Evaluation of spirometric lung function among healthcare professionals working in operating theatres: A comparative cross‑sectional study.

Q3 Medicine
J B Ibrahim, I A Ali, M A Mohammed, I A Ahmed, O A Musa
{"title":"Evaluation of spirometric lung function among healthcare professionals working in operating theatres: A comparative cross‑sectional study.","authors":"J B Ibrahim, I A Ali, M A Mohammed, I A Ahmed, O A Musa","doi":"10.7196/AJTCCM.2025.v31i2.2639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inhalational exposures in the operating theatre, such as waste anaesthetic gases, surgical smoke, airborne particles, microbiological contaminants and cleaning agents, may compromise lung function.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate pulmonary function test (PFT) values of operating theatre staff who work in resource-constrained settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This comparative cross-sectional study included 184 participants (exposed and matched unexposed cohorts). Data were acquired via a structured questionnaire, and the standard procedure was used to calculate each participant's forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV<sub>1</sub>), FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ratio and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR). Mann-Whitney U-tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, Spearman analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were used to investigate the statistical relationships between variables. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort comprised 38 surgeons, 28 anaesthetists, 14 scrub nurses and 12 assistants, with a median age of 34 years. The median age for the matched unexposed cohort was 33 years. The healthcare staff had significantly lower FEV<sub>1</sub> , FVC and PEFR values and FEV<sub>1</sub> /FVC ratios (p<0.05) than the unexposed cohort. These values decreased significantly as staff experience/exposure time increased (p=0.001). Furthermore, the scrub nurses and assistants had significantly lower PFT values than the other healthcare groups (p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study showed that PFT values were considerably lower among operating theatre healthcare staff than in a matched unexposed group, with measures decreasing as staff experience/duration of exposure rose.</p><p><strong>Study synopsis: </strong><b>What the study adds.</b> Since occupational lung disease places significant pressure on the healthcare system, this study evaluated the spirometric lung function of healthcare staff who worked in an environment without proper respiratory safeguards.<b>Implications of the findings.</b> The hospital environment may trigger respiratory problems, particularly for healthcare staff who work in operating theatres, restricting their economic productivity. It is therefore vital to establish, execute and maintain high-quality procedures that guarantee workplace health and safety, especially in settings with limited resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":52847,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine","volume":"31 2","pages":"e2639"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/AJTCCM.2025.v31i2.2639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inhalational exposures in the operating theatre, such as waste anaesthetic gases, surgical smoke, airborne particles, microbiological contaminants and cleaning agents, may compromise lung function.

Objectives: To evaluate pulmonary function test (PFT) values of operating theatre staff who work in resource-constrained settings.

Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study included 184 participants (exposed and matched unexposed cohorts). Data were acquired via a structured questionnaire, and the standard procedure was used to calculate each participant's forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR). Mann-Whitney U-tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, Spearman analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were used to investigate the statistical relationships between variables. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The study cohort comprised 38 surgeons, 28 anaesthetists, 14 scrub nurses and 12 assistants, with a median age of 34 years. The median age for the matched unexposed cohort was 33 years. The healthcare staff had significantly lower FEV1 , FVC and PEFR values and FEV1 /FVC ratios (p<0.05) than the unexposed cohort. These values decreased significantly as staff experience/exposure time increased (p=0.001). Furthermore, the scrub nurses and assistants had significantly lower PFT values than the other healthcare groups (p=0.001).

Conclusion: The study showed that PFT values were considerably lower among operating theatre healthcare staff than in a matched unexposed group, with measures decreasing as staff experience/duration of exposure rose.

Study synopsis: What the study adds. Since occupational lung disease places significant pressure on the healthcare system, this study evaluated the spirometric lung function of healthcare staff who worked in an environment without proper respiratory safeguards.Implications of the findings. The hospital environment may trigger respiratory problems, particularly for healthcare staff who work in operating theatres, restricting their economic productivity. It is therefore vital to establish, execute and maintain high-quality procedures that guarantee workplace health and safety, especially in settings with limited resources.

评估在手术室工作的医护人员的肺功能:一项比较横断面研究。
背景:手术室的吸入性暴露,如麻醉废气、手术烟雾、空气颗粒、微生物污染物和清洁剂,可能损害肺功能。目的:评价资源受限环境下手术室工作人员肺功能测试(PFT)的价值。方法:这项比较横断面研究包括184名参与者(暴露组和匹配的未暴露组)。通过结构化问卷获取数据,并采用标准程序计算每位参与者的用力肺活量(FVC)、1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、FEV1/FVC比率和呼气峰流量(PEFR)。采用Mann-Whitney u检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验、Spearman分析和多元线性回归分析考察变量间的统计关系。p值结果:研究队列包括38名外科医生,28名麻醉师,14名消毒护士和12名助理,中位年龄34岁。匹配的未暴露队列的中位年龄为33岁。结论:手术室医护人员的FEV1、FVC、PEFR值和FEV1 /FVC比值明显低于匹配的未暴露组,且随暴露经验/暴露时间的增加而降低。研究简介:研究补充了什么。由于职业性肺病给卫生保健系统带来了巨大的压力,本研究评估了在没有适当呼吸保障的环境中工作的卫生保健人员的肺功能。研究结果的含义。医院环境可能引发呼吸问题,特别是对在手术室工作的医护人员而言,这限制了他们的经济生产力。因此,必须建立、执行和保持保证工作场所健康和安全的高质量程序,特别是在资源有限的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine
African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书