Visual attention and role recognition in bullying vignettes in preadolescents and adults.

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Laura Menabò, Annalisa Guarini
{"title":"Visual attention and role recognition in bullying vignettes in preadolescents and adults.","authors":"Laura Menabò, Annalisa Guarini","doi":"10.1111/bjep.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bullying research has traditionally relied on self-reported measures such as questionnaires and interviews. Previous studies have shown developmental differences in attention mechanisms, with adults relying more on top-down processing and younger individuals on bottom-up attention. However, it remains unclear whether these differences extend to bullying scene observation and how they influence the perception of different bullying roles.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study examined differences in visual attention (total fixation duration, visit count, fixation count) and verbal recognition of bullying roles between preadolescents and adults.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>The study included 80 participants: 37 preadolescents (M<sub>age</sub> = 10.11, SD = 1.10) and 43 adults (M<sub>age</sub> = 30.72, SD = 4.89).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants viewed 12 vignette-based bullying scenes while their eye movements were recorded using an eye tracker. They then provided verbal descriptions of each observed vignette.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups primarily fixated on bullies and victims, reinforcing the centrality of the bully-victim dyad. However, adults allocated significantly more attention to the other roles and described them with greater accuracy than preadolescents. In particular, in adults, defenders and pro-bullies attracted more fixations, visits, and total fixation time, while bystanders received more total fixation time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that adults process bullying situations in a more structured and holistic manner, likely due to top-down attentional mechanisms shaped by social experience. These developmental differences highlight the crucial role of adults in fostering awareness of all bullying roles among preadolescents, emphasizing the need for interventions that encourage broader role recognition beyond the bully-victim dynamic.</p>","PeriodicalId":51367,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.70039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bullying research has traditionally relied on self-reported measures such as questionnaires and interviews. Previous studies have shown developmental differences in attention mechanisms, with adults relying more on top-down processing and younger individuals on bottom-up attention. However, it remains unclear whether these differences extend to bullying scene observation and how they influence the perception of different bullying roles.

Aims: This study examined differences in visual attention (total fixation duration, visit count, fixation count) and verbal recognition of bullying roles between preadolescents and adults.

Sample: The study included 80 participants: 37 preadolescents (Mage = 10.11, SD = 1.10) and 43 adults (Mage = 30.72, SD = 4.89).

Methods: Participants viewed 12 vignette-based bullying scenes while their eye movements were recorded using an eye tracker. They then provided verbal descriptions of each observed vignette.

Results: Both groups primarily fixated on bullies and victims, reinforcing the centrality of the bully-victim dyad. However, adults allocated significantly more attention to the other roles and described them with greater accuracy than preadolescents. In particular, in adults, defenders and pro-bullies attracted more fixations, visits, and total fixation time, while bystanders received more total fixation time.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that adults process bullying situations in a more structured and holistic manner, likely due to top-down attentional mechanisms shaped by social experience. These developmental differences highlight the crucial role of adults in fostering awareness of all bullying roles among preadolescents, emphasizing the need for interventions that encourage broader role recognition beyond the bully-victim dynamic.

青少年前和成人欺负小插曲中的视觉注意和角色识别。
背景:欺凌研究传统上依赖于自我报告的措施,如问卷调查和访谈。先前的研究显示了注意机制的发展差异,成年人更多地依赖于自上而下的处理,而年轻人更多地依赖于自下而上的注意。然而,这些差异是否延伸到欺凌现场观察以及它们如何影响不同欺凌角色的感知尚不清楚。目的:本研究探讨了青少年前和成人在欺凌角色的视觉注意(总注视时间、探视次数、注视次数)和言语识别方面的差异。样本:该研究包括80名参与者:37名学龄前儿童(Mage = 10.11, SD = 1.10)和43名成年人(Mage = 30.72, SD = 4.89)。方法:参与者观看了12个基于小插曲的欺凌场景,同时使用眼动仪记录他们的眼球运动。然后,他们对每个观察到的小插曲进行口头描述。结果:两组的注意力主要集中在欺凌者和受害者身上,强化了欺凌者和受害者的中心地位。然而,与青春期前相比,成年人对其他角色分配了更多的注意力,并能更准确地描述它们。特别是在成人中,防卫者和亲欺凌者吸引了更多的注视、访问和总注视时间,而旁观者获得了更多的总注视时间。结论:研究结果表明,成年人以一种更加结构化和整体的方式处理欺凌情况,可能是由于社会经验形成的自上而下的注意机制。这些发育差异突出了成年人在培养对青春期前所有欺凌角色的认识方面的关键作用,强调需要采取干预措施,鼓励在欺凌受害者动态之外更广泛地认识角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Educational Psychology publishes original psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels including: - cognition - learning - motivation - literacy - numeracy and language - behaviour - social-emotional development - developmental difficulties linked to educational psychology or the psychology of education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信