Bridging the Gap: Student Perspectives on Improving Undergraduate Implant Dentistry Education in Australia.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
An Tran, Tulio Fernandez-Medina
{"title":"Bridging the Gap: Student Perspectives on Improving Undergraduate Implant Dentistry Education in Australia.","authors":"An Tran, Tulio Fernandez-Medina","doi":"10.1002/jdd.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The proposed guidelines for implant dentistry education in Australian undergraduate dental programs from the 2010 Australian Consensus Workshop (ACW) have presented notable difficulties in their implementation. This study aims to explore the views of dental students regarding implant dentistry education and recommend improvements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was distributed to final year dental students (n = 73) in one of the Australian dental schools. The 18-question survey was structured into four sections, covering participants experience in implant dentistry, their confidence in applying knowledge acquired from the implant curricula, satisfaction with the implant curricula in terms of quality, quantity, and timing of delivery, and considerations for possible improvements. Multilinear regression analysis was exclusively conducted for Satisfaction Likert data sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 71.2% (n = 52). Most students reported low confidence in applying implant knowledge clinically (65.4%-80.7%), with a notable increase in confident responses in understanding theory following a practical workshop (from 7.7%-32.6%). Students unanimously agreed on the need for improvements, particularly emphasizing a greater focus on clinical observations (78.8%) and preclinical training (76.9%). The regression model was statistically significant for theory amount (F (1,45) = 4.2, p < 0.05) and Sim-Lab quality (F (1,45) = 5.7, p < 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Students expressed a lack of confidence in selecting and treating patients requiring implant dentistry. The quantity of theoretical content and the quality of Sim-Lab experiences were the factors that notably enhanced the satisfaction of students. Some of the obstacles identified by ACW 14 years ago persist in undergraduate dental education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The proposed guidelines for implant dentistry education in Australian undergraduate dental programs from the 2010 Australian Consensus Workshop (ACW) have presented notable difficulties in their implementation. This study aims to explore the views of dental students regarding implant dentistry education and recommend improvements.

Methods: A survey was distributed to final year dental students (n = 73) in one of the Australian dental schools. The 18-question survey was structured into four sections, covering participants experience in implant dentistry, their confidence in applying knowledge acquired from the implant curricula, satisfaction with the implant curricula in terms of quality, quantity, and timing of delivery, and considerations for possible improvements. Multilinear regression analysis was exclusively conducted for Satisfaction Likert data sets.

Results: The response rate was 71.2% (n = 52). Most students reported low confidence in applying implant knowledge clinically (65.4%-80.7%), with a notable increase in confident responses in understanding theory following a practical workshop (from 7.7%-32.6%). Students unanimously agreed on the need for improvements, particularly emphasizing a greater focus on clinical observations (78.8%) and preclinical training (76.9%). The regression model was statistically significant for theory amount (F (1,45) = 4.2, p < 0.05) and Sim-Lab quality (F (1,45) = 5.7, p < 0.02).

Conclusions: Students expressed a lack of confidence in selecting and treating patients requiring implant dentistry. The quantity of theoretical content and the quality of Sim-Lab experiences were the factors that notably enhanced the satisfaction of students. Some of the obstacles identified by ACW 14 years ago persist in undergraduate dental education.

弥合差距:学生对改善澳大利亚本科种植牙科教育的看法。
目的:2010年澳大利亚共识研讨会(ACW)提出的澳大利亚本科牙科课程种植牙科教育指南在实施中遇到了明显的困难。本研究旨在探讨牙科学生对种植牙教育的看法,并提出改善建议。方法:对澳大利亚一所牙科学校的最后一年牙科学生(73人)进行调查。18个问题的调查分为四个部分,包括参与者在种植牙科方面的经验,他们对应用从种植课程中获得的知识的信心,对种植课程的质量,数量和交付时间的满意度,以及对可能改进的考虑。多元线性回归分析仅对满意度李克特数据集进行。结果:有效率为71.2% (n = 52)。大多数学生对临床应用种植体知识的信心较低(65.4%-80.7%),在实践研讨会之后,对理论理解的信心显著增加(从7.7%-32.6%)。学生们一致认为需要改进,特别是强调更多地关注临床观察(78.8%)和临床前培训(76.9%)。回归模型对理论量(F (1,45) = 4.2, p < 0.05)和Sim-Lab质量(F (1,45) = 5.7, p < 0.02)有统计学意义。结论:学生对选择和治疗需要种植牙的患者缺乏信心。理论内容的数量和模拟实验体验的质量是显著提高学生满意度的因素。ACW 14年前发现的一些障碍仍然存在于本科牙科教育中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dental Education
Journal of Dental Education 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信