A program for accelerating lactogenesis II using a breast pump shortly after cesarean section in Japan: A feasibility mixed-methods study

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Ai Miyauchi, Kaori Takahata, Yoko Idei, Takuya Shuo, Shigeko Horiuchi
{"title":"A program for accelerating lactogenesis II using a breast pump shortly after cesarean section in Japan: A feasibility mixed-methods study","authors":"Ai Miyauchi,&nbsp;Kaori Takahata,&nbsp;Yoko Idei,&nbsp;Takuya Shuo,&nbsp;Shigeko Horiuchi","doi":"10.1111/jjns.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the feasibility of a breast stimulation program using a breast pump shortly after cesarean section (CS) to enhance the onset of lactogenesis II.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used a convergent mixed-methods design. It provided an overall picture through quantitative results, which were complemented by qualitative findings. The results were presented using a joint display. Participants were full-term women who underwent CS at a regional perinatal hospital and nurse-midwives from January to March 2025. The program included: (1) providing information about breastfeeding after CS; and (2) providing breast pump–mediated nipple stimulation, starting within 6 h postpartum and continuing until day 2, at least four times daily under researcher supervision. Main outcomes focused on the feasibility of the program, including acceptability, practicality, and implementation. An eight-item questionnaire and open-ended questions were administered. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seven full-term women with planned CS and 29 nurse-midwives. Most used a breast pump four times within the first 24 h after CS. Women were satisfied with painless nipple stimulation and early milk expression. Both designs complemented each other, and the program was deemed acceptable based on early postpartum breast milk volume data. Identified challenges included pump operability, individual adaptation, and preparation time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The breast stimulation program initiated shortly after CS was feasible, well accepted, and aspects of breast milk volume. A future randomized controlled trial should consider individual differences and adjustments in the frequency of breast pump usage.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50265,"journal":{"name":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jjns.70026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the feasibility of a breast stimulation program using a breast pump shortly after cesarean section (CS) to enhance the onset of lactogenesis II.

Methods

We used a convergent mixed-methods design. It provided an overall picture through quantitative results, which were complemented by qualitative findings. The results were presented using a joint display. Participants were full-term women who underwent CS at a regional perinatal hospital and nurse-midwives from January to March 2025. The program included: (1) providing information about breastfeeding after CS; and (2) providing breast pump–mediated nipple stimulation, starting within 6 h postpartum and continuing until day 2, at least four times daily under researcher supervision. Main outcomes focused on the feasibility of the program, including acceptability, practicality, and implementation. An eight-item questionnaire and open-ended questions were administered. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis.

Results

Seven full-term women with planned CS and 29 nurse-midwives. Most used a breast pump four times within the first 24 h after CS. Women were satisfied with painless nipple stimulation and early milk expression. Both designs complemented each other, and the program was deemed acceptable based on early postpartum breast milk volume data. Identified challenges included pump operability, individual adaptation, and preparation time.

Conclusion

The breast stimulation program initiated shortly after CS was feasible, well accepted, and aspects of breast milk volume. A future randomized controlled trial should consider individual differences and adjustments in the frequency of breast pump usage.

Abstract Image

日本剖宫产术后使用吸奶器加速II型乳生成的方案:一项可行性混合方法研究。
目的:评估剖宫产术后使用吸乳器刺激乳房的可行性,以促进II型乳发生的发生。方法:采用收敛混合方法设计。它通过定量结果提供了一幅全貌,定量结果得到定性结果的补充。结果是用联合显示器显示的。参与者是在2025年1月至3月期间在地区围产期医院和护士助产士接受CS的足月妇女。该计划包括:(1)提供CS后母乳喂养的信息;(2)提供吸奶器介导的乳头刺激,从产后6小时开始,持续到第2天,在研究者的监督下每天至少4次。主要结果集中于方案的可行性,包括可接受性、实用性和可执行性。研究人员使用了一份包含八个项目的问卷和开放式问题。定量资料采用描述性统计分析;定性资料采用内容分析法进行分析。结果:7名足月孕妇计划CS, 29名护士助产士。大多数在产后24小时内使用了4次吸奶器。妇女对无痛乳头刺激和早期乳汁表达感到满意。两种设计相辅相成,基于产后早期母乳量数据,该方案被认为是可接受的。确定的挑战包括泵的可操作性、个体适应性和准备时间。结论:CS后不久开始的乳房刺激方案是可行的,被广泛接受,并在母乳量方面。未来的随机对照试验应考虑个体差异和吸奶器使用频率的调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japan Journal of Nursing Science is the official English language journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Science. The purpose of the Journal is to provide a mechanism to share knowledge related to improving health care and promoting the development of nursing. The Journal seeks original manuscripts reporting scholarly work on the art and science of nursing. Original articles may be empirical and qualitative studies, review articles, methodological articles, brief reports, case studies and letters to the Editor. Please see Instructions for Authors for detailed authorship qualification requirement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信