Muhammadhasan Nasser, Kaitlyn Soro, Natasha Barone, Kevin J Zuo
{"title":"Dorsal Approach for Corticosteroid Injection in Trigger Finger Management: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Muhammadhasan Nasser, Kaitlyn Soro, Natasha Barone, Kevin J Zuo","doi":"10.1177/22925503251379892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Stenosing tenosynovitis (trigger finger) is a common condition caused by inflammation and hypertrophy of flexor tendons. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) is an effective and safe treatment option. A palmar approach for CSI is typically used; however dorsal injection, which may be less painful, is not well-studied. <b>Methods:</b> A 6-stage scoping review was conducted to characterize outcomes associated with dorsal CSI for trigger finger management. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for eligible articles in English from inception to July 2024. Data regarding study characteristics and CSI outcomes were synthesized. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. <b>Results:</b> Four articles were included in the review, comprising 1 case series, 2 cohort studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT). Symptom resolution rates following dorsal CSI ranged from 54% to 73.5%, comparable to a palmar approach. Two studies compared dorsal and palmar injections and found no significant differences in effectiveness. Pain scores for dorsal injections were similar or significantly lower than those for palmar injections in 2 studies. No adverse effects or complications were reported with either injection technique. <b>Conclusion:</b> Current evidence suggests a dorsal approach for CSI in trigger finger management is noninferior to a palmar approach in terms of efficacy and safety, with potential benefits in reducing injection-associated pain. However, more high-quality studies, including RCTs, are needed. Future research should assess anesthetic distribution and patient-reported outcomes to better understand the clinical implications of a dorsal CSI approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503251379892"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503251379892","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Stenosing tenosynovitis (trigger finger) is a common condition caused by inflammation and hypertrophy of flexor tendons. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) is an effective and safe treatment option. A palmar approach for CSI is typically used; however dorsal injection, which may be less painful, is not well-studied. Methods: A 6-stage scoping review was conducted to characterize outcomes associated with dorsal CSI for trigger finger management. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science for eligible articles in English from inception to July 2024. Data regarding study characteristics and CSI outcomes were synthesized. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Results: Four articles were included in the review, comprising 1 case series, 2 cohort studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT). Symptom resolution rates following dorsal CSI ranged from 54% to 73.5%, comparable to a palmar approach. Two studies compared dorsal and palmar injections and found no significant differences in effectiveness. Pain scores for dorsal injections were similar or significantly lower than those for palmar injections in 2 studies. No adverse effects or complications were reported with either injection technique. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests a dorsal approach for CSI in trigger finger management is noninferior to a palmar approach in terms of efficacy and safety, with potential benefits in reducing injection-associated pain. However, more high-quality studies, including RCTs, are needed. Future research should assess anesthetic distribution and patient-reported outcomes to better understand the clinical implications of a dorsal CSI approach.
简介:狭窄性腱鞘炎(扳机指)是由屈肌腱炎症和肥大引起的一种常见疾病。皮质类固醇注射(CSI)是一种有效和安全的治疗选择。CSI通常采用手掌法;然而,背侧注射可能较少疼痛,但尚未得到充分研究。方法:进行了一项6阶段的范围审查,以表征与扳机指管理的背侧CSI相关的结果。我们检索了Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE和Web of Science,检索了从创立到2024年7月的符合条件的英文文章。综合有关研究特征和CSI结果的数据。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估工具评估偏倚风险。结果:纳入4篇文献,包括1个病例系列、2个队列研究和1个随机对照试验(RCT)。背侧CSI后症状缓解率为54%至73.5%,与掌侧入路相当。两项研究比较了背部注射和手掌注射,发现效果没有显著差异。2项研究中,背部注射的疼痛评分与掌部注射相似或显著低于掌部注射。两种注射方法均无不良反应或并发症报道。结论:目前的证据表明,在触发指的CSI治疗中,背侧入路的疗效和安全性不亚于掌侧入路,在减少注射相关疼痛方面具有潜在的优势。然而,需要更多高质量的研究,包括随机对照试验。未来的研究应评估麻醉分布和患者报告的结果,以更好地了解背侧CSI入路的临床意义。
期刊介绍:
Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.