Optimal capacity planning for long-term care facilities considering patients' gender, language, and age group.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ghazal Khalili, Mohsen Zargoush, Kai Huang
{"title":"Optimal capacity planning for long-term care facilities considering patients' gender, language, and age group.","authors":"Ghazal Khalili, Mohsen Zargoush, Kai Huang","doi":"10.1007/s10729-025-09717-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long-term care facility networks in Canada face significant challenges in balancing demand and capacity, a problem exacerbated by rising demand. In other words, the growing elderly population is escalating the need for long-term care resources. To address this issue, this study proposes a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming model based on the current standing of the long-term care system in Ontario, a representative case for considering varied patient supports. The proposed model simultaneously optimizes the timing and location of constructing new long-term care facilities while dynamically adjusting each facility's capacity, including human resources and beds. Moreover, patient assignments are optimized based on their demand region, gender, language, and age group over a finite time horizon. The model incorporates multiple constraints to accommodate patients' gender and language, addressing language barriers, alleviating feelings of loneliness, and aligning with Canada's commitment to inclusive care. Additionally, it considers patient journeys by incorporating age groups and assigning patients from different demand regions in an equitable manner through the geographical equity constraint. To validate our proposed model, we conduct a case study on the existing network in Hamilton, Ontario. An extensive set of numerical analyses is executed to provide insights into the problem. Most importantly, the results demonstrate that the model effectively optimizes facility placement and patient allocation while significantly reducing un-assignment and misassignment rates. Specifically, the results indicate that over 88% of patient demand can be accommodated annually throughout a five-year planning horizon. In addition, patients can be assigned based on language and gender with marginal additional costs. Lastly, operational costs constitute the largest share of total expenditures, whereas misassignment costs account for the smallest proportion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12903,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-025-09717-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long-term care facility networks in Canada face significant challenges in balancing demand and capacity, a problem exacerbated by rising demand. In other words, the growing elderly population is escalating the need for long-term care resources. To address this issue, this study proposes a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming model based on the current standing of the long-term care system in Ontario, a representative case for considering varied patient supports. The proposed model simultaneously optimizes the timing and location of constructing new long-term care facilities while dynamically adjusting each facility's capacity, including human resources and beds. Moreover, patient assignments are optimized based on their demand region, gender, language, and age group over a finite time horizon. The model incorporates multiple constraints to accommodate patients' gender and language, addressing language barriers, alleviating feelings of loneliness, and aligning with Canada's commitment to inclusive care. Additionally, it considers patient journeys by incorporating age groups and assigning patients from different demand regions in an equitable manner through the geographical equity constraint. To validate our proposed model, we conduct a case study on the existing network in Hamilton, Ontario. An extensive set of numerical analyses is executed to provide insights into the problem. Most importantly, the results demonstrate that the model effectively optimizes facility placement and patient allocation while significantly reducing un-assignment and misassignment rates. Specifically, the results indicate that over 88% of patient demand can be accommodated annually throughout a five-year planning horizon. In addition, patients can be assigned based on language and gender with marginal additional costs. Lastly, operational costs constitute the largest share of total expenditures, whereas misassignment costs account for the smallest proportion.

考虑患者性别、语言和年龄组的长期护理设施的最佳能力规划。
加拿大的长期护理机构网络在平衡需求和能力方面面临重大挑战,需求的增加加剧了这一问题。换句话说,不断增长的老年人口正在加剧对长期护理资源的需求。为了解决这个问题,本研究提出了一个基于安大略省长期护理系统现状的混合整数线性规划模型,这是一个考虑不同患者支持的代表性案例。该模型同时优化了新建长期护理设施的时间和地点,并动态调整了每个设施的容量,包括人力资源和床位。此外,在有限的时间范围内,根据患者的需求区域、性别、语言和年龄组对患者进行优化分配。该模式结合了多种约束条件,以适应患者的性别和语言,解决语言障碍,减轻孤独感,并与加拿大对包容性护理的承诺保持一致。此外,它通过纳入年龄组并通过地理公平约束以公平的方式分配来自不同需求地区的患者来考虑患者旅程。为了验证我们提出的模型,我们对安大略省汉密尔顿的现有网络进行了案例研究。一套广泛的数值分析被执行以提供对问题的见解。最重要的是,结果表明该模型有效地优化了设施安置和患者分配,同时显著降低了未分配和错分配率。具体而言,结果表明,在五年规划期内,每年可以满足超过88%的患者需求。此外,可以根据语言和性别对患者进行分配,额外费用很少。最后,业务费用占总支出的最大份额,而错配费用所占比例最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Care Management Science
