Standardized ketamine infusion protocol for chronic refractory pain: a retrospective study of preliminary effectiveness and treatment completion.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Hallie Tankha, Sara Davin, Brittany Lapin, Yadi Li, Austin Kennemer, Andrew Schuster, Jijun Xu, Raghavan Gopalakrishnan, Pavan Tankha
{"title":"Standardized ketamine infusion protocol for chronic refractory pain: a retrospective study of preliminary effectiveness and treatment completion.","authors":"Hallie Tankha, Sara Davin, Brittany Lapin, Yadi Li, Austin Kennemer, Andrew Schuster, Jijun Xu, Raghavan Gopalakrishnan, Pavan Tankha","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic refractory pain presents limited treatment options and diminished quality of life. While ketamine treatment shows promise, protocol variations and safety concerns have hindered widespread adoption. This study evaluated preliminary effectiveness and rate of treatment completion for a standardized low-dose ketamine infusion therapy (KIT) protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study examined adult patients with chronic refractory pain who received KIT between May 2021 and October 2024 at the Cleveland Clinic's outpatient multidisciplinary pain clinic. Patients received a standardized protocol of 0.5 mg/kg ketamine infused over 40 min for five consecutive days. We measured effectiveness using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline, last infusion, and 3-month and 6-month post-treatment, and rate of treatment completion. The primary outcome of interest was the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvement on validated measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1034 patients (mean age 50.4±15.2 years; 71.8% female; 83.3% of white ethnicity), treatment completion was high, with 890 (86.1%) patients completing 5+ infusions. No adverse events were reported. Baseline measures reflected moderate impairment in pain interference, global physical health, fatigue, physical function, and depression. Between 20.3% and 46.4% of patients achieved clinically meaningful improvement on PROs from baseline to last infusion, with similar proportions maintained at 3-month and 6-month follow-up. Statistically significant mean improvements were observed across multiple domains; however, the majority of individual outcomes did not reach clinically meaningful thresholds. Patients demonstrated significant mean improvements in fatigue, pain interference, and social role satisfaction (mean change -2.1±7.7, -2.0±5.8, and 2.0±7.7, respectively), with improvements in depression, social role satisfaction, pain interference, self-efficacy, global health, and pain catastrophizing sustained through 6 months post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This standardized low-dose ketamine protocol demonstrated therapeutic benefit and high completion rates within a multidisciplinary care model. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm findings and explore treatment response factors across pain conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106907","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic refractory pain presents limited treatment options and diminished quality of life. While ketamine treatment shows promise, protocol variations and safety concerns have hindered widespread adoption. This study evaluated preliminary effectiveness and rate of treatment completion for a standardized low-dose ketamine infusion therapy (KIT) protocol.

Methods: This retrospective observational study examined adult patients with chronic refractory pain who received KIT between May 2021 and October 2024 at the Cleveland Clinic's outpatient multidisciplinary pain clinic. Patients received a standardized protocol of 0.5 mg/kg ketamine infused over 40 min for five consecutive days. We measured effectiveness using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline, last infusion, and 3-month and 6-month post-treatment, and rate of treatment completion. The primary outcome of interest was the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvement on validated measures.

Results: Among 1034 patients (mean age 50.4±15.2 years; 71.8% female; 83.3% of white ethnicity), treatment completion was high, with 890 (86.1%) patients completing 5+ infusions. No adverse events were reported. Baseline measures reflected moderate impairment in pain interference, global physical health, fatigue, physical function, and depression. Between 20.3% and 46.4% of patients achieved clinically meaningful improvement on PROs from baseline to last infusion, with similar proportions maintained at 3-month and 6-month follow-up. Statistically significant mean improvements were observed across multiple domains; however, the majority of individual outcomes did not reach clinically meaningful thresholds. Patients demonstrated significant mean improvements in fatigue, pain interference, and social role satisfaction (mean change -2.1±7.7, -2.0±5.8, and 2.0±7.7, respectively), with improvements in depression, social role satisfaction, pain interference, self-efficacy, global health, and pain catastrophizing sustained through 6 months post-treatment.

Discussion: This standardized low-dose ketamine protocol demonstrated therapeutic benefit and high completion rates within a multidisciplinary care model. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm findings and explore treatment response factors across pain conditions.

慢性难治性疼痛的标准氯胺酮输注方案:初步有效性和治疗完成的回顾性研究。
背景:慢性难治性疼痛的治疗选择有限,生活质量下降。虽然氯胺酮治疗显示出希望,但方案的变化和安全问题阻碍了广泛采用。本研究评估了标准化低剂量氯胺酮输注治疗(KIT)方案的初步有效性和治疗完成率。方法:这项回顾性观察性研究调查了2021年5月至2024年10月在克利夫兰诊所门诊多学科疼痛诊所接受KIT治疗的慢性难治性疼痛成年患者。患者接受标准方案0.5 mg/kg氯胺酮输注超过40分钟,连续5天。我们使用基线、最后一次输注、治疗后3个月和6个月的患者报告结果(PROs)和治疗完成率来衡量有效性。研究的主要结局是通过有效措施获得临床有意义改善的患者比例。结果:1034例患者(平均年龄50.4±15.2岁,女性占71.8%,白人占83.3%),治疗完成率高,其中890例(86.1%)患者完成5次以上输注。无不良事件报告。基线测量反映了疼痛干扰、整体身体健康、疲劳、身体功能和抑郁的中度损害。从基线到最后一次输注,20.3%至46.4%的患者在PROs方面取得了有临床意义的改善,在3个月和6个月的随访中,这一比例保持相似。在多个领域观察到具有统计学意义的平均改善;然而,大多数个体结果没有达到有临床意义的阈值。患者在疲劳、疼痛干扰和社会角色满意度方面表现出显著的平均改善(平均变化分别为-2.1±7.7、-2.0±5.8和2.0±7.7),在抑郁、社会角色满意度、疼痛干扰、自我效能、整体健康和疼痛灾难化方面的改善持续到治疗后6个月。讨论:这种标准化的低剂量氯胺酮方案在多学科护理模式中显示出治疗效果和高完成率。未来的随机对照试验有必要证实这些发现,并探索不同疼痛条件下的治疗反应因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信