The Association of Bone-related Biomarkers With Incident Hip Fracture: A Nested Case-control Study.

IF 3.1 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of the Endocrine Society Pub Date : 2025-09-10 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1210/jendso/bvaf148
Sara J Cromer, Elaine W Yu, Elisabetta Patorno, Gary C Curhan, Julie M Paik
{"title":"The Association of Bone-related Biomarkers With Incident Hip Fracture: A Nested Case-control Study.","authors":"Sara J Cromer, Elaine W Yu, Elisabetta Patorno, Gary C Curhan, Julie M Paik","doi":"10.1210/jendso/bvaf148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Current osteoporosis risk stratification relies on clinical factors and bone mineral density alone.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if osteocalcin, c-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type 1 collagen, sclerostin, and bicarbonate (\"bone-related biomarkers\") are associated with future fracture risk or improve risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Nested, matched case-control.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Longitudinal cohorts of health care workers.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Individuals with and without hip fracture in the Nurses' Health Study I and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Hip fracture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 642 women in Nurses' Health Study I (mean age, 70.3 years; 29% with osteoporosis), we found no consistent associations between bone-related biomarkers and incident hip fracture, and addition of biomarkers to clinical models predicting incident hip fracture did not improve model fit. Among 586 men in Health Professionals Follow-up Study (mean age, 63.8 years; <1% with osteoporosis), higher levels of osteocalcin (odds ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.13-1.04] for quintile 5 vs quintile 1; <i>P</i> for trend = .02) and sclerostin (odds ratio, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.09-0.54] for quintile 5 vs quintile 1; <i>P</i> for trend < .001) were associated with lower risk of hip fracture; however, addition of sclerostin to clinical models predicting incident hip fracture provided limited additional predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Osteocalcin, c-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type 1 collagen, sclerostin, and bicarbonate were not associated with incident hip fracture among older, predominantly White women. Osteocalcin and sclerostin were associated with hip fracture among men but did not meaningfully improve the predictive accuracy of models based on clinical risk factors alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":17334,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","volume":"9 10","pages":"bvaf148"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Current osteoporosis risk stratification relies on clinical factors and bone mineral density alone.

Objective: To determine if osteocalcin, c-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type 1 collagen, sclerostin, and bicarbonate ("bone-related biomarkers") are associated with future fracture risk or improve risk stratification.

Design: Nested, matched case-control.

Setting: Longitudinal cohorts of health care workers.

Patients: Individuals with and without hip fracture in the Nurses' Health Study I and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study.

Main outcome measure: Hip fracture.

Results: Among 642 women in Nurses' Health Study I (mean age, 70.3 years; 29% with osteoporosis), we found no consistent associations between bone-related biomarkers and incident hip fracture, and addition of biomarkers to clinical models predicting incident hip fracture did not improve model fit. Among 586 men in Health Professionals Follow-up Study (mean age, 63.8 years; <1% with osteoporosis), higher levels of osteocalcin (odds ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.13-1.04] for quintile 5 vs quintile 1; P for trend = .02) and sclerostin (odds ratio, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.09-0.54] for quintile 5 vs quintile 1; P for trend < .001) were associated with lower risk of hip fracture; however, addition of sclerostin to clinical models predicting incident hip fracture provided limited additional predictive value.

Conclusion: Osteocalcin, c-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type 1 collagen, sclerostin, and bicarbonate were not associated with incident hip fracture among older, predominantly White women. Osteocalcin and sclerostin were associated with hip fracture among men but did not meaningfully improve the predictive accuracy of models based on clinical risk factors alone.

骨相关生物标志物与髋部骨折的关联:一项嵌套病例对照研究
背景:目前的骨质疏松风险分层仅依赖于临床因素和骨矿物质密度。目的:确定骨钙素、1型胶原蛋白、硬化蛋白和碳酸氢盐的c端交联末端肽(“骨相关生物标志物”)是否与未来骨折风险相关或改善风险分层。设计:嵌套、匹配的病例对照。背景:卫生保健工作者纵向队列。患者:在护士健康研究I和卫生专业人员随访研究中有和没有髋部骨折的个体。主要结局指标:髋部骨折。结果:在护士健康研究I的642名女性中(平均年龄70.3岁,29%患有骨质疏松症),我们发现骨相关生物标志物与髋部骨折发生率之间没有一致的关联,并且在预测髋部骨折发生率的临床模型中添加生物标志物并不能改善模型拟合。在卫生专业人员随访研究的586名男性中(平均年龄63.8岁,趋势P = 0.02)和硬化蛋白(五分位数5 vs五分位数1的优势比为0.22 [95% CI, 0.09-0.54],趋势P < 0.001)与髋部骨折风险降低相关;然而,将硬化蛋白添加到预测髋部骨折的临床模型中,提供了有限的额外预测价值。结论:骨钙素、1型胶原c端交联末端肽、硬化蛋白和碳酸氢盐与老年女性髋部骨折发生率无关,主要是白人女性。骨钙素和硬化蛋白与男性髋部骨折相关,但仅基于临床危险因素的模型的预测准确性没有显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Journal of the Endocrine Society Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信