Racial and Ethnic Inequities in the Relationship Between State Home and Community-Based Services Expenditures and Long-Term Care Utilization in the United States: A Fixed-Effects Analysis.

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Ah-Reum Lee, Yulin Yang, Thomas Rapp, Jacqueline M Torres
{"title":"Racial and Ethnic Inequities in the Relationship Between State Home and Community-Based Services Expenditures and Long-Term Care Utilization in the United States: A Fixed-Effects Analysis.","authors":"Ah-Reum Lee, Yulin Yang, Thomas Rapp, Jacqueline M Torres","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2025.2568430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite decades of increased spending on home and community-based services (HCBS) under Medicaid, the impact of these expenditures on long-term services and supports (LTSS) utilization across racial and ethnic groups remains unclear. This study analyzes state-level HCBS expenditures from 1996 to 2016, linked to individual-level data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS; 1998-2018). The sample includes 3,097 Medicaid beneficiaries aged 65 and older with difficulties in daily living (6,750 person-wave observations). Multivariate logit models were employed, controlling for individual socio-demographic factors, state and time fixed effects, and time-varying state-level characteristics. Among non-Hispanic White older adults, higher state-level HCBS spending was associated with a greater use of home health care services (β: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.25) and specialized health facilities (β: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.34). These protective effects were less evident for Black and Hispanic older adults, though limited statistical power may have prevented detecting significant effects in these subgroups. The findings suggest inequities in the benefits of increased HCBS funding, with the benefits primarily concentrated among White older adults. Further research is needed to explore mechanisms behind these patterns, including structural barriers to LTSS access.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2025.2568430","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite decades of increased spending on home and community-based services (HCBS) under Medicaid, the impact of these expenditures on long-term services and supports (LTSS) utilization across racial and ethnic groups remains unclear. This study analyzes state-level HCBS expenditures from 1996 to 2016, linked to individual-level data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS; 1998-2018). The sample includes 3,097 Medicaid beneficiaries aged 65 and older with difficulties in daily living (6,750 person-wave observations). Multivariate logit models were employed, controlling for individual socio-demographic factors, state and time fixed effects, and time-varying state-level characteristics. Among non-Hispanic White older adults, higher state-level HCBS spending was associated with a greater use of home health care services (β: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.25) and specialized health facilities (β: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.34). These protective effects were less evident for Black and Hispanic older adults, though limited statistical power may have prevented detecting significant effects in these subgroups. The findings suggest inequities in the benefits of increased HCBS funding, with the benefits primarily concentrated among White older adults. Further research is needed to explore mechanisms behind these patterns, including structural barriers to LTSS access.

美国国家家庭和社区服务支出与长期护理利用之间关系中的种族和民族不平等:固定效应分析。
尽管数十年来在医疗补助下家庭和社区服务(HCBS)上的支出有所增加,但这些支出对跨种族和族裔群体的长期服务和支持(LTSS)利用的影响仍不清楚。本研究分析了1996年至2016年州一级HCBS支出,并将其与健康与退休研究(HRS; 1998-2018)的个人层面数据联系起来。样本包括3097名65岁及以上有日常生活困难的医疗补助受益人(6750人波观察)。采用多元logit模型,控制了个体社会人口因素、状态和时间固定效应以及时变的国家级特征。在非西班牙裔白人老年人中,较高的州级HCBS支出与更多地使用家庭卫生保健服务(β: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.25)和专业卫生设施(β: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.34)相关。这些保护作用在黑人和西班牙裔老年人中不太明显,尽管有限的统计能力可能阻止了在这些亚组中检测到显著的效果。研究结果表明,增加HCBS资金的好处不公平,好处主要集中在白人老年人中。需要进一步的研究来探索这些模式背后的机制,包括LTSS访问的结构性障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim. The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信