Predictive Analysis for First Submission of Generic Drug Application for Orphan Drug Products Using Random Survival Forest

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Robert Hopefl, Jing Wang, Abhinav Ram Mohan, Wei-Jhe Sun, Myong-Jin Kim, Meng Hu, Lanyan Fang
{"title":"Predictive Analysis for First Submission of Generic Drug Application for Orphan Drug Products Using Random Survival Forest","authors":"Robert Hopefl,&nbsp;Jing Wang,&nbsp;Abhinav Ram Mohan,&nbsp;Wei-Jhe Sun,&nbsp;Myong-Jin Kim,&nbsp;Meng Hu,&nbsp;Lanyan Fang","doi":"10.1111/cts.70365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rare diseases affect a small population of patients, resulting in low incentives for developing orphan drug products (ODPs). The United States Congress passed the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 to incentivize pharmaceutical manufacturers to develop drugs to treat rare diseases. However, ODPs generally have higher treatment costs than non-ODP treatments. Developing generic ODPs can benefit patients by increasing market competition and providing alternate treatment options. This research aims to identify factors influencing the first submission of abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) for generic orphan drugs. Data were collected from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) databases (including but not limited to the FDA Orphan Drug Designations and Approvals database, Orange Book, and the internal drug product complexity designation) and the IQVIA sales database to inform the drug product information, regulatory factors, and pharmacoeconomic factors. The Random Survival Forest (RSF) machine learning method was employed to conduct the analysis for New Chemical Entities (NCEs) and non-NCEs. The modeling analysis was adequately assessed through both internal and external validations. For NCEs and non-NCEs, the RSF was able to predict ANDA submission with a repeated cross-validation C-index of 0.675 ± 0.0261 (C-index of full training dataset: 0.915) and 0.754 ± 0.0441 (C-index of full training dataset: 0.838), respectively. The variables with the highest importance in the RSF model to predict ANDA submission of NCE ODPs were sales data, while for non-NCEs, regulatory data was the most important (i.e., availability of product-specific guidances (PSGs)). As more data becomes available in the future, the RSF methodology will likely be able to predict ANDA submissions of ODPs more effectively. The model-informed results may be utilized in future intervention strategies to promote ANDA submissions for orphan drugs and to increase the availability of generic ODPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rare diseases affect a small population of patients, resulting in low incentives for developing orphan drug products (ODPs). The United States Congress passed the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 to incentivize pharmaceutical manufacturers to develop drugs to treat rare diseases. However, ODPs generally have higher treatment costs than non-ODP treatments. Developing generic ODPs can benefit patients by increasing market competition and providing alternate treatment options. This research aims to identify factors influencing the first submission of abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) for generic orphan drugs. Data were collected from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) databases (including but not limited to the FDA Orphan Drug Designations and Approvals database, Orange Book, and the internal drug product complexity designation) and the IQVIA sales database to inform the drug product information, regulatory factors, and pharmacoeconomic factors. The Random Survival Forest (RSF) machine learning method was employed to conduct the analysis for New Chemical Entities (NCEs) and non-NCEs. The modeling analysis was adequately assessed through both internal and external validations. For NCEs and non-NCEs, the RSF was able to predict ANDA submission with a repeated cross-validation C-index of 0.675 ± 0.0261 (C-index of full training dataset: 0.915) and 0.754 ± 0.0441 (C-index of full training dataset: 0.838), respectively. The variables with the highest importance in the RSF model to predict ANDA submission of NCE ODPs were sales data, while for non-NCEs, regulatory data was the most important (i.e., availability of product-specific guidances (PSGs)). As more data becomes available in the future, the RSF methodology will likely be able to predict ANDA submissions of ODPs more effectively. The model-informed results may be utilized in future intervention strategies to promote ANDA submissions for orphan drugs and to increase the availability of generic ODPs.

Abstract Image

基于随机生存森林的孤儿药仿制药首次申报预测分析
罕见病影响一小部分患者,导致开发孤儿药产品(odp)的动机较低。1983年,美国国会通过了《孤儿药物法案》,鼓励制药商开发治疗罕见疾病的药物。然而,odp治疗的费用通常高于非odp治疗。通过增加市场竞争和提供替代治疗选择,开发仿制odp可使患者受益。本研究旨在找出影响孤儿药仿制药简略新药申请(anda)首次提交的因素。数据收集自美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)数据库(包括但不限于FDA孤儿药指定和批准数据库、橙皮书和内部药品复杂性指定)和IQVIA销售数据库,以告知药品信息、监管因素和药物经济学因素。采用随机生存森林(RSF)机器学习方法对新化学实体(nce)和非nce进行分析。通过内部和外部验证对建模分析进行了充分的评估。对于nce和非nce, RSF能够预测ANDA提交,重复交叉验证的c -指数分别为0.675±0.0261(完整训练数据集的c -指数为0.915)和0.754±0.0441(完整训练数据集的c -指数为0.838)。在RSF模型中,预测NCE odp提交ANDA最重要的变量是销售数据,而对于非NCE,监管数据是最重要的(即产品特定指南(psg)的可用性)。随着未来更多的数据可用,RSF方法可能能够更有效地预测odp的ANDA提交情况。基于模型的结果可用于未来的干预策略,以促进孤儿药的ANDA申请,并增加仿制药odp的可获得性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信