Psychedelic-assisted therapy as a complex intervention: implications for clinical trial design.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2025-10-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20451253251381074
S D Muthumaraswamy, M J Baggott, E E Schenberg, D Repantis, M Wolff, A Forsyth, T Noorani
{"title":"Psychedelic-assisted therapy as a complex intervention: implications for clinical trial design.","authors":"S D Muthumaraswamy, M J Baggott, E E Schenberg, D Repantis, M Wolff, A Forsyth, T Noorani","doi":"10.1177/20451253251381074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) has typically been evaluated using conventional randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which assess treatment efficacy under highly controlled conditions. However, PAT constitutes a complex intervention, integrating pharmacological, psychotherapeutic and contextual elements that interact dynamically with patient experiences and healthcare settings. Conventional RCTs, designed for simple interventions, may fail to capture these complexities. Pragmatic trials, by contrast, evaluate interventions under real-world conditions, assessing their effectiveness across diverse clinical environments and patient populations. This position paper advocates for the application of the UK Medical Research Council's (MRC) framework for complex interventions to the development and evaluation of PAT. This framework emphasises the necessity of articulating the underlying theory of therapeutic change, structuring intervention development into defined phases, accounting for contextual interactions and incorporating stakeholder perspectives throughout the research process. We argue that employing pragmatic trial designs, guided by the PRECIS-2 tool, will better align PAT research with the practicalities of healthcare delivery and facilitate the translation of research findings into clinical practice. Further, we address the philosophical divergence in the field between conceptualising PAT as primarily pharmacological versus psychotherapy-augmented, noting the implications of these positions for trial design and interpretation. We propose the integration of qualitative methodologies, adaptive trial designs and comparative effectiveness research to refine PAT interventions and address limitations inherent in conventional double-blind RCT approaches. Finally, we advocate for a pluralistic evidentiary model, combining academic and community-led research, to support the rigorous, equitable and sustainable development of psychedelic-assisted therapies and to avoid the historical setbacks that previously hindered progress in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":23127,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","volume":"15 ","pages":"20451253251381074"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20451253251381074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) has typically been evaluated using conventional randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which assess treatment efficacy under highly controlled conditions. However, PAT constitutes a complex intervention, integrating pharmacological, psychotherapeutic and contextual elements that interact dynamically with patient experiences and healthcare settings. Conventional RCTs, designed for simple interventions, may fail to capture these complexities. Pragmatic trials, by contrast, evaluate interventions under real-world conditions, assessing their effectiveness across diverse clinical environments and patient populations. This position paper advocates for the application of the UK Medical Research Council's (MRC) framework for complex interventions to the development and evaluation of PAT. This framework emphasises the necessity of articulating the underlying theory of therapeutic change, structuring intervention development into defined phases, accounting for contextual interactions and incorporating stakeholder perspectives throughout the research process. We argue that employing pragmatic trial designs, guided by the PRECIS-2 tool, will better align PAT research with the practicalities of healthcare delivery and facilitate the translation of research findings into clinical practice. Further, we address the philosophical divergence in the field between conceptualising PAT as primarily pharmacological versus psychotherapy-augmented, noting the implications of these positions for trial design and interpretation. We propose the integration of qualitative methodologies, adaptive trial designs and comparative effectiveness research to refine PAT interventions and address limitations inherent in conventional double-blind RCT approaches. Finally, we advocate for a pluralistic evidentiary model, combining academic and community-led research, to support the rigorous, equitable and sustainable development of psychedelic-assisted therapies and to avoid the historical setbacks that previously hindered progress in this field.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

迷幻辅助治疗作为一种复杂的干预:对临床试验设计的启示。
迷幻剂辅助治疗(PAT)通常通过传统的随机对照试验(rct)进行评估,该试验在高度控制的条件下评估治疗效果。然而,PAT是一种复杂的干预,整合了药理学、心理治疗和环境因素,这些因素与患者体验和医疗环境动态互动。为简单干预而设计的传统随机对照试验可能无法捕捉到这些复杂性。相比之下,实用试验在现实世界条件下评估干预措施,评估其在不同临床环境和患者群体中的有效性。本立场文件主张将联合王国医学研究理事会(MRC)的复杂干预框架应用于PAT的发展和评估。该框架强调阐明治疗改变的基本理论的必要性,将干预发展构建为定义的阶段,考虑上下文相互作用,并在整个研究过程中纳入利益相关者的观点。我们认为,在PRECIS-2工具的指导下,采用实用的试验设计,将更好地使PAT研究与医疗保健服务的实用性相结合,并促进研究成果转化为临床实践。此外,我们讨论了将PAT概念化为主要是药理学与心理治疗增强之间的哲学分歧,并注意到这些立场对试验设计和解释的影响。我们建议整合定性方法、适应性试验设计和比较有效性研究,以改进PAT干预措施,并解决传统双盲RCT方法固有的局限性。最后,我们提倡多元化的证据模式,将学术和社区主导的研究相结合,以支持迷幻辅助疗法的严格、公平和可持续发展,并避免以前阻碍这一领域进步的历史挫折。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of psychopharmacology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in psychopharmacology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信