Health Care Management Science HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Science publishes papers dealing with health care delivery, health care management, and health care policy. Papers should have a decision focus and make use of quantitative methods including management science, operations research, analytics, machine learning, and other emerging areas. Articles must clearly articulate the relevance and the realized or potential impact of the work. Applied research will be considered and is of particular interest if there is evidence that it was implemented or informed a decision-making process. Papers describing routine applications of known methods are discouraged. Authors are encouraged to disclose all data and analyses thereof, and to provide computational code when appropriate. Editorial statements for the individual departments are provided below. Health Care Analytics Departmental Editors: Margrét Bjarnadóttir, University of Maryland Nan Kong, Purdue University With the explosion in computing power and available data, we have seen fast changes in the analytics applied in the healthcare space. The Health Care Analytics department welcomes papers applying a broad range of analytical approaches, including those rooted in machine learning, survival analysis, and complex event analysis, that allow healthcare professionals to find opportunities for improvement in health system management, patient engagement, spending, and diagnosis. We especially encourage papers that combine predictive and prescriptive analytics to improve decision making and health care outcomes. The contribution of papers can be across multiple dimensions including new methodology, novel modeling techniques and health care through real-world cohort studies. Papers that are methodologically focused need in addition to show practical relevance. Similarly papers that are application focused should clearly demonstrate improvements over the status quo and available approaches by applying rigorous analytics. Health Care Operations Management Departmental Editors: Nilay Tanik Argon, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Bob Batt, University of Wisconsin The department invites high-quality papers on the design, control, and analysis of operations at healthcare systems. We seek papers on classical operations management issues (such as scheduling, routing, queuing, transportation, patient flow, and quality) as well as non-traditional problems driven by everchanging healthcare practice. Empirical, experimental, and analytical (model based) methodologies are all welcome. Papers may draw theory from across disciplines, and should provide insight into improving operations from the perspective of patients, service providers, organizations (municipal/government/industry), and/or society. Health Care Management Science Practice Departmental Editor: Vikram Tiwari, Vanderbilt University Medical Center The department seeks research from academicians and practitioners that highlights Management Science based solutions directly relevant to the practice of healthcare. Relevance is judged by the impact on practice, as well as the degree to which researchers engaged with practitioners in understanding the problem context and in developing the solution. Validity, that is, the extent to which the results presented do or would apply in practice is a key evaluation criterion. In addition to meeting the journal’s standards of originality and substantial contribution to knowledge creation, research that can be replicated in other organizations is encouraged. Papers describing unsuccessful applied research projects may be considered if there are generalizable learning points addressing why the project was unsuccessful. Health Care Productivity Analysis Departmental Editor: Jonas Schreyögg, University of Hamburg The department invites papers with rigorous methods and significant impact for policy and practice. Papers typically apply theory and techniques to measuring productivity in health care organizations and systems. The journal welcomes state-of-the-art parametric as well as non-parametric techniques such as data envelopment analysis, stochastic frontier analysis or partial frontier analysis. The contribution of papers can be manifold including new methodology, novel combination of existing methods or application of existing methods to new contexts. Empirical papers should produce results generalizable beyond a selected set of health care organizations. All papers should include a section on implications for management or policy to enhance productivity. Public Health Policy and Medical Decision Making Departmental Editors: Ebru Bish, University of Alabama Julie L. Higle, University of Southern California The department invites high quality papers that use data-driven methods to address important problems that arise in public health policy and medical decision-making domains. We welcome submissions that develop and apply mathematical and computational models in support of data-driven and model-based analyses for these problems. The Public Health Policy and Medical Decision-Making Department is particularly interested in papers that: Study high-impact problems involving health policy, treatment planning and design, and clinical applications; Develop original data-driven models, including those that integrate disease modeling with screening and/or treatment guidelines; Use model-based analyses as decision making-tools to identify optimal solutions, insights, recommendations. Articles must clearly articulate the relevance of the work to decision and/or policy makers and the potential impact on patients and/or society. Papers will include articulated contributions within the methodological domain, which may include modeling, analytical, or computational methodologies. Emerging Topics Departmental Editor: Alec Morton, University of Strathclyde Emerging Topics will handle papers which use innovative quantitative methods to shed light on frontier issues in healthcare management and policy. Such papers may deal with analytic challenges arising from novel health technologies or new organizational forms. Papers falling under this department may also deal with the analysis of new forms of data which are increasingly captured as health systems become more and more digitized.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信