Comparative gastrointestinal adverse effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists and multi-target analogs in type 2 diabetes: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Frontiers in Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-09-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1613610
Xingmiao Xie, Shuiyuan Yang, Shuzhen Deng, Yuying Liu, Zhibin Xu, Binghong He
{"title":"Comparative gastrointestinal adverse effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists and multi-target analogs in type 2 diabetes: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.","authors":"Xingmiao Xie, Shuiyuan Yang, Shuzhen Deng, Yuying Liu, Zhibin Xu, Binghong He","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2025.1613610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate and compare the gastrointestinal adverse effects associated with different GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and multi-target analogs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using a Bayesian network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the gastrointestinal adverse events of GLP-1RAs in T2DM patients. Inclusion criteria included adult patients with confirmed T2DM receiving any GLP-1RA, with the outcomes focused on gastrointestinal adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, dyspepsia, and reduced appetite. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the comparison of gastrointestinal side effects among different GLP-1RAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 RCTs involving 27,729 participants were included in the analysis. The overall incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was 11.66%, with nausea being the most frequent (21.49%) and reduced appetite the least frequent (5.49%). Tirzepatide had the highest risk of inducing nausea and diarrhea, while dulaglutide and lixisenatide had the lowest risks. Exenatide exhibited the highest incidence of vomiting, while dulaglutide showed a lower risk. Semaglutide demonstrated a significantly higher risk of diarrhea compared to other GLP-1RAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights significant differences in the gastrointestinal adverse event profiles of various GLP-1RAs. Tirzepatide exhibited the highest risk of gastrointestinal side effects, whereas dulaglutide and exenatide showed relatively better tolerability. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians to make informed treatment decisions, emphasizing the importance of individualized therapy based on patient tolerance.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>CRD42024592308.</p>","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1613610"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1613610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate and compare the gastrointestinal adverse effects associated with different GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and multi-target analogs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the gastrointestinal adverse events of GLP-1RAs in T2DM patients. Inclusion criteria included adult patients with confirmed T2DM receiving any GLP-1RA, with the outcomes focused on gastrointestinal adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, dyspepsia, and reduced appetite. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the comparison of gastrointestinal side effects among different GLP-1RAs.

Results: A total of 48 RCTs involving 27,729 participants were included in the analysis. The overall incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was 11.66%, with nausea being the most frequent (21.49%) and reduced appetite the least frequent (5.49%). Tirzepatide had the highest risk of inducing nausea and diarrhea, while dulaglutide and lixisenatide had the lowest risks. Exenatide exhibited the highest incidence of vomiting, while dulaglutide showed a lower risk. Semaglutide demonstrated a significantly higher risk of diarrhea compared to other GLP-1RAs.

Conclusion: This study highlights significant differences in the gastrointestinal adverse event profiles of various GLP-1RAs. Tirzepatide exhibited the highest risk of gastrointestinal side effects, whereas dulaglutide and exenatide showed relatively better tolerability. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians to make informed treatment decisions, emphasizing the importance of individualized therapy based on patient tolerance.

Systematic review registration: CRD42024592308.

GLP-1受体激动剂和多靶点类似物对2型糖尿病胃肠道不良反应的比较:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
目的:本研究旨在通过贝叶斯网络meta分析评估和比较不同GLP-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)和多靶点类似物在2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中的胃肠道不良反应。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和ClinicalTrials.gov,以确定评估GLP-1RAs在T2DM患者胃肠道不良事件的随机对照试验(RCTs)。纳入标准包括接受GLP-1RA治疗的确诊T2DM成年患者,结果集中于胃肠道不良事件,如恶心、呕吐、腹泻、便秘、消化不良和食欲下降。采用贝叶斯网络meta分析计算不同GLP-1RAs胃肠道副作用比较的比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。结果:共纳入48项随机对照试验,涉及27,729名受试者。胃肠道不良事件的总发生率为11.66%,其中恶心发生率最高(21.49%),食欲下降发生率最低(5.49%)。替西帕肽引起恶心和腹泻的风险最高,而杜拉鲁肽和利昔那肽的风险最低。艾塞那肽呕吐发生率最高,而杜拉鲁肽发生率较低。与其他GLP-1RAs相比,Semaglutide显示出明显更高的腹泻风险。结论:本研究强调了不同GLP-1RAs在胃肠道不良事件谱上的显著差异。替西帕肽胃肠道副作用风险最高,而杜拉鲁肽和艾塞那肽耐受性相对较好。这些发现为临床医生做出明智的治疗决策提供了有价值的见解,强调了基于患者耐受性的个性化治疗的重要性。系统评价注册:CRD42024592308。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers in Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
5163
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信