{"title":"Bridging the Gap: Student Perspectives on Improving Undergraduate Implant Dentistry Education in Australia.","authors":"An Tran, Tulio Fernandez-Medina","doi":"10.1002/jdd.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The proposed guidelines for implant dentistry education in Australian undergraduate dental programs from the 2010 Australian Consensus Workshop (ACW) have presented notable difficulties in their implementation. This study aims to explore the views of dental students regarding implant dentistry education and recommend improvements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was distributed to final year dental students (n = 73) in one of the Australian dental schools. The 18-question survey was structured into four sections, covering participants experience in implant dentistry, their confidence in applying knowledge acquired from the implant curricula, satisfaction with the implant curricula in terms of quality, quantity, and timing of delivery, and considerations for possible improvements. Multilinear regression analysis was exclusively conducted for Satisfaction Likert data sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 71.2% (n = 52). Most students reported low confidence in applying implant knowledge clinically (65.4%-80.7%), with a notable increase in confident responses in understanding theory following a practical workshop (from 7.7%-32.6%). Students unanimously agreed on the need for improvements, particularly emphasizing a greater focus on clinical observations (78.8%) and preclinical training (76.9%). The regression model was statistically significant for theory amount (F (1,45) = 4.2, p < 0.05) and Sim-Lab quality (F (1,45) = 5.7, p < 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Students expressed a lack of confidence in selecting and treating patients requiring implant dentistry. The quantity of theoretical content and the quality of Sim-Lab experiences were the factors that notably enhanced the satisfaction of students. Some of the obstacles identified by ACW 14 years ago persist in undergraduate dental education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The proposed guidelines for implant dentistry education in Australian undergraduate dental programs from the 2010 Australian Consensus Workshop (ACW) have presented notable difficulties in their implementation. This study aims to explore the views of dental students regarding implant dentistry education and recommend improvements.
Methods: A survey was distributed to final year dental students (n = 73) in one of the Australian dental schools. The 18-question survey was structured into four sections, covering participants experience in implant dentistry, their confidence in applying knowledge acquired from the implant curricula, satisfaction with the implant curricula in terms of quality, quantity, and timing of delivery, and considerations for possible improvements. Multilinear regression analysis was exclusively conducted for Satisfaction Likert data sets.
Results: The response rate was 71.2% (n = 52). Most students reported low confidence in applying implant knowledge clinically (65.4%-80.7%), with a notable increase in confident responses in understanding theory following a practical workshop (from 7.7%-32.6%). Students unanimously agreed on the need for improvements, particularly emphasizing a greater focus on clinical observations (78.8%) and preclinical training (76.9%). The regression model was statistically significant for theory amount (F (1,45) = 4.2, p < 0.05) and Sim-Lab quality (F (1,45) = 5.7, p < 0.02).
Conclusions: Students expressed a lack of confidence in selecting and treating patients requiring implant dentistry. The quantity of theoretical content and the quality of Sim-Lab experiences were the factors that notably enhanced the satisfaction of students. Some of the obstacles identified by ACW 14 years ago persist in undergraduate dental education.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.