IsoPSA density improves risk stratification and biopsy decision-making for clinically significant prostate cancer.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Betty Wang, Tarik Benidir, Kristina Dortche, Jennifer Bullen, Zaeem Lone, Nour Abdallah, Martin Hofmann, Mohamed Eltemamy, Robert Abouassaly, Nima Almassi, Zeyad Schwen, Ruben Olivares, Andrei Purysko, Jane Nguyen, Georges-Pascal Haber, Jihad Kaouk, Eric Klein, Christopher J Weight, Alp Tuna Beksac
{"title":"IsoPSA density improves risk stratification and biopsy decision-making for clinically significant prostate cancer.","authors":"Betty Wang, Tarik Benidir, Kristina Dortche, Jennifer Bullen, Zaeem Lone, Nour Abdallah, Martin Hofmann, Mohamed Eltemamy, Robert Abouassaly, Nima Almassi, Zeyad Schwen, Ruben Olivares, Andrei Purysko, Jane Nguyen, Georges-Pascal Haber, Jihad Kaouk, Eric Klein, Christopher J Weight, Alp Tuna Beksac","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of IsoPSA density for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csCaP), and its utility in guiding biopsy decision-making.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of 574 patients who underwent IsoPSA testing, prostate MRI, and image-guided biopsy within 1 year. IsoPSA density was calculated as IsoPSA value divided by MRI-derived prostate volume. Multivariable logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and decision curve analysis were used to assess predictive value. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients with large prostates (>70 ml) and negative MRI (PI-RADS 1-2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of csCaP on biopsy was 33.8%. IsoPSA density was an independent predictor of csCaP and performed similarly to PSA density, while outperforming PSA and IsoPSA in ROC and decision curve analyses. In the full cohort, IsoPSA density achieved an AUC of 0.69 and demonstrated a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 79% at the optimal cutoff of 0.21. Among men with negative MRI (n = 238), an IsoPSA density threshold of 0.17 yielded an NPV of 97% and sensitivity of 85% for ruling out csCaP. In men with large prostates, higher IsoPSA density trended with increased csCaP risk, though not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IsoPSA density performed comparably to PSA density and outperformed traditional clinical predictors of csCaP. In MRI-negative men, its high negative predictive value supports its use as a non-invasive tool to reduce unnecessary biopsies. IsoPSA density may serve as a valuable adjunct in contemporary prostate cancer diagnostic pathways and warrants further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.09.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of IsoPSA density for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csCaP), and its utility in guiding biopsy decision-making.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 574 patients who underwent IsoPSA testing, prostate MRI, and image-guided biopsy within 1 year. IsoPSA density was calculated as IsoPSA value divided by MRI-derived prostate volume. Multivariable logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and decision curve analysis were used to assess predictive value. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients with large prostates (>70 ml) and negative MRI (PI-RADS 1-2).

Results: The overall prevalence of csCaP on biopsy was 33.8%. IsoPSA density was an independent predictor of csCaP and performed similarly to PSA density, while outperforming PSA and IsoPSA in ROC and decision curve analyses. In the full cohort, IsoPSA density achieved an AUC of 0.69 and demonstrated a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 79% at the optimal cutoff of 0.21. Among men with negative MRI (n = 238), an IsoPSA density threshold of 0.17 yielded an NPV of 97% and sensitivity of 85% for ruling out csCaP. In men with large prostates, higher IsoPSA density trended with increased csCaP risk, though not statistically significant.

Conclusions: IsoPSA density performed comparably to PSA density and outperformed traditional clinical predictors of csCaP. In MRI-negative men, its high negative predictive value supports its use as a non-invasive tool to reduce unnecessary biopsies. IsoPSA density may serve as a valuable adjunct in contemporary prostate cancer diagnostic pathways and warrants further validation.

IsoPSA密度提高临床显著前列腺癌的风险分层和活检决策。
目的:评价IsoPSA密度对临床显著性前列腺癌(csCaP)的诊断价值及其在指导活检决策中的应用价值。材料和方法:我们对574例1年内接受IsoPSA检查、前列腺MRI和图像引导活检的患者进行了回顾性研究。IsoPSA密度计算为IsoPSA值除以mri得出的前列腺体积。采用多变量logistic回归、受试者工作特征(ROC)分析和决策曲线分析评估预测价值。对大前列腺(> ~ 70 ml)和MRI阴性(PI-RADS 1-2)患者进行亚组分析。结果:csCaP活检总患病率为33.8%。IsoPSA密度是csCaP的独立预测因子,其表现与PSA密度相似,但在ROC和决策曲线分析中优于PSA和IsoPSA。在整个队列中,IsoPSA密度达到了0.69的AUC,在0.21的最佳截止值下显示了79%的高阴性预测值(NPV)。在MRI阴性的男性中(n = 238), IsoPSA密度阈值为0.17,排除csCaP的NPV为97%,敏感性为85%。在前列腺肥大的男性中,较高的IsoPSA密度与csCaP风险增加呈趋势,尽管没有统计学意义。结论:IsoPSA密度与PSA密度相当,优于csCaP的传统临床预测指标。在mri阴性男性中,其高阴性预测值支持其作为非侵入性工具使用,以减少不必要的活组织检查。IsoPSA密度可以作为当代前列腺癌诊断途径的有价值的辅助手段,值得进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信