Disability-oriented data protection in AI-enabled assistive technologies: bridging gaps in China's legal framework.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Zhaodi Yu, Zhenxiang Xu, Jiangang Qi
{"title":"Disability-oriented data protection in AI-enabled assistive technologies: bridging gaps in China's legal framework.","authors":"Zhaodi Yu, Zhenxiang Xu, Jiangang Qi","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2568940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial Intelligence-enabled Assistive Technologies (AI-enabled ATs) enhance independence and inclusion for persons with disabilities (PWD) but rely on sensitive personal data, raising significant privacy concerns. In China, existing laws provide a multi-tiered framework for data protection; however, they remain too general to address the unique vulnerabilities of disability-related data.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using normative and comparative legal analysis, this study examines China's personal information protection legal framework alongside international regimes such as the GDPR and Australia's Privacy Act to reveal structural deficiencies and draw lessons from global practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study demonstrates that data generated by AI-enabled ATs should be classified as sensitive personal information requiring stricter safeguards. Current regulations face legitimacy challenges, including weakened informed consent mechanisms and effectiveness gaps, as general norms fail to capture the heightened risks for PWD. To address these gaps, the study introduces stakeholder theory and develops an adapted Pyramid Model of the Social Licence to Operate (SLO), tailored to disability contexts. By aligning legitimacy, credibility, and trust as progressive boundaries, the model integrates compliance with participatory governance, ensuring that PWD move from passive data subjects to active co-governors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the importance of disability-oriented approaches within the personal information protection framework. By integrating stakeholder perspectives and participatory governance, the proposed framework contributes to safeguarding the rights of PWD while fostering responsible technological innovation. These insights carry implications for refining China's regulatory system and informing comparative debates on inclusive data governance in the digital era.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2568940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial Intelligence-enabled Assistive Technologies (AI-enabled ATs) enhance independence and inclusion for persons with disabilities (PWD) but rely on sensitive personal data, raising significant privacy concerns. In China, existing laws provide a multi-tiered framework for data protection; however, they remain too general to address the unique vulnerabilities of disability-related data.

Materials and methods: Using normative and comparative legal analysis, this study examines China's personal information protection legal framework alongside international regimes such as the GDPR and Australia's Privacy Act to reveal structural deficiencies and draw lessons from global practice.

Results: The study demonstrates that data generated by AI-enabled ATs should be classified as sensitive personal information requiring stricter safeguards. Current regulations face legitimacy challenges, including weakened informed consent mechanisms and effectiveness gaps, as general norms fail to capture the heightened risks for PWD. To address these gaps, the study introduces stakeholder theory and develops an adapted Pyramid Model of the Social Licence to Operate (SLO), tailored to disability contexts. By aligning legitimacy, credibility, and trust as progressive boundaries, the model integrates compliance with participatory governance, ensuring that PWD move from passive data subjects to active co-governors.

Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of disability-oriented approaches within the personal information protection framework. By integrating stakeholder perspectives and participatory governance, the proposed framework contributes to safeguarding the rights of PWD while fostering responsible technological innovation. These insights carry implications for refining China's regulatory system and informing comparative debates on inclusive data governance in the digital era.

人工智能辅助技术中以残疾人为导向的数据保护:弥合中国法律框架的差距。
背景:人工智能辅助技术(AI-enabled ATs)增强了残疾人的独立性和包容性,但依赖于敏感的个人数据,引起了重大的隐私问题。在中国,现有法律为数据保护提供了一个多层次的框架;然而,它们仍然过于笼统,无法解决与残疾有关的数据的独特脆弱性。材料和方法:本研究采用规范性和比较法分析,将中国的个人信息保护法律框架与国际制度(如GDPR和澳大利亚隐私法)进行比较,以揭示结构性缺陷,并从全球实践中吸取教训。结果:研究表明,启用人工智能的ATs产生的数据应归类为敏感个人信息,需要更严格的保护措施。目前的法规面临合法性挑战,包括知情同意机制的削弱和有效性差距,因为一般规范未能反映出残疾人士面临的高风险。为了解决这些差距,该研究引入了利益相关者理论,并开发了一种针对残疾背景量身定制的社会经营许可证金字塔模型。通过将合法性、可信度和信任作为渐进式边界,该模型将合规性与参与式治理结合起来,确保PWD从被动的数据主体转变为主动的共同管理者。结论:本研究强调了在个人信息保护框架中以残疾为导向的方法的重要性。通过整合利益相关者的观点和参与式管治,拟议的框架有助于维护残疾人士的权利,同时促进负责任的技术创新。这些见解有助于完善中国的监管体系,并为数字时代包容性数据治理的比较辩论提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信