{"title":"The Role of the Cutaneous Silent Period in the Electrophysiological Diagnosis of Guillain-Barré Syndrome.","authors":"Halil Can Alaydin, Halit Fidanci","doi":"10.1002/mus.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Electrophysiological assessment of small fiber neuropathy in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) remains underexplored in the current literature. This study evaluated the cutaneous silent period (CSP) to assess small fiber involvement in GBS and its utility for differentiating subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective study of 27 patients with GBS (15 with acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy [AIDP] and 12 with other subtypes), 20 with diabetic polyneuropathy, and 20 healthy controls. CSP was recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles using surface electrodes and standardized stimulation protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CSP latencies were significantly prolonged in AIDP patients compared to healthy controls: median APB onset and offset latencies were 117.9 and 161.9 ms versus 69.9 and 123.5 ms, respectively (both p < 0.001), while median TA onset and offset latencies were 144.3 and 176.4 ms versus 106.3 and 137.1 ms (both p < 0.001). AIDP patients also showed longer median APB onset (117.9 vs. 78.2 ms; p < 0.01) and offset (161.9 vs. 130.9 ms; p < 0.05) latencies than other GBS patients. Median CSP duration was shorter in AIDP patients compared to healthy controls (39.2 vs. 57.4 ms; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CSP assessment may complement standard nerve conduction studies by identifying thinly myelinated fiber involvement that helps distinguish demyelinating GBS subtypes. While these findings may not change disease management, they enhance understanding of pathophysiology and may facilitate earlier diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.70043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction/aims: Electrophysiological assessment of small fiber neuropathy in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) remains underexplored in the current literature. This study evaluated the cutaneous silent period (CSP) to assess small fiber involvement in GBS and its utility for differentiating subtypes.
Methods: We conducted a prospective study of 27 patients with GBS (15 with acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy [AIDP] and 12 with other subtypes), 20 with diabetic polyneuropathy, and 20 healthy controls. CSP was recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles using surface electrodes and standardized stimulation protocols.
Results: CSP latencies were significantly prolonged in AIDP patients compared to healthy controls: median APB onset and offset latencies were 117.9 and 161.9 ms versus 69.9 and 123.5 ms, respectively (both p < 0.001), while median TA onset and offset latencies were 144.3 and 176.4 ms versus 106.3 and 137.1 ms (both p < 0.001). AIDP patients also showed longer median APB onset (117.9 vs. 78.2 ms; p < 0.01) and offset (161.9 vs. 130.9 ms; p < 0.05) latencies than other GBS patients. Median CSP duration was shorter in AIDP patients compared to healthy controls (39.2 vs. 57.4 ms; p < 0.05).
Discussion: CSP assessment may complement standard nerve conduction studies by identifying thinly myelinated fiber involvement that helps distinguish demyelinating GBS subtypes. While these findings may not change disease management, they enhance understanding of pathophysiology and may facilitate earlier diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.