Agricultural practices can threaten soil resilience through changing feedback loops.

NPJ sustainable agriculture Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1038/s44264-025-00098-6
Alison M Carswell, Simon Willcock, Martin S A Blackwell, Hari Ram Upadhayay, Paul Harris, Graham McAuliffe, Andrew L Neal, M Jordana Rivero, Laura M Cardenas, Stephan M Haefele, Andrew P Whitmore, John A Dearing, Fusuo Zhang, Mark Farrell, Marijn Bauters, Pascal Boeckx, Yuri Jacques A B da Silva, Kwame Agyei Frimpong, Adrian L Collins
{"title":"Agricultural practices can threaten soil resilience through changing feedback loops.","authors":"Alison M Carswell, Simon Willcock, Martin S A Blackwell, Hari Ram Upadhayay, Paul Harris, Graham McAuliffe, Andrew L Neal, M Jordana Rivero, Laura M Cardenas, Stephan M Haefele, Andrew P Whitmore, John A Dearing, Fusuo Zhang, Mark Farrell, Marijn Bauters, Pascal Boeckx, Yuri Jacques A B da Silva, Kwame Agyei Frimpong, Adrian L Collins","doi":"10.1038/s44264-025-00098-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soil has supported terrestrial food production for millennia; however, agricultural intensification may affect its resilience. Using a systems-thinking approach, we reviewed the impacts of conventional-agriculture practices on soil resilience and identified alternative practices that could mitigate these effects. We found that many practices only affect soil resilience with their long-term repeated use. Lastly, we ranked the impacts that pose the greatest threats to soil resilience and, consequently, food and feed security.</p>","PeriodicalId":520846,"journal":{"name":"NPJ sustainable agriculture","volume":"3 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ sustainable agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-025-00098-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil has supported terrestrial food production for millennia; however, agricultural intensification may affect its resilience. Using a systems-thinking approach, we reviewed the impacts of conventional-agriculture practices on soil resilience and identified alternative practices that could mitigate these effects. We found that many practices only affect soil resilience with their long-term repeated use. Lastly, we ranked the impacts that pose the greatest threats to soil resilience and, consequently, food and feed security.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

农业实践可以通过改变反馈回路来威胁土壤的恢复力。
几千年来,土壤一直支持着陆地粮食生产;然而,农业集约化可能会影响其恢复能力。采用系统思维方法,我们回顾了传统农业实践对土壤恢复力的影响,并确定了可以减轻这些影响的替代实践。我们发现,许多做法只有在长期重复使用时才会影响土壤的恢复力。最后,我们对对土壤恢复力以及粮食和饲料安全构成最大威胁的影响进行了排名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信