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated mRNA-based influenza vaccines, but a quantitative synthesis of their immunogenicity in adults aged ≥65 years is lacking.
Objective: To determine whether mRNA influenza vaccines yield higher seroconversion rates (SCRs) at 29 days post-vaccination compared to licensed inactivated vaccines in adults aged ≥65 years.
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
Settings: Hospital, out-patient and community-based RCTs conducted in the USA.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from database inception to July 2025 for RCTs reporting SCR at 29 days post-mRNA influenza vaccination in adults aged ≥65 years. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects model.
Main outcome measure: SCR at day 29 post-vaccination for each influenza strain (A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Victoria, B/Yamagata).
Sample size: Seven RCTs out of 4 studies comprising 7,114 participants aged ≥65 years were included.
Results: Across the seven RCTs (100% RCTs), mRNA vaccines achieved significantly higher SCRs than controls: A/H1N1 (RR 3.41; 95% CI 2.8-4.2), A/H3N2 (RR 3.54; 95% CI 2.9-4.3), B/Victoria (RR 2.83; 95% CI 2.3-3.5), and B/Yamagata (RR 3.34; 95% CI 2.7-4.2). Heterogeneity was high for all strains (I2>80%). Sensitivity analyses omitting one study at a time confirmed robustness of the pooled estimates. Funnel plots and Egger's test indicated possible small-study effects. Meta-regression found no significant association between vaccine dose and effect size.
Risk of bias: Visual inspection of Begg's funnel plots for the A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B/Victoria strains revealed asymmetry, suggesting the possibility of publication bias.
Heterogeneity: There was significant heterogeneity among studies for A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B/Victoria strains but not B/Yamagata strain.
Conclusion: In adults aged ≥65 years, mRNA influenza vaccines elicit substantially higher seroconversion rates across all four seasonal strains compared with licensed inactivated vaccines, suggesting a promising strategy to enhance immune protection in this high-risk population. Findings should be interpreted with caution given the small number of studies available.
Limitations: Low number of studies included limits full assessment of heterogeneity and bias.