Racial and Ethnic Inequities in the Relationship Between State Home and Community-Based Services Expenditures and Long-Term Care Utilization in the United States: A Fixed-Effects Analysis.
Ah-Reum Lee, Yulin Yang, Thomas Rapp, Jacqueline M Torres
{"title":"Racial and Ethnic Inequities in the Relationship Between State Home and Community-Based Services Expenditures and Long-Term Care Utilization in the United States: A Fixed-Effects Analysis.","authors":"Ah-Reum Lee, Yulin Yang, Thomas Rapp, Jacqueline M Torres","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2025.2568430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite decades of increased spending on home and community-based services (HCBS) under Medicaid, the impact of these expenditures on long-term services and supports (LTSS) utilization across racial and ethnic groups remains unclear. This study analyzes state-level HCBS expenditures from 1996 to 2016, linked to individual-level data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS; 1998-2018). The sample includes 3,097 Medicaid beneficiaries aged 65 and older with difficulties in daily living (6,750 person-wave observations). Multivariate logit models were employed, controlling for individual socio-demographic factors, state and time fixed effects, and time-varying state-level characteristics. Among non-Hispanic White older adults, higher state-level HCBS spending was associated with a greater use of home health care services (β: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.25) and specialized health facilities (β: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.34). These protective effects were less evident for Black and Hispanic older adults, though limited statistical power may have prevented detecting significant effects in these subgroups. The findings suggest inequities in the benefits of increased HCBS funding, with the benefits primarily concentrated among White older adults. Further research is needed to explore mechanisms behind these patterns, including structural barriers to LTSS access.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2025.2568430","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite decades of increased spending on home and community-based services (HCBS) under Medicaid, the impact of these expenditures on long-term services and supports (LTSS) utilization across racial and ethnic groups remains unclear. This study analyzes state-level HCBS expenditures from 1996 to 2016, linked to individual-level data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS; 1998-2018). The sample includes 3,097 Medicaid beneficiaries aged 65 and older with difficulties in daily living (6,750 person-wave observations). Multivariate logit models were employed, controlling for individual socio-demographic factors, state and time fixed effects, and time-varying state-level characteristics. Among non-Hispanic White older adults, higher state-level HCBS spending was associated with a greater use of home health care services (β: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.25) and specialized health facilities (β: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.34). These protective effects were less evident for Black and Hispanic older adults, though limited statistical power may have prevented detecting significant effects in these subgroups. The findings suggest inequities in the benefits of increased HCBS funding, with the benefits primarily concentrated among White older adults. Further research is needed to explore mechanisms behind these patterns, including structural barriers to LTSS access.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim.
The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.