"A few more bites?": Manifestation of pressure-to-eat in child care.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Heather Podanovitch, Julie E Campbell, Melissa D Rossiter, Kyly C Whitfield, Jessie-Lee D McIsaac
{"title":"\"A few more bites?\": Manifestation of pressure-to-eat in child care.","authors":"Heather Podanovitch, Julie E Campbell, Melissa D Rossiter, Kyly C Whitfield, Jessie-Lee D McIsaac","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Pressuring children to eat can override hunger and satiety cues, which may lead to over- or under-eating and food refusal. This study aims to describe the manifestations of pressure-to-eat in child care from early childhood educators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary data analysis was conducted using qualitative content analysis. Observations of educators from child care centres in Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island (n = 9) occurred over 2 days. Observation data were coded and counted to determine the most and least prevalent forms of pressure. The count results were then assessed quantitatively by educator demographic characteristics to explore potential associations using nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's correlations).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Offering food and encouraging eating without referencing hunger or satiety was found to be the most common type of pressure; serving children without asking if they were hungry made up the majority of this type of pressure. This was less common with both increasing educator age (r = -0.692, p = 0.039), as well as years of experience (r = 0.878, p = 0.002). Pressuring children to eat by referring to health benefits and consequences was the least common type of pressure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides insight into the types and frequency of pressure-to-eat strategies implemented in child care centres, which can inform interventions to create more responsive feeding environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.70041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Pressuring children to eat can override hunger and satiety cues, which may lead to over- or under-eating and food refusal. This study aims to describe the manifestations of pressure-to-eat in child care from early childhood educators.

Methods: A secondary data analysis was conducted using qualitative content analysis. Observations of educators from child care centres in Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island (n = 9) occurred over 2 days. Observation data were coded and counted to determine the most and least prevalent forms of pressure. The count results were then assessed quantitatively by educator demographic characteristics to explore potential associations using nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's correlations).

Results: Offering food and encouraging eating without referencing hunger or satiety was found to be the most common type of pressure; serving children without asking if they were hungry made up the majority of this type of pressure. This was less common with both increasing educator age (r = -0.692, p = 0.039), as well as years of experience (r = 0.878, p = 0.002). Pressuring children to eat by referring to health benefits and consequences was the least common type of pressure.

Conclusion: This study provides insight into the types and frequency of pressure-to-eat strategies implemented in child care centres, which can inform interventions to create more responsive feeding environments.

“再咬几口?”:饮食压力在儿童保育中的表现。
目的:强迫孩子吃东西可以无视饥饿和饱腹感,这可能导致暴饮暴食和拒绝食物。本研究旨在描述幼儿教育工作者在幼儿保育中的饮食压力表现。方法:采用定性含量分析法对二次资料进行分析。对新斯科舍省和爱德华王子岛儿童保育中心的教育工作者(n = 9)进行了为期2天的观察。对观测数据进行编码和计数,以确定最普遍和最不普遍的压力形式。然后通过教育工作者人口统计学特征对计数结果进行定量评估,以使用非参数检验(Mann-Whitney U检验,Spearman相关性)来探索潜在的关联。结果:在不提及饥饿或饱腹感的情况下提供食物和鼓励进食是最常见的压力类型;这种压力的主要来源是为孩子们提供服务,而不问他们是否饿。随着教育者年龄的增加(r = -0.692, p = 0.039)和工作年限的增加(r = 0.878, p = 0.002),这种情况都不太常见。通过提及健康益处和后果来强迫孩子吃东西是最不常见的压力类型。结论:本研究提供了对儿童护理中心实施的压力进食策略的类型和频率的深入了解,这可以为干预措施提供信息,以创造更具响应性的喂养环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition & Dietetics
Nutrition & Dietetics 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信